Secret Service failure - someone explain this to me

GregV814

Well-Known Member
wait, they're blaming overcompensated caloric intake birther, ? a "them"? OHHH "them" is white..... I get it!
 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
Isn't it time some long retired politicians lose their ss protection? GW and Bubba for starters. They were president how long ago? Are they not filthy rich to begin with? That would free up a lot of resources.
 

Sneakers

Just sneakin' around....
One would think the first thing they'd do is all get on the same frequency.
Well, I can see where having everyone on the same freq would just be sensory overload, and having to listen to information that does not pertain to your working group. Having a radio with the ability to monitor 2-3 frequencies, your own local group and a group priority channel, would be far more workable. Yes, issues with that too, like making sure in the heat of the moment you're on the right transmitting freq, or it's worthless.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
How do you know that?
Listening to some of the former close protectors during their interviews they have all said the same. It is SOP that once a threat is detected (and reported) you do not let the protectee continue out into harm's way.

Now, did the close protection detail get the word? If not, why not?
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
Isn't it time some long retired politicians lose their ss protection? GW and Bubba for starters. They were president how long ago? Are they not filthy rich to begin with? That would free up a lot of resources.
I would say no and having their own security would be out of the intel loop.
 

Sneakers

Just sneakin' around....
Well, I can see where having everyone on the same freq would just be sensory overload, and having to listen to information that does not pertain to your working group. Having a radio with the ability to monitor 2-3 frequencies, your own local group and a group priority channel, would be far more workable. Yes, issues with that too, like making sure in the heat of the moment you're on the right transmitting freq, or it's worthless.
Now that this old brain kicked in.... I used to use exactly this scenario back in the 80s, back in the days of heavy Flight Test of F-14, EA-6B, etc.... I worked in the ground station as a telemetry engineer. We had an intercom frequency assigned to us. The Instrumentation group (responsible for the plane sensors and data links) had their own channel, as did the flight test engineers, antenna receiving station, and on and on. We had as many as 40 people all listening in. With dual headsets, we would communicate with our own group and listen in on another. If needed, we could switch intercoms and directly contact one of the other groups while still monitoring our own group. That was back in the 80s with analog radio systems.

Shoot, NASCAR couldn't exist without this capability.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Not all radio's have enough frequencies built in for them to be able to match the frequency of the Secret Service, but the Secret Service should appear on the scene with enough portables for the use of other agencies if that is the problem.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Not all radio's have enough frequencies built in for them to be able to match the frequency of the Secret Service, but the Secret Service should appear on the scene with enough portables for the use of other agencies if that is the problem.

Our radios at the resort I worked at had multiple frequencies and could tap into the team or just one person. I'm guessing if some pissant vacation resort can do it, certainly the SS and police can.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Our radios at the resort I worked at had multiple frequencies and could tap into the team or just one person. I'm guessing if some pissant vacation resort can do it, certainly the SS and police can.
Yes: But your radios cannot get into the police frequencies., and theirs cannot get into yours.
 

Tech

Well-Known Member
At the very very minimum, the agent in charge of the event didn’t perform a sufficient security plan. Not certain about those under him, but his head needs to be on the block as well as affirmative action hire at the top.
Been saying this since day one. Who was the agent who stated the roof was too slanted, did not secure weak spots, failed to ensure posts were manned. A d warn the protection detail of the alert?
 

Tech

Well-Known Member
Well, I can see where having everyone on the same freq would just be sensory overload, and having to listen to information that does not pertain to your working group. Having a radio with the ability to monitor 2-3 frequencies, your own local group and a group priority channel, would be far more workable. Yes, issues with that too, like making sure in the heat of the moment you're on the right transmitting freq, or it's worthless.
That's what those big communication vans are for.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
They had a car there in case they needed to rush Trump away from danger, The door was locked when they got there.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
That's what those big communication vans are for.

Yep, with an agent assigned to each channel(snipers, perimeter, close detail, overwatch, local resources, etc) all reporting back to whomever has comm oversight, the "big picture" person.

Is that van one of the requested assets they have now fessed up to not providing? Like overwatch, a thing they simply didn't have?
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
They also allowed the moron to repeatedly ask for his slip on shoes that he had fallen out of back and stopped long enough to retrieve them.

That should have been the last of their concern in a moment like this.

Also allowing him to stand up unblocked with a raised fist?

This is amateur level stuff.
 
Top