Hopefully the younger Rucci was not in charge of the tossed salads at dad's restaurant.
Nah. Pretty sure he handles the deli salami.
Must have had a bad taste in his mouth about the whole situation!
Must have had a bad taste in his mouth about the whole situation!
Hopefully the younger Rucci was not in charge of the tossed salads at dad's restaurant.
Nah. Pretty sure he handles the deli salami.
I read this thread and some more information about it over the weekend and have to ask "why is this news?" I understand that Dad is a prominent person in the area but what does the sexual escapades of his son have to do with his ability to serve? I dislike that the sons actions are being used to define his father. More so, I really dislike that they are exposing this kid and outrightly embarassing him for what appears to be a way to shame his father.
Don't get me wrong, I don't stay involved with the politics aspect of the area so I have no real opinion of his abilities. But as a father, I have a hard time with the media taking this approach simply because of who he is.
I mean, could they not have left it with a blurb in the police blotter just like any of "event"? Could they have spared all the details?
I read this thread and some more information about it over the weekend and have to ask "why is this news?" I understand that Dad is a prominent person in the area but what does the sexual escapades of his son have to do with his ability to serve? I dislike that the sons actions are being used to define his father. More so, I really dislike that they are exposing this kid and outrightly embarassing him for what appears to be a way to shame his father.
Don't get me wrong, I don't stay involved with the politics aspect of the area so I have no real opinion of his abilities. But as a father, I have a hard time with the media taking this approach simply because of who he is.
I mean, could they not have left it with a blurb in the police blotter just like any of "event"? Could they have spared all the details?
It is news because it apparently involves the rape of a young man. Why is it that rape against males is often laughed at and ridiculed? Granted, the victim in this case may have exercised poor judgment for agreeing to be blind-folded while supposedly getting oral sex from an anonymous woman, but he did not consent to letting the guy give him oral sex. In fact, he reportedly made it clear to the perpetrator that he wanted no homosexual contact. Now, the victim has to live the rest of his life knowing that he received oral homosexual contact against his will.I read this thread and some more information about it over the weekend and have to ask "why is this news?" I understand that Dad is a prominent person in the area but what does the sexual escapades of his son have to do with his ability to serve? I dislike that the sons actions are being used to define his father. More so, I really dislike that they are exposing this kid and outrightly embarassing him for what appears to be a way to shame his father.
Don't get me wrong, I don't stay involved with the politics aspect of the area so I have no real opinion of his abilities. But as a father, I have a hard time with the media taking this approach simply because of who he is.
I mean, could they not have left it with a blurb in the police blotter just like any of "event"? Could they have spared all the details?
It is news because it apparently involves the rape of a young man. Why is it that rape against males is often laughed at and ridiculed? Granted, the victim in this case may have exercised poor judgment for agreeing to be blind-folded while supposedly getting oral sex from an anonymous woman, but he did not consent to letting the guy give him oral sex. In fact, he reportedly made it clear to the perpetrator that he wanted no homosexual contact. Now, the victim has to live the rest of his life knowing that he received oral homosexual contact against his will.
This information would have been made public regardless of the father's political ties. People are intrigued by "odd" news.
I agree to the point that it would be "public". But I think you would have found it on the "Police Activity" blotter on the local newspaper in summary form and without 90% of the details had it been John Doe.
True. And I find this a sad commentary on how things operate "now-a-days". No disrespect to the members here - more just a general statement as I find that society has made a hobby of peering over their fences to see what their neighbors are doing.
It is news because it apparently involves the rape of a young man. Why is it that rape against males is often laughed at and ridiculed? Granted, the victim in this case may have exercised poor judgment for agreeing to be blind-folded while supposedly getting oral sex from an anonymous woman, but he did not consent to letting the guy give him oral sex. In fact, he reportedly made it clear to the perpetrator that he wanted no homosexual contact. Now, the victim has to live the rest of his life knowing that he received oral homosexual contact against his will.
Obviously GW8345, you like gossip too. You're on this thread, right?Because people like to gossip and this is the local gossip website, hence the reason for three pages so far here.
How quickly we forget how the local news is run...http://www.thebaynet.com/news/index.cfm/fa/viewstory/story_ID/12368.
I don't think their names were ever leaked, were they?