New York's largest health provider fires 1,400 employees who refuse vaccine

black dog

Free America
Things change. Get over it.

Yep... Remember That...

159772
 

Calistress

Active Member
"Taking this vaccine violates my conscience for at least three reasons: first, the use of aborted fetuses in either the development or production of these vaccines, or both, when my religious beliefs require that I respect all human life, including fetal life, and not knowingly profit from harm to fetal life; second, the invasion of my body with foreign toxins when my religious beliefs require I treat my body as a temple, and not so knowingly desecrate it; and third, the coercion against informed consent of this vaccine when my religious beliefs require all medical treatment be conditioned upon informed consent. This is a matter of life and death, the very purpose for which I live my life, respect for all human beings and all human life in the world, a core matter of right and wrong, and essential to my very being. I cannot violate my conscience on such a core matter of my morals and the beliefs that guide me and govern me, formed by religious beliefs and as instructed by my religious tenets. I have never knowingly taken any vaccine, or any medicine, developed or produced with aborted fetal cells, that invaded my body with foreign toxins, or that were compelled against informed consent. The violation of informed consent is a matter of religious conscience; what the Nazi doctors did is morally wrong, spiritually offensive, and participating or partaking in such invasive, coerced medicine at any time offends the very core of my conscience. I cannot consciously disrespect human life, and the core of what makes us human and the dignity it requires we treat ourselves and our fellow human beings, even if it might medically or financially profit me to do so. Some things are not for sale; my conscience, formed by the core of religious tenets, is one of them."

There are no aborted fetal cells in the vaccine. The cell lines used in the testing and development of the vaccine and other drugs date back to the 1970s and it is unknown if the cells are from an intentionally aborted or naturally occurring miscarried fetus.

However, if you still feel the need to reject the vaccines based on your religious beliefs, be consistent and reject the following medications, including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin which also were tested and developed using the same cell line, HEK-293.

  1. Tylenol / Acetaminophen
  2. Advil / Motrin / Ibuprofen
  3. Aspirin / Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA)
  4. Aleve / Naproxen
  5. Pseudoephedrine / Sudafed / / SudoGest, Suphedrine
  6. Diphenhydramine / Benadryl
  7. Loratadine / Claritin
  8. Dextromethorphan / Delsym / Robafen Cough / Robitussin
  9. Guaifenesin / Mucinex
  10. Tums / Calcium Carbonate
  11. Maalox / Aluminum Hydroxide and Magnesium Hydroxide
  12. Docusate / Colace / Ex-Lax Stool Softener
  13. Senna Glycoside / Sennoside / Senna / Ex-Lax / Senokot
  14. Pepto-Bismol / Bismuth Subsalicylate
  15. Phenylephrine / Preparation H / Vazculep / Suphedrine PE
  16. Mepyramine / Pyrilamine
  17. Lidocaine / Lidoderm / Recticare

Common prescription drugs tested on HEK-293 cells or derivative cell lines.
  1. Levothyroxine / Synthroid / Tirosint / Levoxyl
  2. Atorvastatin / Lipitor
  3. Amlodipine / Norvasc
  4. Metoprolol / Toprol XL / Lopressor
  5. Omeprazole / Prilosec OTC / Zegerid OTC / OmePPi
  6. Losartan / Cozaar
  7. Albuterol / Salbutamol / ProAir / Ventolin
  8. Enbrel / Etanercept
  9. Azithromycin / Zithromax
  10. Hydroxychloroquine / Plaquenil
  11. Remdesivir / Veklury
  12. Dapagliflozin / Farxiga / Ipragliflozin / Suglat / Enavogliflozin / Jardiance
  13. Ivermectin / Stromectol
  14. Metformin / Glucophage / Riomet / Glumetza

I would be very comfortable betting you've used more than one of the medications listed in the first set on a consistent basis.
 
Last edited:

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member

There are no aborted fetal cells in the vaccine. The cell lines used in the testing and development of the vaccine and other drugs date back to the 1970s and it is unknown if the cells are from an intentionally aborted or naturally occurring miscarried fetus.

However, if you still feel the need to reject the vaccines based on your religious beliefs, be consistent and reject the following medications, including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin which also were tested and developed using the same cell line, HEK-293.

