Pearl Harbor...

Pearl harbor?

  • Japanese sneak attack on us December 7, 1941

    Votes: 16 66.7%
  • The USS Arizona

    Votes: 4 16.7%
  • Hawaii

    Votes: 2 8.3%
  • 2,400 US personel lost

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Airplanes with big, red dots on them

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • A day which will live in infamy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • WWII

    Votes: 2 8.3%
  • Tora! Tora! Tora!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Battleship row

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Newt Gingrich not getting in the ballot in Virginia

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    24
  • Poll closed .

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Primaries are a function of the parties. If we didn't have parties, we wouldn't have primaries. There would be the general election and, if needed, a run off.

Which is as I see it. If my extended family nominates a member to attend a conference to represent our clan - I don't want the neighbors and strangers to have a say - it's our family. If the Boy Scouts want to have someone run for them, Greenpeace doesn't get to interfere. That is the way it is supposed to work. And I've always been cool with party leadership just outright picking the nominee, which is the way it once was. Nowadays, the conventions do not select a nominee - they more or less confirm what the primaries have already done.

And if they were all open, a lot of voters could simply nominate their favorite candidate in a small party, thus upending their whole point in the matter.
 
Top