OMG... a teacher in Calvert County..

rack'm

Jaded
meangirl said:
:high5:

That's the case I was thinking of. We'd just need to learn from his mistakes. :lmao:


Well, of course if he had bagged the shredding........he could have used it for chum out in the bay when blue fishing.......:whistle:
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Wizard!

misslady67 said:
:larry: What sticks me is that the teacher used the "TRAILERS" for his deeds. See in the link above and down the page it shows Libby's "TRAILERS" as how he did it.

This therefore shows another problem with using those nasty TRAILERS.

If the students had been in a school building then the classroom would not be segregated and disconnected to the other classrooms as is with trailers.

The guy might be guilty but the trailers helped him do it all. :whistle:
 

Pete

Repete
JPC said:
:larry: What sticks me is that the teacher used the "TRAILERS" for his deeds. See in the link above and down the page it shows Libby's "TRAILERS" as how he did it.

This therefore shows another problem with using those nasty TRAILERS.

If the students had been in a school building then the classroom would not be segregated and disconnected to the other classrooms as is with trailers.

The guy might be guilty but the trailers helped him do it all. :whistle:
You are a real peice of work. :ohwell:
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
JPC said:
:larry: What sticks me is that the teacher used the "TRAILERS" for his deeds. See in the link above and down the page it shows Libby's "TRAILERS" as how he did it.

This therefore shows another problem with using those nasty TRAILERS.

If the students had been in a school building then the classroom would not be segregated and disconnected to the other classrooms as is with trailers.

The guy might be guilty but the trailers helped him do it all. :whistle:

You are so freaking retarded! This happened in O'Donnel's district. You know, the one who doesn't allow excessive growth (in your words). If you are going to praise him in one post, it is disingenious to criticize the trailers in another post.

He did her in the woods, should we get rid of all the woods? He did her in his daughter's bed. She would we get rid of all beds? He did her in his van. Should we get rid of all vans? He did her in his dad's house. Should we get rid of all houses?

The truth is that this guy is a predator. He would have found a way to abuse this kid if there were no trailers. For you to blame the trailers is absolute idiocy.
 

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
JPC said:
The guy might be guilty but the trailers helped him do it all.
A lot of folks have bashed you around here, but I haven't yet felt the urge to do so... until now.

The above quote is one of the most bone-headed statements I have read on these boards in a while. Beyond the usual 'tards and losers. Even beyond the typical daft Liberalisms.

There are mounds of evidence supporting the accusations against the teacher. Still, you went soft and claim he merely "might" have committed these monumentally disastrous acts.

BUT then you turn and blame the classroom trailers... because, for some disturbing reason, you are supremely obsessed with them. You're putting more blame on the trailers than the actual offender! How can you possibly be so thick?

I don't live in 29b, but I imagine the residents of that area would be very interested to see your blame diversion and misguided obsessions in action.
 

Foxhound

Finishing last
I don't have kids of my own. I do have 12 nieces and nephews. My sisters would have no problem with any evidence being linked to them.

I'm a smart person but forensics are amazing nowadays. I could end up in jail I guess. My only hope is my brother in laws would talk to me before they did anything.

I love my nieces and nephews and would hate for them to be without a mother of father even if it was just prison and not death.
 

willie

Well-Known Member
Foxhound said:
I don't have kids of my own. I do have 12 nieces and nephews. My sisters would have no problem with any evidence being linked to them.

I'm a smart person but forensics are amazing nowadays. I could end up in jail I guess. My only hope is my brother in laws would talk to me before they did anything.

I love my nieces and nephews and would hate for them to be without a mother of father even if it was just prison and not death.
:confused:
Is this a confession? Very odd post.
 

FromTexas

This Space for Rent
Foxhound said:
I don't have kids of my own. I do have 12 nieces and nephews. My sisters would have no problem with any evidence being linked to them.

I'm a smart person but forensics are amazing nowadays. I could end up in jail I guess. My only hope is my brother in laws would talk to me before they did anything.

I love my nieces and nephews and would hate for them to be without a mother of father even if it was just prison and not death.

:faint:
 

kellbelle

Sleep Deprived
My god...this was one of my teachers from high school. One of my favorite teachers actually. I also had his wife for a teacher. It's freakin sick. WTF is wrong with people. It makes me sick...and to think he used his coaching job as access to the girl. Poor girl..he'll get what's coming. I think Libby's father and brother both our cops.
 

misslady67

New Member
Foxhound said:
I don't have kids of my own. I do have 12 nieces and nephews. My sisters would have no problem with any evidence being linked to them.

I'm a smart person but forensics are amazing nowadays. I could end up in jail I guess. My only hope is my brother in laws would talk to me before they did anything.

I love my nieces and nephews and would hate for them to be without a mother of father even if it was just prison and not death.

WTH...you have got to be kidding me :smack:
 

Foxhound

Finishing last
willie said:
:confused:
Is this a confession? Very odd post.


Yes it's a confession that if anyone ever touched my nieces or nephews they would never make it to trial. They (the person who touched my sisters kids) would be on milk cartons and insurance flyers. And my sisters and brothers in law would be in the clear.

Does it make sense now? I hope so!
 
Last edited:

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
Foxhound said:
Does it make sense now? I hope so!
Mostly. I'll bet a lot of people were :confused: (I know I was.)

Hopefully you will never have to do whatever it was you were talking about.
 

Foxhound

Finishing last
hvp05 said:
Mostly. I'll bet a lot of people were :confused: (I know I was.)

Hopefully you will never have to do whatever it was you were talking about.


Yeah sometimes I have trouble getting what I think to sound correct when I write it out.
 

camily

Peace
Foxhound said:
Yeah sometimes I have trouble getting what I think to sound correct when I write it out.
It took me a couple times reading it to get it but I fully understood what you meant. :yay:
 

willie

Well-Known Member
Foxhound said:
I don't have kids of my own. I do have 12 nieces and nephews. My sisters would have no problem with any evidence being linked to them.

I'm a smart person but forensics are amazing nowadays. I could end up in jail I guess. My only hope is my brother in laws would talk to me before they did anything.

I love my nieces and nephews and would hate for them to be without a mother of father even if it was just prison and not death.
I get it.
When you diddle with one of your nieces your sister will get your brother in law to kick your butt. Perfectly clear.
 

camily

Peace
willie said:
I get it.
When you diddle with one of your nieces your sister will get your brother in law to kick your butt. Perfectly clear.
No, he meant that he would want to kill the dude so his neices and nephews would still have their parents. That's why he said "Talk to me first" so he could tell them he would do it.
 
Top