  1. Tylenol / Acetaminophen
  2. Advil / Motrin / Ibuprofen
  3. Aspirin / Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA)
  4. Aleve / Naproxen
  5. Pseudoephedrine / Sudafed / / SudoGest, Suphedrine
  6. Diphenhydramine / Benadryl
  7. Loratadine / Claritin
  8. Dextromethorphan / Delsym / Robafen Cough / Robitussin
  9. Guaifenesin / Mucinex
  10. Tums / Calcium Carbonate
  11. Maalox / Aluminum Hydroxide and Magnesium Hydroxide
  12. Docusate / Colace / Ex-Lax Stool Softener
  13. Senna Glycoside / Sennoside / Senna / Ex-Lax / Senokot
  14. Pepto-Bismol / Bismuth Subsalicylate
  15. Phenylephrine / Preparation H / Vazculep / Suphedrine PE
  16. Mepyramine / Pyrilamine
  17. Lidocaine / Lidoderm / Recticare

Common prescription drugs tested on HEK-293 cells or derivative cell lines.
  1. Levothyroxine / Synthroid / Tirosint / Levoxyl
  2. Atorvastatin / Lipitor
  3. Amlodipine / Norvasc
  4. Metoprolol / Toprol XL / Lopressor
  5. Omeprazole / Prilosec OTC / Zegerid OTC / OmePPi
  6. Losartan / Cozaar
  7. Albuterol / Salbutamol / ProAir / Ventolin
  8. Enbrel / Etanercept
  9. Azithromycin / Zithromax
  10. Hydroxychloroquine / Plaquenil
  11. Remdesivir / Veklury
  12. Dapagliflozin / Farxiga / Ipragliflozin / Suglat / Enavogliflozin / Jardiance
  13. Ivermectin / Stromectol
  14. Metformin / Glucophage / Riomet / Glumetza

I would be very comfortable betting you've used more than one of the medications listed in the first set on a consistent basis.
If those cells are from the 70s how was Tylenol tested on them, it was available starting in 1955?
 

PrchJrkr

Long Haired Country Boy
Ad Free Experience
Patron

There are no aborted fetal cells in the vaccine. The cell lines used in the testing and development of the vaccine and other drugs date back to the 1970s and it is unknown if the cells are from an intentionally aborted or naturally occurring miscarried fetus.

However, if you still feel the need to reject the vaccines based on your religious beliefs, be consistent and reject the following medications, including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin which also were tested and developed using the same cell line, HEK-293.

  1. Tylenol / Acetaminophen
  2. Advil / Motrin / Ibuprofen
  3. Aspirin / Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA)
  4. Aleve / Naproxen
  5. Pseudoephedrine / Sudafed / / SudoGest, Suphedrine
  6. Diphenhydramine / Benadryl
  7. Loratadine / Claritin
  8. Dextromethorphan / Delsym / Robafen Cough / Robitussin
  9. Guaifenesin / Mucinex
  10. Tums / Calcium Carbonate
  11. Maalox / Aluminum Hydroxide and Magnesium Hydroxide
  12. Docusate / Colace / Ex-Lax Stool Softener
  13. Senna Glycoside / Sennoside / Senna / Ex-Lax / Senokot
  14. Pepto-Bismol / Bismuth Subsalicylate
  15. Phenylephrine / Preparation H / Vazculep / Suphedrine PE
  16. Mepyramine / Pyrilamine
  17. Lidocaine / Lidoderm / Recticare
Common prescription drugs tested on HEK-293 cells or derivative cell lines.
  1. Levothyroxine / Synthroid / Tirosint / Levoxyl
  2. Atorvastatin / Lipitor
  3. Amlodipine / Norvasc
  4. Metoprolol / Toprol XL / Lopressor
  5. Omeprazole / Prilosec OTC / Zegerid OTC / OmePPi
  6. Losartan / Cozaar
  7. Albuterol / Salbutamol / ProAir / Ventolin
  8. Enbrel / Etanercept
  9. Azithromycin / Zithromax
  10. Hydroxychloroquine / Plaquenil
  11. Remdesivir / Veklury
  12. Dapagliflozin / Farxiga / Ipragliflozin / Suglat / Enavogliflozin / Jardiance
  13. Ivermectin / Stromectol
  14. Metformin / Glucophage / Riomet / Glumetza
I would be very comfortable betting you've used more than one of the medications listed in the first set on a consistent basis.

Free will. How about that? I shouldn't have to explain to anyone why I choose not to inject foreign matter into my body. I choose, not you, not the overlords. If the government wants to punish risky behavior, not getting the jab is way down on the list of things it should be looking at. If you're so ****ing scared of a flu bug, maybe your mother should have let you play outside more and not rushed you to the doctor's office and put you on antibiotics every time you had the sniffles. If you're scared, YOU take the precautions to stay well. If that means not going outside your home and interacting with others, that's your call. The emergency authorization worked for getting the most vulnerable protected in a time of mass hysteria. Now that we know more about this thing, and the vaccine, it's time they work towards a better option.
 

