glhs837
Power with Control
There's this astounding space news......
"SLS to cost %30 more"
Since its arstechnica, the comments are usually on point. Like this one
"Pork for the Pork God!"
And referencing Shiny, there's another hop test for the next SpaceX competitor Starship test article maybe tomorrow or Sunday. At this point, Starship looks to beat SLS to orbit for I think under 2 billion. Oh, and unlike SLS, which tosses away the entire launch vehicle and second stage, its all resuable.
"SLS to cost %30 more"
NASA just announced in a blog post that SLS will cost 30% more
Space agency also “confident” in November 2021 launch date—sort of.
arstechnica.com
"NASA also aligned the development costs for the SLS and Exploration Ground Systems programs through Artemis I and established new cost commitments." The new development cost for SLS rocket is $9.1 billion, she said, and its budget for the initial ground systems to support the mission is now $2.4 billion.
Left unsaid: This represents a 33-percent increase for the rocket since 2017, when a "re-plan" of program estimated development costs for the rocket, including a single test flight, would be $7.17 billion. (This was detailed in a US General Accounting Office report published nearly a year ago.) This figure represents only direct development costs. NASA has received more than $20 billion from Congress since 2011 for SLS development and related activities.
Since its arstechnica, the comments are usually on point. Like this one
"Pork for the Pork God!"
And referencing Shiny, there's another hop test for the next SpaceX competitor Starship test article maybe tomorrow or Sunday. At this point, Starship looks to beat SLS to orbit for I think under 2 billion. Oh, and unlike SLS, which tosses away the entire launch vehicle and second stage, its all resuable.