Question...

seekeroftruth

Well-Known Member
:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:

So Trump is a "Womanizer" and you hate him but you prefer the pervy Pedo Democrat instead.

I admire your moral conviction.

Jesus would be proud.

Do you share your bed with the Pedo-Prez?
I don't think he's Pedo.... but I do think he's old. As a matter of fact, I didn't vote for him either.

Trump thinks pussy is his for the taking.... he always has.... I haven't like him since 1962.... but.... then again... he hung out with Epstein, didn't he?... what does that tell you.

Trump reminds me of Herod, Salome's Stepdad. :jerry:

:coffee:
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
I don't think he's Pedo.... but I do think he's old.

Yeah, because all those pictures and video of him groping and sniffing peoples children are just a right wing conspiracy. :rolleyes:

As for Epstein, they've only produced two instances where Trump was engaged in conversation with him but there are dozens, probably hundreds of instances of Leftist freaks, including Clinton and Bill Gates that had deep ties to that maggot and visited his Pedo Paradise in the Caribbean.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member


 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Regarding Ukraine --

I'm generally in support of it, because it's weakening Russia. Essentially, we are fighting a proxy war with Russia. No one WANTS to say that, but that's what's happening. If Russia invaded North Korea or Belarus or even Iran - we wouldn't give a fig. And if there was a huge refugee problem with North Koreans flooding into China or Belarussians fleeing into Lithuania - we wouldn't lift a finger.

Ukraine however, has the likelihood of severely crippling Russia, and if they draw it out, they may win the way lots of such wars are won - the attacker simply loses the will to continue.

As a point of history - England was losing popular support in our Revolution - back home. The people were sick of it. It had gone on too long and too much blood and resources had been squandered on a war that in reality, would never end. And guess what? FRANCE helped us, as did other enemies of the Crown. They were fighting a war with England with us as proxies. It was helping them. WE could hurt them. If England was fighting a war in the Caribbean against some tiny nation fighting for independence - they wouldn't have bothered. Not worth it.

If China should get into a war with say, India - hell yeah we'd help India. It helps US.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
If Trump had financed Ukraine's request way back when... You know... during that request that prompted that famous impeachment phone conversation... how much would we have saved in war costs? The money was in the budget, right?

Just asking... it seems the peace was doing good as long as we paid to shore up other democracies.

Interesting to me how this failure to act has probably cost us millions and millions of dollars.... much more than it would have.

:coffee:
The premise of your "could Trump have done more sooner" is misplaced. As the funds are authorized and appropriated by Congress, what could Trump have done?

From FY 2017 to FY 2021 the US provided Ukraine with approximately $424 million in Foreign Military Financing and $815.6 million in Ukraine Security Assistance. And there was no invasion of Ukraine during that time period.

If you think the funding was the culprit, why wasn't there an invasion during that time period? For me the culprit is extremely clear, that is the lack of backbone, the failure to deter Russia from taking action.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
If you think the funding was the culprit, why wasn't there an invasion during that time period? For me the culprit is extremely clear, that is the lack of backbone, the failure to deter Russia from taking action.

And it's been demonstrated over and over throughout history, yet somehow, these "Oh so better educated, highly intelligent" Democrats never seem to grasp it.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
The premise of your "could Trump have done more sooner" is misplaced. As the funds are authorized and appropriated by Congress, what could Trump have done?

From FY 2017 to FY 2021 the US provided Ukraine with approximately $424 million in Foreign Military Financing and $815.6 million in Ukraine Security Assistance. And there was no invasion of Ukraine during that time period.

If you think the funding was the culprit, why wasn't there an invasion during that time period? For me the culprit is extremely clear, that is the lack of backbone, the failure to deter Russia from taking action.
If Trump had been elected there would have been no war between Russia and Ukraine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
I don't think he's Pedo.... but I do think he's old. As a matter of fact, I didn't vote for him either.

Trump thinks pussy is his for the taking.... he always has.... I haven't like him since 1962.... but.... then again... he hung out with Epstein, didn't he?... what does that tell you.

