Obama's Iran Nuke Deal
- Thread starter nhboy
- Start date
This_person
Well-Known Member
How does that make this ####ty deal any more palatable?
nhboy
Ubi bene ibi patria
This_person
Well-Known Member
I read the White House summary. That was bad enough. It's quite clear that the actual treaty is worse.
Now, I've answered you, please answer me - what about Reagan makes this ####ty deal any more palatable?
nhboy
Ubi bene ibi patria
How is it "quite clear"?
Here, I will post if for you again: http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/full-text-of-the-iran-nuclear-deal/1651/
LibertyBeacon
Unto dust we shall return
Crazy, right? I mean Iran is waging war and attacking its neighbors practically every single day.
glhs837
Power with Control
Crazy, right? Because Irans neighbors are sooooo threatening, right? I can't count the number of countries that have sworn to annihilate them and make them a smoking crater....... why just the other day, there I was, in the regular crowd shouting DEATH to IRAN!!!!!!, and that was great......
This_person
Well-Known Member
You answer me first. I am tired of me asking you a question and you responding with an off-topic question without ever answering me.
Vince
......
Yes nonothing, I've read the doc, heard Obama speak on it, etc. etc. Do you really believe that Iran won't make a nuclear weapon just because they're afraid of our inspection process and any action we will take? Their leader is accepting this to get sanctions lifted and billions of dollars. Do you think they won't make weapons and hide them from us? But then what am I saying, you believe in Obama and everything he says so anything that comes out of the right, you don't believe anyway. :shrug:
Oh, I must have missed this. It states in the agreement that Iran will under no circumstances seek, develop or acquire nuclear weapons. So I guess that must mean they never will and we should trust that they won't.
Last edited:
nhboy
Ubi bene ibi patria
"It's a good deal because it slows down their nuclear program — which they say is for civilian purposes but could be used to make a bomb, and which we think was originally intended to make a bomb. And it puts monitoring and verification measures in place that mean if they try to build a bomb, we're very likely to find out, and to do so with enough time that we have options to do something about it. There's a verifiable gap between their bomb option and an actual bomb. That's why it's a good deal." (J. Lewis)
LibertyBeacon
Unto dust we shall return
Neither Israel, India, or Pakistan signed the nonproliferation treaty. DPRK signed it, broke it twice, and withdrew. Iraq and Syria signed it and broke it.
Do all of these countries merit the same attention we are giving to Iran? If not, why not?
Do all of these countries merit the same attention we are giving to Iran? If not, why not?
glhs837
Power with Control
Well, lets start with the ones who regularly have mass protests chanting "DEATH TO AMERICA!!!!"
Judgment, it's a thing you can do Keeps the list down a bit. I will note that all the above seem to indicate that reliance on pieces of paper to get some countries to not do things you don't want them to do is pretty silly. See the above post about restraining orders......
LibertyBeacon
Unto dust we shall return
Well, lets start with the ones who regularly have mass protests chanting "DEATH TO AMERICA!!!!"
Source? Preferably one that's not propaganda?
LibertyBeacon
Unto dust we shall return
I'm amazed you haven't ascended to the upper echelons of our diplomatic corps yet. You know a lot about geopolitics.
