National Enquirer chairman to accept Immunity in exchange for information
- Thread starter Sapidus
- Start date
This_person
Well-Known Member
This_person
Well-Known Member
If I'm not mistaken, we knew he had mistresses and even knocked (at least) one up. Unlike Mr. and Mrs. Clinton, this was all open and admitted to. And, he won.
:shrug: Did you think the information on Obama with Farrakhan should have been public? Did you take great joy at the potential of that reporter being outed?
This_person
Well-Known Member
:shrug: As I said....CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and TNE are all on the same level in today's environment.
Chris0nllyn
Well-Known Member
I don't think anyone actually believes it is real news. That's not the argument. The argument is that as the CEO of American Media, Inc., he was buying exclusive rights to stories about Trump and purposefully not publishing them.
https://www.npr.org/2018/08/24/6414...publisher-said-to-have-immunity-in-cohen-case
This_person
Well-Known Member
And?
Exactly. I wonder what laws that CEO broke....I'm guessing none.
So what? If it were real news and not some he said/she said tabloid story, there's no such thing. Think about someone who has a serious accusation - they don't sell their story to the highest bidder. They go through the authorities and it becomes a matter of public record. Or they pull a Stormy Daniels and go on every talk show that will have them.
I understand that you all sit around all day waiting for some broke chick looking to make a buck to give you some gossip, but normal people don't care about that sort of thing. We care about real news, things that really happened, not salacious rumors that can't be proven.
On one hand, NPR/CNN/etc are admitting that the Enquirer is a skeezy tabloid rumor publication; on the other hand, they're pissed because they want to report that crap, too.
Then why did he get immunity numbnuts?
So what? If it were real news and not some he said/she said tabloid story, there's no such thing. Think about someone who has a serious accusation - they don't sell their story to the highest bidder. They go through the authorities and it becomes a matter of public record. Or they pull a Stormy Daniels and go on every talk show that will have them.
I understand that you all sit around all day waiting for some broke chick looking to make a buck to give you some gossip, but normal people don't care about that sort of thing. We care about real news, things that really happened, not salacious rumors that can't be proven.
On one hand, NPR/CNN/etc are admitting that the Enquirer is a skeezy tabloid rumor publication; on the other hand, they're pissed because they want to report that crap, too.
This just shows how truly stupid you are.
Thinking it’s okay for a newspaper with infinite resources to pay for stories only to bury them to benefit a candidate for office.
You can barely even understand the issue at hand much less explain or defend it
what laws were possibly broken, moron boy?
Hank
my war
You're all over the place, per usual... Bless your heart!
black dog
Free America
Is that the lady that fell into the pond and gave birth to a frog boy baby?
HORSE
yeah SO What :shrug:
sounds like people were looking to GET PAID, not tell a story
Last edited:
Be Specific What LAWS Were Broken ....
So You Have NOTHING But Ad Hominem Attacks ....
So You Have NOTHING But Ad Hominem Attacks ....
Sharyl Attkisson wrote an entire book on how the PRESS Covered for Obama
Ex-CBS reporter’s book reveals how liberal media protects Obama
“Stonewalled: My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama’s Washington”
You have yet to explain what LAWS Were Broken
So You Have NOTHING But Ad Hominem Attacks ....
Last edited:
The one I read was he was lost in the forest for a reeeeeally long time and the baby turned out to be Trumpsquatch!
And your reading comprehension skills are all over the place, per usual.
Bless your heart.
So that dumbchits like you would have something to bitch and cry about.
Chris0nllyn
Well-Known Member
I wasn't trying to make a point, only clarifying a lack of understanding. It obviously ties into Cohen, you know, a guy in the news right now.
And they actually PAID to not tell a story, they weren't getting paid.