Tilted
..
Forgery, Fraud and Ineligibility| The Post & Email
I mentioned this the other day and I believe it was Awpitt who said I was full of crap.
If I am wrong there are others who are also wrong, but right or wrong , I believe our Teflon boy will survive it.
If this article is 100% correct, it still will not matter.There is no one with the courage to do anything about it, certainly not in the Congress nor in the Judicial.
The reasoning in that piece contains at least one critical flaw - it assumes that the term 'Laws of Nations', as it is used in Section 8 or Article I of the Constitution, was meant to refer to Emmerich de Vattel's 'The Law of Nations ...' book (or treatise or whatever one chooses to call it).
Not only would that make no sense based on the context and construction of the Constitutional provision in question, but reading from notes from the Constitutional Convention makes it pretty clear that they were not meaning to refer to that book. The laws of nations was (and still is to a certain extent) a term of art - it referred generally to "the rules that regulate the mutual intercourse of nations or states." That provision of the Constitution not only gave Congress the right to punish offenses against such rules, but to define what they were.