Lenny
Lovin' being Texican
vraiblonde said:WHAT??? Without a PlayStation, special religious meals and access to taxpayer funded education??? How inhumane!
OK, ya dayum liberal. We'll let them have one PSP and one game cartridge.
vraiblonde said:WHAT??? Without a PlayStation, special religious meals and access to taxpayer funded education??? How inhumane!
bdh802 said:This man tells it the way it is. The media and Judges are out of control!
http://mfile.akamai.com/12948/wmv/vod.ibsys.com/2006/0728/9591734.300k.asx
As Birco drove through the nearby intersection of Cambridge and Felton streets, his car was struck by the suspects' van, which had run a stop sign, police said. The police car spun out of control on impact, hit a curb, flipped on its side and struck a utility pole.
Authorities investigating a crash that killed a San Francisco police officer during a chase of robbery suspects early Wednesday are trying to determine why the officer drove into the pursuit without telling dispatchers.
The van was being chased north on Cambridge by officers in at least two other cruisers, none of whom knew Birco was in the area, authorities said.
Larry Gude said:The driver of the van should get a death sentence out of this and cops need more tools to deal with the epidemic of criminals fleeing in vehicles. It's dangerous for the cops and innocent bystanders and property.
Tonio said:(Dumb idea: If I were writing an action movie, I would have police helicopters armed with air-to-ground guided missiles to take out criminals fleeing in vehicles. )
Larry Gude said:Cops can not be expected to just let bad guys go. It is appropriate to be able to stop the vehicle. Otherwise, it is a danger to the public.
Tonio said:Agreed. Cops need better tools for stopping fleeing criminals. Thanks partly to action movies and TV cop shows, the high-speed chase has a macho image it doesn't deserve, with officers using their big, powerful engines to subdue their prey. The cop is supposed to protect public safety, not demonstrate his virility.
bdh802 said:What's the matter Tonio? Did an officer use his big bad powerful engine to pull you over to issue you a seat belt ticket?
bdh802 said:1)Cop chases bad guy, bad guy wrecks and hurts someone else or
2)Cop doesn't chase bad guy, lets him get away, only for the bad guy to commit another crime.
Tonio said:I was trying to make a Freudian joke. This would also apply to the criminals in the high-speed chases. Some of them certainly WANT to be chased, due to some delusional Bonnie & Clyde ego-trip.
I'm saying there should be a third choice...
3) Cop uses missileor other device to stop bad guy's car, avoiding a chase which may kill or hurt innocent people.
vraiblonde said:I don't blame the guy - how would you like to be a cop in a libby area? Doing your job to help keep the residents safe, risking your life for theirs, and the local media gets all excited about whether a cop followed procedure rather than the recidivist criminal that killed him?
Cops are SUPPOSED to chase criminals - that's why we got them. Now the "progressives" want to pass laws so cops CAN'T chase criminals because somebody might get hurt.
The world just gets crazier and crazier.
Because if they run across some crime being committed, there might be an altercation. Then the cop will be roundly criticized in the media and possibly sued, and the criminal will go scot-free.slaphappynmd said:Why aren't they patrolling trying to keep an eye out and preventing crime.
So they'll have backups to keep up the chase when the cops start wrecking into things and going off into ditches.Dickinsmd said:My question is why have I seen 15-20 police cars (sometimes more) chase a single car?
Toxick said:I never smile if I can help it. Showing one's teeth is a submission signal in primates.
When someone smiles at me, all I see is a chimpanzee begging for its life.