Tonio said:
You're right about that. It bothers me that many (not all) women mock us because of that, like we can't prove to them that we have any intelligence or civilized thoughts. It's almost like having a relative who is a convicted criminal and everyone knows it.
Maybe you and I have run across very different types of women - I do not see them mocking men because they desire more sex. On the contrary - I've been told by both my wife and several other ladies I know that a woman's mind can be, and is at time, just as sexually oriented as men's. From what I understand some can put a seasoned sailor to shame.
Fact is that I do desire sex more then my wife - I think about it constantly - she, only occasionally. I do not demand sex - when I feel in the mood - I wait until she is in the mood also. Sure it can be frustrating, but I can honestly say that in the 20 years I've been with my wife I have never, ever cheated on her. I may complain about what I consider a lack of our lovemaking - but when it does happens - it is great. I do not think my wife feels that I'm not intelligent or that I do not have civilized thoughts. I think that she accepts me as I am - a 45 YO with an overactive sex drive (who does not spell worth a crap).
Now as far as the product goes. Yes - I can see it being abused, I'd hope it would be regulated somehow, but at the same time I can see where it could have some medical practicallity too.
Is it a product that this country or world is in great demand of ? I don't think so. But then again why was Viagra invented ? Same basic principal - wouldn't the invention of PT-141 just be equal rights for woman since Viagra users are predominately men ?
I think the money would have been better spent working on a cure - say for breast cancer. I love breasts.
Like another posted said - just my 2 cents.