Secret Court allows NSA to continue bulk data collection

PsyOps

Pixelated
This message is hidden because LibertyBeacon is on your ignore list.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh..................... that feels much better. now you just go on with your ignorance.
 

LibertyBeacon

Unto dust we shall return
This message is hidden because LibertyBeacon is on your ignore list.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh..................... that feels much better. now you just go on with your ignorance.

You know what I think? I think you're yella.

Punk.

Someone quote this so the coward and the phony can see it.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Very well. I'll mark you down as coward.

The floor is yours champ. Anytime you want it.

Who is forcing you to have a mobile device? Let's start there. Go.
Are you seriously threatening someone with physical violence over an internet forum disagreement?
 

littlelady

God bless the USA
Are you seriously threatening someone with physical violence over an internet forum disagreement?

Just remember, LB, wants forum members to die in a fire. This is why I don't take him seriously. He wants to act all intellectual, but stoops to under the gutter lows. And, he started out so great here. Oh well.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I would still like to know how a "Secret Court" was set up in America.
Where in our laws does it say anyone can set up a "Secret Court"

What is it's justification? What does it rule on? Is all of that a secret too?

Does it truly exist?

Where is tilted on this . Or was it a secret to him too?
 

Chris0nllyn

Well-Known Member
I would still like to know how a "Secret Court" was set up in America.
Where in our laws does it say anyone can set up a "Secret Court"

What is it's justification? What does it rule on? Is all of that a secret too?

Does it truly exist?

Where is tilted on this . Or was it a secret to him too?

One thing answers all your questions.

Patriot Act.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Ggeorge sure F**Ked up on that one didn't he?

And some people want to elect his brother.

This doesn't happen without a cooperative people. There just hasn't been enough outrage over it. We're seeing it right here in this forum. Folks justify it by asking "do you have anything to hide" or "can you name one person that has been impacted by the data collection" or "they aren't collecting your conversations" or "you signed an agreement...".

My whole argument is the government shouldn't have the authority to collect this information at will, no matter how benign, doesn't matter if it has affected me at this point, doesn't matter if I have nothing to hide, doesn't matter if I signed some BS agreement with my provider. It's NOT their information. All you need is someone with nefarious intentions to get their hands on this so-called 'metadata' and anyone of you could be a target.

And for the record LB... My job requires I have a cell phone.
 

tblwdc

New Member
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

That hasn't stopped the NSA from spying on just about every American citizen without a warrant.

If the argument (from Ken King) is that you don't "own" your metadata, so it's ok, where does that reasoning stop? There's an expectation of privacy regarding many of the things scooped up under NSA programs.

Could you tell me the name of someone who you know had their metadata spied on by the NSA?
 

Lurk

Happy Creepy Ass Cracka
And you have no clue ####ing as to what is being collected either. Can you name one person that has been impacted by the data collection without an associated warrant. Where have I ever suggested that one should give up their phone or internet? I simply stated that when you agreed to have those services your end user agreement indicated that the data was not yours and that the companies would do with that data as they see fit.

As to your last unwarranted comment go #### yourself.

Isn't this a lot like using the US Postal Service in decades past? We put a stamp on an envelope onto which we affix the name and address where the envelope and its contents are expected to end up. Ideally we have also placed our return address and possibly our name to the envelope. Once the envelope and its contents are placed in the postal service's custody we expect the stamp to be defaced so as to be unusable again and the envelope (and contents) to be transported. Other stamps and messages are affixed to this envelope on occasion and I'm sure the postal service documents the passage of said envelope at certain gates. We are assured the envelope is not opened or violated during the process until the envelope (and contents) reach the destination. Somewhere someone has made note of the passage of our envelope through their hands. Now it's noted by computers which read the identifying informaton and QC code on the stamp. Once it becomes computerized, it is easily archived, analyzed and assessed.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Could you tell me the name of someone who you know had their metadata spied on by the NSA?

See... justifying this because we can't show anyone that has been affected by this. For decades the IRS just collected our taxes and granted tax-exemption for non-profits. Then suddenly someone in our government said "Hey... we have this very powerful agency that collects this information that we can use to go after our political enemies. Let's get some sympathizers to punish our enemies." Knowing we already have people in our government willing to use an agency that collects our 'private' information against us, how can you ever trust that it won't happen through another agency through the collection of our 'private' information?
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
No, we did. We stood by, cheering, wearing our lapel pins, sneering at the 'unpatriotic' D's and chanting "USA!"

In truth I don't believe any of us understood the unintended consequences of the act, any more that the unintended consequences of the ACA, or maybe the consequences were understood by some , but not the general public.

Either way it should be stopped Both the Patriot act and the ACA.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
In truth I don't believe any of us understood the unintended consequences of the act, any more that the unintended consequences of the ACA, or maybe the consequences were understood by some , but not the general public.

Either way it should be stopped Both the Patriot act and the ACA.

I agree... at the time we had no clue what was going on when passing the PA. But now we do, and there is no real outrage over it. The ACA is just proof that the people aren't interested in reigning in big intrusive government. Folks seem to want more of it.
 
Top