Police Investigating Discovery Of 2020 Absentee Ballots In Michigan Storage Locker

22AcaciaAve

Well-Known Member
How many people go back and make sure their vote was counted and counted correctly?

The answer is: none.

Mail-in votes make it easy because you can throw them away. Put them in a box and - oopsie - "find" them several years later. The human sorting them can be all, "Oopsie, spoiled ballot! In the trash it goes!" There are a number of ways to cheat mail-in votes because there's no digital footprint.

Note that this has been happening in largely Republican precincts. Can that possibly be just a coincidence? Is it really feasible that a district would go overwhelmingly for Republicans on the down ballot, then vote for Biden for POTUS? In districts that went overwhelmingly for Trump in 2016?

I know you all are being told that people who were big Trump fans have grown to despise him - so much that they wanted Joe freaking Biden of all people instead. But that is absurd and it's amazing anyone falls for it.

So have you gone back and made sure your vote was counted correctly? If so, please tell me how you did that. Has anyone ever sent you a confirmation of your ballot? I've never seen that so how do you know your votes were recorded the way you cast them?

I'm not saying sh*t doesn't go on with mail in votes. I'm just saying that is not the smart way to fix an election. I could never guarantee you a win playing that game. I bet I could guarantee you a win by doing it with a covert algorithm in a computer. Who exactly is giving confirmation to this digital footprint. And if there is a digital footprint, I can write an algorithm that will change that.

Bottom line, the only way you can have complete and total transparency is get everyone who wants to vote in rooms around America, have a totally not secret ballot and have it tallied right there so everyone who walks out of the room knows exactly what the vote count is for their room. But that would be impossible with a country the size of America. So you basically trust the system. And I've just told you how the system can be gamed. Now, what you have to hope is that the people running the elections are more honest than the people who are running for office.
 

22AcaciaAve

Well-Known Member
Okay, I see that. I will never understand why an ID is not required when you vote, seems to me it just one of many avenues to use for cheating.

Totally agree. You should need an ID to vote. Amazing that you need an ID to drive, to buy alcohol, and cigarettes, but not to vote. Democrats claim it is voter suppression. I don't understand how. I had to apply for a voter registration card when I turned 18. Why couldn't that be a voter ID? Makes no sense to me.
 

Tech

Well-Known Member
The Maryland mail in ballots are all scanned in. You fill out the ballot by filling in the circles next to the candidate you want to vote for. Nobody is sitting there and transcribing your ballot. I will agree that mail ins can and are damaged by the postal process. I would advocate for all mail-in ballots to be returned to voter boxes that are all over the place. Even then, it could be subject to damage.
Wonder what all those hundreds of ballots I transcribed were for? 🤔
 

22AcaciaAve

Well-Known Member
Wonder what all those hundreds of ballots I transcribed were for? 🤔

To be honest with you, I can't answer that question. I really don't know why ballots with bar codes and scanner readable circles would require someone to copy them over to the same exact thing. I haven't heard anyone say that. I've seen pictures of mail in ballots being scanned in to computers that count the votes. Again, a program inserted into those counters can change the outcome. I really don't know why you were transcribing ballots that could just be scanned in. If you say you were transcribing ballots I believe you, I just don't know why.

But again the better way to insure an election win is through a stealth program inserted into the counting machine. No need to change any votes anywhere, the algorithm will take care of it.
 

22AcaciaAve

Well-Known Member
You don't even have to be statewide - just one or two major cities. That's it.

Agreed. In elections that close, you don't even need to win. You simply need to cut the loss percentage down in the two major cities so that a potential 100,000 vote loss becomes a 50,000 vote win. BOOM....you get all of the electoral votes. Cha-ching!
 
Top