Hypothetically, I don't think anyone cared.Originally posted by Toxick
Bump!
Nobody answered my hypothetical situation
Hypothetically, I don't think anyone cared.Originally posted by Toxick
Bump!
Nobody answered my hypothetical situation
Originally posted by jazz lady
Hypothetically, I don't think anyone cared.
I would say try it. As far as unwanted attention they will either say yes or no. If they say no they are not going to call your current lender and sayOriginally posted by Toxick
Okay, here's a question.
Let's say, hypothetically, that I bought a house a couple years ago, and since that time, for various reasons and streaks of bad luck, that my credit has gone right straight into the crapper.
Let's further say, hypothetically, that when I refinance, I want to get a chunk of change in order to pay off a vehicle and bring my auto insurance way down (all of which would free up tons of money for mortgage), and do some renovation to the bathroom, and pay for a fence that was destroyed in a hurricane, that my POS parasite insurance company gave me about 68 cents to replace, after the deductable.
The question is: Should I bother refinancing, or will I just draw unwanted attention to myself?
Hypothetically.
Originally posted by ceo_pte
I forsee alot of foreclosures coming within the next few years.
Originally posted by Toxick
Okay, here's a question.
Let's say, hypothetically, that I bought a house a couple years ago, and since that time, for various reasons and streaks of bad luck, that my credit has gone right straight into the crapper.
Let's further say, hypothetically, that when I refinance, I want to get a chunk of change in order to pay off a vehicle and bring my auto insurance way down (all of which would free up tons of money for mortgage), and do some renovation to the bathroom, and pay for a fence that was destroyed in a hurricane, that my POS parasite insurance company gave me about 68 cents to replace, after the deductable.
The question is: Should I bother refinancing, or will I just draw unwanted attention to myself?
Hypothetically.
Originally posted by tatercake
that's good investment potential for folks looking for real estate as a place to stick their money for the long term. Sux for those being foreclosed on, but if someone's gonna be stupid enough to stretch themselves too thin and possible lose their house due to their own stupidity, more power to those who buy it up, turn it around and rent it for a long-term investment. :shrug:
Originally posted by ceo_pte
I wouldn't do it unless I had no other options. I see peole doing this all the time and if baffles me. Yes it does free up some money and it doesn't really effect your mortgage that much, but for God sakes you will be paying for your car for the next 30 years... I know this is hypothetical, but I tell the people that I advise to get their finances under control (ie. their spending) before they think of taking another loan. For example, I heard of someone rolling the cost of blinds ($3000.00) into their mortgage. I have no idea how much they will end up paying for those blinds, but I can guess it will be in the neighborhood of $10,000.00. It will always be pay me now or pay me later! I think alot of people dwell on immediate gratification versus setting a goal, saving the money, then going and buying the object with cash.
Originally posted by SmallTown
Two things that NORMALLY don't make sense in a normal market are perfectly fine currently.
1) Rolling in extra costs to mortgages
2) Interest only mortgages
With the values increasing at an alarming rate, there really isn't a need to avoid the above two things as long as you feel the markets will continue to rise or if you plan to sell in a few years. Again it is a gamble, but so is just about every other investment out there.
Originally posted by wmsaunders
I am a Mortgage Loan Officer here in So MD and the interest only products are very intriging to many home purchasers. Think about it for a second, the normal ammortization schedule of a home mortgage only allows the buyer to pay mostly interest anyway for the first 10 years of the mortgage. With todays escalating home prices, why not go interest only? It allows the new home buyer an opportunity to purchase a nice home for an affordable payment and avoid the sticker shock that often comes with it.
Originally posted by jazz lady
Why not indeed. You build absolutely NO equity in the home and get NO closer to owning your home. You will pay interest forever and have nothing to show for it. But the banks will love you forever.
NO, thank you.
Thank you, but I am very much aware of how financing works and know how much principle is being paid. I do look at the amortization schedule for my loans. I refinanced my first house for a 15 year loan and paid it off in less than that.Originally posted by wmsaunders
The interest only period is usually only for the first 5 or 10 years. And like I said, check your ammortization schedule and find out how much principle is actually applied to your mortgage during the first 10 years and then get back to me. You'll be surprised at how much principle is being paid.
If you are a first time home buyer and looking beyond your means, you are setting yourself up for a fall. You are banking upon the property rising in value enough to be able to now afford the house while the bank is raking in the interest. I think you are giving very dangerous and unsound advice, but that is my opinion.Dont get the wrong idea, I agree that it's not for everybody - but for a first time homeowner who is in the early stages of his prime financial earning years and wants a "nice" home in a neighborhood that may be out of his/her price range - it often fits the bill and helps them get into that home affordably for the first 3-5 years before refinancing into a more conventional loan after the property earns some equity.
I find it incredible that a first-time buyer (that IS what we've been talking about) is looking to purchase a $300k house. I think its unfortunate that you and others are preying upon the "keep up with the Joneses" mentality in order to secure loans for more than people can comfortably afford.I've satisfied many a client with interest only products. Not for everyone - but the shoe fits many borrowers in this day of high property values. There is a big difference between a $265,000 home and a $300,000 home here in Calvert County and "interest only" loans can help a borrower make up that difference.
Again, asking a first-time home buyer to gamble on $300k+ is in my opinion very fool-hardy advice. The only one I see who can work this towards their advantage is the mortgage broker or, as Oz said, the investor who wants to keep up their cash flow.No matter how you slice it, you've got have a little bit of a "river boat gambler" in you to get into an ARM or an INTEREST ONLY loan program but as long you understand and have assesed the risks involved it could work to your advantage.
Originally posted by czygvtwkr
Man I think everyone down here is crazy. I will be a first time home buyer, make $76k year and I think $150k is stretching it, maybe im just a cheap bastard.
Found out the secretary makes less than half of what I make just bought a $250k house....my question is how the hell?