Say What?
- Thread starter onel0126
- Start date
C
Chuckt
Guest
King James Bible
For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.
http://biblehub.com/psalms/16-10.htm
Jesus went to the captives in Abraham's bosom which was where the righteous went but did not go to the other compartment.
International Standard Version
For you will not leave my soul in Sheol, you will not allow your holy one to experience corruption. The second evidence is that Jesus came back in the same body which was not consumed by the grave.
Corruption is probably a better word but if Jesus suffered in Hell then he would have experienced corruption.
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
http://biblehub.com/1_timothy/2-12.htm
For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.
http://biblehub.com/psalms/16-10.htm
Jesus went to the captives in Abraham's bosom which was where the righteous went but did not go to the other compartment.
International Standard Version
For you will not leave my soul in Sheol, you will not allow your holy one to experience corruption. The second evidence is that Jesus came back in the same body which was not consumed by the grave.
Corruption is probably a better word but if Jesus suffered in Hell then he would have experienced corruption.
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
http://biblehub.com/1_timothy/2-12.htm
Last edited by a moderator:
C
Chuckt
Guest
The church father Irenaeus is quoted as saying the Gnostics were mutilating or cutting up the scriptures and we find the results of Gnosticism in Calvinism and the Catholic church today. The texts behind the other manuscripts are from Alexandria where you had that heretic Arius.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianism
onel0126
Bead mumbler
You realize it's a poor translation
C
Chuckt
Guest
I look everything up in the Hebrew and Greek so it doesn't bother me what anyone thinks of it.
The Protestant Reformation came out of the King James translation and maybe the Geneva Bible.
Do you see any revivals happening with the NIV, NASB or ESV? No?
Vaticanus was on the shelf for 1,000 years and never used because they knew there was errors in it because that is why it is in such good condition.
The manuscripts that were true got used by believers and they wore out and were in good condition.
The more modern manuscript was found in a trash heap. Do you know what is suspicious about that or which manuscript that was?
You know why the ESV was made right? The NIV was going to come out with a newer version that was gender inclusive so James Dobson and Focus on the Family paid something like a million dollars for the license to the RSV and made something like 70-80 thousand changes which is now the English Standard Version and now the publishers of the NIV lost all that business for trying to be carnal and worldly. I don't have to switch and I don't live in the United Kingdom so I don't have to pay for the copyright of the King James Version.
I'm not saying to not read other versions. I own most of the versions today and I read a few other versions.
But if you are looking for accuracy:
http://www.bible-researcher.com/esv.html
You might want to ask which Bible translations the homosexuals use.
cheezgrits
Thought pirate
So all that said, you understand why skeptics of the organized religions with a focus on literal interpretations of a book, with so many translations and changes made to suit whoever was changing it, are not quick to accept a book edited by man?
C
Chuckt
Guest
No because they took a liberal and unbelieving translation and corrected it.
Who is this "they" that possess such remarkable cosmic truth and power? I want to hire them to update our Druid stuff.