Trump reminds me of Herod, Salome's Stepdad. :jerry:

:coffee:
Shouldn't you be quoting the Krayon somewhere? :rolleyes:
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
We do it all the time.... we prop up democracies all over the place... while our children go without... isn't that another one of your claims???

I'm Independent, not a Democrat or a Republican.... and I am vocal about hating that womanizer for being such a womanizer.... but why didn't we pay?

Was Trump in bed with Putin????? Are you????

:coffee:
Religion has rotted your brain. You should give it up.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
I don't think he's Pedo.... but I do think he's old. As a matter of fact, I didn't vote for him either.

Trump thinks pussy is his for the taking.... he always has.... I haven't like him since 1962.... but.... then again... he hung out with Epstein, didn't he?... what does that tell you.

Trump reminds me of Herod, Salome's Stepdad. :jerry:

:coffee:
So basically, you're still mad because Trump turned your skanky ass down in 1962.

Get help.
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
Back when Trump ran things, he was pretty much a carry a big stick type of negotiator. He didn't have a history of foreign policy moves that other world leaders could look to in order to gain some sort of yardstick of how he might react. But he talked tough. And the enemies of the US took notice. He went to North Korea. I have to imagine that he didn't use a lot of flowery words or speak of abstract concepts of rainbows and unicorns. It was probably **** around and find out rocket man.

Same with Russia, Iran, China, the palestinians. Don't start no crap and there won't be no crap. When you have a potent military, those threats are easily backed up. A strong military makes for peaceful neighbors. Even the far away neighbors.

Then the US political climate changes as far as leadership. You have the Afghan withdrawal that the entire world witnessed. No matter how they tried to spin that, it was a colossal failure. And it enriched our enemy with the latest gadgets of modern warfare fighting technology. So much for a person with a 40 year history of politics.

Russia took notice of biden's impotence. Plus on the heels of that disaster, the US appetite for all things military overseas was at rock bottom. No way were we going to get involved after a 20 year quagmire was put out of it's misery. I believe the only way we would have gotten involved in any sort of direct military conflict is if we had been attacked directly. Otherwise America was going to sit out the next war. I think that is what the Russians perceived would be the reaction from Washington. I'm sure when Russian troops were massing on the border there were some back channel negotiations going on that the American citizens are not privy to.

But in the end Russia took a chance. If I can believe the news reports of the war over there, the reds may have underestimated their foe. But that happens. It appears the Ukes aren't like the French. They will actually take up arms to defend their homeland. And they may lose, but not without a fight and taking a few tens of thousand of Russians with them to Valhalla.

TL/DR version. If Trump was still in the oval office, Russia plays nice with it's neighbors and doesn't attack.

Also if you believe what you read, Russia has already lost more soldiers in a few months than the US lost in the entire dozen of years we were involved in Vietnam. 93+K killed to ~58K US military killed.
 

CPUSA

Well-Known Member

Here is yet another example of that great and meaningful "discussion" that can be had with the gaggle of mouth breathers here. All that's left is for the queen bee to drop in an insult the OP for daring to ask a question.
Ask a well thought out, reasonable question, get a well thought out, reasonable answer...
Ask stupid chit...you get ME!!!!

Wait a minute...this didn't come out right...
 
Last edited:

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

Trump thinks pussy is his for the taking.... he always has.... I haven't like him since 1962.... but.... then again... he hung out with Epstein, didn't he?... what does that tell you.

And you are supposed to be a Christian? Instead of discussing policy, you disparage. Your ignorance is clearly shown when you, instead of debating, you denigrate the players. Do not enter the field of political discussion when you obviously have no understanding, and instead of coherently expressing well thought out feedback, you violently wave your feminist flag in our faces.

Pussy, his for the taking? This "taking" is not relegated to any one man. That is its intended purpose. To be utilized when the opportunity presents with consent. Also known a coitus which is the impetus for procreation.

You must live in a glass house. And live a perfect life. You must have not ever been associated with someone with a checkered past. Else you'd be considered guilty by association as you've implied here with Trump.

If you spent as much time researching politics and geopolitics, as you spend on your religious posts, then you might have some coherent thoughts to contribute.
 
Top