New Image Shows How B-52 Will Look

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
A new image from Boeing shows how the B-52H will look after a series of modifications that the Air Force has said are significant enough to warrant re-designating the aircraft as the B-52J or K. The image was rendered from a digital prototyping model and is likely to closely resemble the final version.

Prominent in the image are the larger-diameter fans of the new F130 engines to be built by Rolls-Royce North America. Also noteworthy are how the engine nacelles, each containing two engines, are set higher and farther forward than the nacelles for the Pratt & Whitney TF-33 engines with which the B-52 has been flying since 1962. The new engines are set higher in part to provide more ground clearance. The need to validate how the new engines/nacelles will behave in relation to the wing and flap system is a major part of the flight testing program set to start in the next two years.

The nose of the aircraft will also be streamlined, losing the blisters that currently house the forward-looking infrared/electro-optical viewing system to facilitate the new radar, a variant of the AN/APG-79 used on the Boeing F/A-18EF SuperHornet. The FLIR/EO system was used for terrain avoidance and battle assessment, but some of those functions will migrate to the radar or already have shifted to either a Litening or Sniper targeting pod, which the B-52 can carry on a wing pylon.




 

spr1975wshs

Mostly settled in...
Ad Free Experience
Patron
Maybe it will finally be able to go supersonic?
1667056971985.png
 

phreddyp

Well-Known Member
In an age where enemies can shoot down supersonic missiles, this huge slow-moving bomber seems like it would be a sitting duck. What the hell does it carry that would negate this?
 

Rommey

Well-Known Member
I wonder if Boeing/AF still has all the jigs used to build the B52's from ~70 years ago...almost seems less expensive to build new airframes with the new updates incorporated from scratch. I can't imagine how many aging aircraft updates they need to do just to keep the current airframes flying after all these years (and how much original metal remains after all these years).
 

spr1975wshs

Mostly settled in...
Ad Free Experience
Patron
I wonder if Boeing/AF still has all the jigs used to build the B52's from ~70 years ago...almost seems less expensive to build new airframes with the new updates incorporated from scratch. I can't imagine how many aging aircraft updates they need to do just to keep the current airframes flying after all these years (and how much original metal remains after all these years).
When I was in AFROTC back in the late 70's, one class we watched a Boeing promotional film about the BUFF.
They had strapped the fuselage to the runway and had a crane connected to each wingtip. 45 degrees of flex.
 

Kinnakeet

Well-Known Member
In an age where enemies can shoot down supersonic missiles, this huge slow-moving bomber seems like it would be a sitting duck. What the hell does it carry that would negate this?
Bombs many bombs real big bombs and real real big bombs that go boom
 
Top