ProLifePatriot

Well-Known Member
You Are LYING Again Sapidus
It's impossible to convince todays Libtards of anything other than their own narrative. They don't care about anyone but themselves, they hate freedom, they hate what America stands for and they hate the fact that we have Constitutional Rights. They're too weak to think for themselves which is why they lust for socialism and communism. They lived their lives being so coddled that they will destroy themselves, everything and everyone around them to have the Lamestream Media and a government to control every aspect of their lives without giving one thought to the consequences of their actions.
Their Lord and Savior Brain Dead Biden could murder a reporter on live TV and they'd deny he did it.
 

OccamsRazor

Well-Known Member
How possible?



How probable?

Use the math.



The 14A doesn't need a legal ruling to be part of our US Constitution - it was ruled on in 1868. I'm not sure why you're asking this question, or what the question even is. I ignored it because I presumed it was like your drug testing musing, just something to throw out there as a distraction so I'd leave you alone.
Are these serious questions? I don't see how anything I have posted could be misunderstood. You asked me a question and I answered it. I still have not received the same courtesy. Lets recap.
I stated that there was no constitutional guarantee to employment or schooling. You responded "Yes there is, here is the 14th amendment." I then asked you to provide a court ruling citing the 14th amendment as a source for the right to schooling and employment. You posted a link to the full 14th amendment. I asked again for the ruling backing up your claim. You demanded I answer your question which I did and then I asked for a 3rd time for the ruling. You then stated "The 14A doesn't need a legal ruling to be part of our US Constitution."
You are answering a question that nobody asked. Maybe I am not asking the right question. How about this one?
Where in the 14th amendment, which you have continually cited, does it guarantee any citizen the right to schooling or employment?
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Are these serious questions? I don't see how anything I have posted could be misunderstood. You asked me a question and I answered it. I still have not received the same courtesy. Lets recap.
I stated that there was no constitutional guarantee to employment or schooling. You responded "Yes there is, here is the 14th amendment." I then asked you to provide a court ruling citing the 14th amendment as a source for the right to schooling and employment. You posted a link to the full 14th amendment. I asked again for the ruling backing up your claim. You demanded I answer your question which I did and then I asked for a 3rd time for the ruling. You then stated "The 14A doesn't need a legal ruling to be part of our US Constitution."
You are answering a question that nobody asked. Maybe I am not asking the right question. How about this one?
Where in the 14th amendment, which you have continually cited, does it guarantee any citizen the right to schooling or employment?
Not to jump into the middle of someone else's argument, but I found this. (Beware - it's associated with Boilermaker U.)
 

OccamsRazor

Well-Known Member
Not to jump into the middle of someone else's argument, but I found this. (Beware - it's associated with Boilermaker U.)
Very interesting. Thanks for the article. although it does address the use of the 14th with regards to non-segregation, public vs. private schooling rights, teacher employment, and freedom of speech rights, it does not say that anyone has the Constitutionally protected right to schooling. It appears that it was used to defend rights that INVOLVED schooling.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Are these serious questions? I don't see how anything I have posted could be misunderstood. You asked me a question and I answered it. I still have not received the same courtesy. Lets recap.
I stated that there was no constitutional guarantee to employment or schooling. You responded "Yes there is, here is the 14th amendment." I then asked you to provide a court ruling citing the 14th amendment as a source for the right to schooling and employment. You posted a link to the full 14th amendment. I asked again for the ruling backing up your claim. You demanded I answer your question which I did and then I asked for a 3rd time for the ruling. You then stated "The 14A doesn't need a legal ruling to be part of our US Constitution."
You are answering a question that nobody asked. Maybe I am not asking the right question. How about this one?
Where in the 14th amendment, which you have continually cited, does it guarantee any citizen the right to schooling or employment?

Now that you know your "rona gonna kill us all" narrative has failed, you're trying to change the subject.

Cute.
 

OccamsRazor

Well-Known Member
Now that you know your "rona gonna kill us all" narrative has failed, you're trying to change the subject.

Cute.
Where do you come up with this stuff? You asked a question and I answered. I am still awaiting your answer to the question I posed to you. The same question that has now been posed for the 4th or 5th time. It seems that you are still dancing.
 

black dog

Free America
Not to jump into the middle of someone else's argument, but I found this. (Beware - it's associated with Boilermaker U.)

With using copyrighted material, donations will be made to.
Black Cultural Center, 1100 3rd Street, West Lafayette, IN 47906
 

HemiHauler

Well-Known Member
Where do you come up with this stuff? You asked a question and I answered. I am still awaiting your answer to the question I posed to you. The same question that has now been posed for the 4th or 5th time. It seems that you are still dancing.

I told you this is how it would go.

The poster has zero guiding principles, all emotionally-driven politics. A 1960s re-tread, the political is the personal, and the personal is the political. Statism is a religion for these people. She is EVERYTHING she accuses others of being. When she accuses you of something, she is telling on herself. These people aren't complicated to figure out.

It's fun to watch!
 
Top