Meanwhile, you called people racist and hypocrites and more. Very insulting.
Straight from the progressive's debating checklist.
Meanwhile, you called people racist and hypocrites and more. Very insulting.
Instead Obama was attacked for earning money in a capitalist free market which under any other circumstances Conservatives would cheer.
Therefore it is hypocritical.
You've said more than enough to show your ignorance and racist proclivities.
Please show me when I did that? My post wasn't racist, in the least.
Obama made another $400,000 on Thursday when he appeared at the A&E Networks advertising upfront at The Pierre Hotel. He was interviewed over 90 minutes at the Midtown Manhattan event by presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin in front of the cable network’s advertisers.
Out of office just 98 days, Obama caught some flack earlier this week when it was learned that he had agreed to speak in September at a health care event sponsored by Wall Street bank Cantor Fitzgerald.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said she was “troubled” by the big-ticket talk.
http://nypost.com/2017/04/27/obama-scores-another-400k-speaking-fee-amid-criticism/
Zach Carter, a senior political economy reporter at the left-wing Obama-loving Huffington Post blasted Obama, saying that his "Wall Street payday will confirm for many what they have long suspected: that the Democratic Party is managed by out-of-touch elites who do not understand or care about the concerns of ordinary Americans. It's hard to fault those who come to this conclusion."
Carter went on to say "Obama isn't running for office again, but his sellout sends even uglier signals to the electorate."
Ouch.
[clip]
Worse still, Obama has spent a lifetime self-righteously sneering at those who made their wealth by producing actual products and services that people want and need. It was Obama, after all, who once lectured the country that "at a certain point you've made enough money."
And just a few days ago, Obama lectured the country about how "because of money in politics, special interests dominate the debates in Washington in ways that don't match up with the way the broad majority of Americans feel."
Why shouldn't Obama be judged by his own standards? And why is it that all those spread-the-wealth Democrats get so greedy once they're out of office?
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/obama-turns-out-to-be-a-greedy-one-percenter/
...and in other news, in the last 98 days the initiation and membership fees at Mar a Lago have doubled.
Wrong. You are inferring that from your bias against Obama. None of the words that you use are mentioned in the original post that started the discussion nor did any other poster in a subsequent post say anything about income inequality, spread it around or people should only make so much money.
Instead Obama was attacked for earning money in a capitalist free market which under any other circumstances Conservatives would cheer.
Therefore it is hypocritical.
..back to what it was prior to being cut in half in 2012.
It is certainly true that Obama is cashing in.
Long story short, I wouldn't describe Obama as a "man of the people" though he came from fairly average origins.
I wouldn't describe Obama as a "man of the people" though he came from fairly average origins.
It is certainly true that Obama is cashing in. I can understand why people are turned off by that. It is what it is. He is not the first and likely won't be the last President to cash in once they leave office.
In terms of was Obama a "man of the people", I think there are a lot angles to look at that question for. He was never a populist like Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump. He was an establishment President. And while like all politicians he tried to portray himself as just another average joe he never hid that he was an establishment guy at his heart.
Long story short, I wouldn't describe Obama as a "man of the people" though he came from fairly average origins.
:shrug:
called him aKenyon