Should we bail out GM?

Bail out GM

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 5.7%
  • No

    Votes: 33 94.3%

  • Total voters
    35
The system will never correct itself if money is just pumped into it by a govt bailout. GM (and others) need an internal restructure, stop outsourcing so much, and build a better quality product to compete. If they cannot do that, then they SHOULD fold.

I kinda hate saying that, as I really like GM products and my next truck was also going to be a GMC.
 

limblips

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Absolutley not! The unions that proclaim to "take care of their members" are the ones that have caused the automakers to become unprofitable. All the current economy has done is to bring their situation to the forefront. Let the union take care of the problem with the dues they have collected and the benefits they have extorted from the companies. It is time the worker is no longer exploited by the unions! Unions have become what they were founded to prevent!
 

cashncarry

New Member
American auto makers thumbed their noses at their customer base now it's our turn to thumb our noses at them. So long GM, Ford and Chrysler. Maybe in another life you'll take care of your customers.
 

Pete

Repete
I say no BUT the problem is this. If GM were to go into chapter 13 they could renogotiate contracts, trim waste and come out better. The problem is if GM goes into bankruptcy the fear is that people will stop buying GM cars because they will fear not having dealer/manufacturer support for parts, service and warranty repairs. This will kill GM even if they slash waste and come out leaner and meaner.
 

Bustem' Down

Give Peas a Chance
No, if they would produce a quality product, then foreign manufacturers would not be stomping them. I like chevy, but will probably never own one again because I really don't like fixing them all the time. I've had a Toyota for 120,000 miles and all I've had to do is put oil and gas into it and change the tires.
 

HeadCase

IT's ALL RED
Who's gonna bail me out

When I make financial "mistakes"? Once again; how can we expect our children to take responsibility for their own actions when we have lawmakers, CEOs, clergy etc etc getting help.

Oh I forgot...welfare too!

There is NO accountability in this country while a simple "I'm sorry" makes everything ok???? Are you kidding me?????

Shame on you, you and you for rolling over and allowing it. If I have to be responsible for my actions and my kids for theirs then you do for yours too.
 
No.

GM CEO's 2007 compensation worth $15.7 million - Boston.com

General Motors Corp. Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner received compensation valued at $15.7 million for 2007, up 64 percent from the previous year, according to a federal regulatory filing the company made on Friday.

more stories like thisWagoner earned $1.56 million in salary and no bonus last year, but he received incentive awards of $1.8 million, and stock options and restricted stock valued at $11.7 million, according to the filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

GM lost a record $38.7 billion in 2007, largely due to a charge for unused tax credits. Without the charges and other one-time items, the company lost $23 million.

Also in the filing, the company said it had changed its pension plan so executives can retire at age 60 with full benefits. The company's retirement age was 62. The AP does not include pensions in its compensation figure.

Wagoner received $45,291 for personal and business use of company aircraft, $164,561 worth of security benefits and $185,472 for life insurance and death benefits, according to the filing.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
...

...I'd rather see 'bail outs' for manufacturers and defense contractors than I would Wall Street. Insurance and banking come AFTER manufacturing.

Nobody was greeted by bankers and insurers at Jamestown.

We should have bailed out homeowners and put money into the homes to pay mortgages; you remember; the source of the problem.

:tap:
 

Pete

Repete
...I'd rather see 'bail outs' for manufacturers and defense contractors than I would Wall Street. Insurance and banking come AFTER manufacturing.

Nobody was greeted by bankers and insurers at Jamestown.

We should have bailed out homeowners and put money into the homes to pay mortgages; you remember; the source of the problem.

:tap:
I agree totally with this. The problem is how do you spread out 700 billion to the roots? Knowing government, the cost creating a Bureau of Mortgage Adjustment and Relief would take half the 700 Billion as overhead.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
...

No.

Ford CEO Mulally got $28 million for four months on job - Apr. 5, 2007

Struggling Ford Motor Co., which posted a record $12.7 billion net loss in 2006, gave its new CEO Alan Mulally $28 million for four months on the job, according to the company's proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission Thursday.

...and that cost what, $9.30 per vehicle, sold for the year? $28 mill/2.9 million vehicles sold.


Good Lord, if his leadership found a way to squeeze $9.31 more profit out of each car, he paid for himself and did the company some good. I wish you all would apply some broader perspective to these type numbers.

That loss is $4200 per car/truck. $9 per unit is NOT the problem.

:tap:
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
...

I agree totally with this. The problem is how do you spread out 700 billion to the roots? Knowing government, the cost creating a Bureau of Mortgage Adjustment and Relief would take half the 700 Billion as overhead.

...you hire Larry Gude, give him $10 mil in cash (I work cheap) and get out the mans way. That's how.

Already, my trillion dollar/20 million house/$50,000 for mortgages plan would have fixed housing overnight, along with the ####wads on Wall Street and insured a happy, healthy Christmas for all. Including car makers who would have seen a spike in sales this fall. Not to mention a healthy spike in poinsettia sales.

But, noooooooooooooooooooo.
 

Pete

Repete
...and that cost what, $9.30 per vehicle, sold for the year? $28 mill/2.9 million vehicles sold.


Good Lord, if his leadership found a way to squeeze $9.31 more profit out of each car, he paid for himself and did the company some good. I wish you all would apply some broader perspective to these type numbers.

That loss is $4200 per car/truck. $9 per unit is NOT the problem.

:tap:

I made this point earlier in another thread regarding the salary of the GM CEO. His salary came to just under 90 cents per unit.

It is the vulgarity of someone making $8 million or $15 million that stikes people and maked them angry even though that 15 million is like a spit in the ocean.
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
Why

do you think that the manufacturers are failing at the same time? Both are right on the verge, both need the same exact bailout. Did they both make the same mistakes? Neither was able to gain a competitive advantage? Neither is just a little bit stronger than the other?

Why would they want to be so weak right now? Consider this:

They ask for a bailout. Americans get upset. Obama steps in to solve it all with universal health insurance. The automakers no longer have to fund their union healthcare plans. They are now on a level playing field with their competitors. They are suddenly solvent. Obama is a hero for saving Detroit.

Hmmmm......
 

msqtech

Citizen
Don't Bail them out make them compete just as Honda Toyota and Nissan have to do.

And the added costs per are a result of bad practices in the past. They need to stop blaming pay for their mistakes and make a good product.

They will get it just like the airlines did if we let them.
 
Top