Sen. Schumer Fascist

[BOP]

“Order Tucker Carlson… to Stop Spreading the Big Lie”​

“As noted in your deposition released yesterday, Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and other Fox News personalities knowingly, repeatedly, and dangerously endorsed and promoted the Big Lie that Donald Trump won the 2020 presidential election. Though you have acknowledged your regret in allowing this grave propaganda to take place, your network hosts continue to promote, spew, and perpetuate elections conspiracy theories to this day,” the Democrat wrote in a letter to Rupert Murdoch referring to the Dominion lawsuit.

The Democrats complained about Speaker McCarthy’s decision to give Tucker Carlson access to the January 6 tapes.

Schumer and Jeffries demanded Tucker Carlson and others participate in a Mao struggle session and publicly apologize for saying words they don’t approve of.

“We demand that you direct Tucker Carlson and other hosts on your network to stop spreading false election narratives and admit on air that they were wrong to engage in such negligent behavior,” the Democrats wrote.

“We ask that you make sure Fox News ceases disseminating the Big Lie and other election conspiracy theories on your network,” they wrote.

You know (and I've said this before), I occasionally wish Hillary was smokin' hot - which she never was, even in her 20s - because evil like that deserves to be drop-dead gorgeous.

Then again, the vast, overwhelming majority of leftist women are not physically attractive, and inside, they're even uglier. As the old saying goes "beauty is skin deep, but ugly goes all the way to the bone."

They're lucky they don't look like old Russian peasant women or something. Better living through chemistry and surgical procedures.

 

[BOP]

Of the two sides playing brinksmanship with our nation's spending - the Democrats have the MUCH WORSE argument of wagging a finger at the Republicans for opposing raising the limit. It's like the Russians whining about war, or Arab states whining about war in Israel. It ends when you stop shooting at them.

Dems have been so used to Republicans capitulating to their every whim, it enrages them when they are confronted, like a child throwing a tantrum when denied candy.

For God's sake - make a deal. The problem is, the Dems haven't been in the habit of making deals in decades - if they don't get their way, they just demonize their opponents in the press. They can't win points with their base - if they make a deal.

The Demonrats are like women when they suspect men are happy without them; they ain't havin' that sh*t.

 

[BOP]

“Chuck Schumer is fighting to prevent Hamas from being destroyed. It’s disgraceful. He will never live this down.”​

My appearance on The Tony Katz Show: “All of American policy for the last two to three weeks, maybe month, has been to try to bully Israel into not finishing off Hamas. And now Chuck Schumer steps in and picks up that cudgel and he hits Netanyahu over the head…. Your legacy will be that you betrayed not just the Jewish people, but you betrayed Western civilization and your own country with these comments at a critical moment in history.”

As I wrote on March 9, the Biden administration and many Democrats, are using the old Obama playbook of attacking Netanyahu because he refuses to capitulate to American political weakness in the face of vile Islamist butchers, Biden Admin, Like Obama Before It, Has Found An Enemy It’s Willing To Fight: Bibi Netanyahu:




Schumer’s attack on Netanyahu must be viewed in the context of the Biden administration’s regime change agenda in Israel. Many other Democrat Senators have made attacks on Netanyahu, including Chris Van Holen from Maryland, who is increasingly looking like Hamas’ greatest defender in the Senate:

Yeah they will. They'll sell out their home country for a little bit (or a lot) of silver.

American Joos are predictable, if nothing else. They seem to hate Israel as much as the rest of the left.

 

[BOP]

Schumer Lets Federal Pension Money Go to Communist China​

So, should taxes that the American people pay to the government of the United States be invested in the People's Republic of China -- or in Russia, North Korea or Iran?

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer voted last month to let such investments continue.

When the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2024 came up in the Senate on July 27, Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida offered an amendment -- that was co-sponsored by Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and Republicans Sens. Joni Ernst of Iowa and Dan Sullivan of Arkansas. It said, as explained in its summary, that money from the Thrift Savings Fund -- which handles the pensions of U.S. servicemembers and federal workers -- "may not be invested in securities that are listed on certain foreign exchanges."

Specifically, these are exchanges in "countries of concern," meaning a country "identified as a threat to the national security of the United States in the most recent report submitted by the Director of National Intelligence... (commonly referred to as the 'Annual Threat Assessment')."

In other words, under this amendment, the pension funds of U.S. servicemembers and civilian federal employees could not be invested in China, Russia, North Korea or Iran.

When Rubio's amendment came up for a vote on July 27, he gave a brief speech on the Senate floor.

"The federal Thrift Savings plan is the largest defined contribution plan in the world," Rubio said. "It has 22 China-only funds. Every single one of them has money going toward companies that are sanctioned, that are on the Entity List -- companies that are responsible for the human rights violations against the Uyghurs; companies that our own government has said are helping the Chinese build their military -- Chinese-sponsored companies."

I'm glad I'm no longer in the TSP. When Biteme got elected, I lost $30K before we could move it into an income fund. FJB!

 

[GURPS]

Why Chuck Schumer Will Go Down As 'One Of The Worst U.S. Senators In American History': Eric Schmitt​

 

[GURPS]

 

[GURPS]

Democrat Leader DELETES EMBARASSING Father's Day Post After Getting ROASTED For Humiliating Himself!​

 

[GURPS]

The ‘King Chuck” Con: Congress and Judges Are Already Immune for ‘Official Acts’​

By Robert F. Turner


President Biden and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer have called the Supreme Court “out of control“ and “extreme.” But their efforts to undermine and intimidate the Court are as dangerous to our constitutional system as they are disingenuous, for they represent a monarchal effort to control the Court.

Under Article III of our Constitution, the nation’s “judicial power” is vested in the Supreme Court and lower courts to be established by Congress. In addition to resolving “cases” or “controversies” brought before the Court, since the landmark 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison, it has been understood that power includes the right to declare acts of other departments and state governments unconstitutional. As Chief Justice John Marshall explained in Marbury: “[A] Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.”

Without respect for Article III, Democrats were outraged when the Supreme Court held that the Constitution does not address the issue of abortion and declared it should be decided by the American people through their elected representatives rather than by nine unelected justices. It took no position on the merits of abortions. Then, they complained when the Court banned racial discrimination from college admission policies.

Most recently, they have attacked the Court’s decision to recognize that presidents and former presidents have criminal immunity for their official acts. In reality, the Trump v. United States case is quite consistent with past Supreme Court jurisprudence. Thus, in 1967’s Pierson v. Ray—in an 8-1 decision written by the very Liberal Chief Justice Earl Warren—the Court “recognized the continued validity of the absolute immunity of judges for acts within the judicial role...even when the judge is accused of acting maliciously and corruptly.” In 1980’s Nixon v. Fitzgerald, the Court declared: “The President’s absolute immunity [from civil lawsuits] is a functionally mandated incident of his unique office, rooted in the constitutional tradition of the separation of powers and supported by the Nation’s history.”

The Trump decision that has so outraged President Biden and prominent Democrats did nothing more than affirm that the president and former presidents have the same constitutional immunity from criminal prosecution for their official acts already firmly established for the legislative and judicial branches.

 

[GURPS]