So GFY

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
You’re an idiot. That was one of the questions from the SC Justices. You should try paying attention.
Sotomayor actually. And it was batshit when SHE said it too. Ordering a hit on a political enemy isn’t an official act of the Executive Branch per the Constitution.
 

HemiHauler

Well-Known Member
Sotomayor actually. And it was batshit when SHE said it too. Ordering a hit on a political enemy isn’t an official act of the Executive Branch per the Constitution.

Declare that person a risk to national security or a “terrorist”, it sure as crap is.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

Declare that person a risk to national security or a “terrorist”, it sure as crap is.

Not if that person is an American on American soil, due process and all that. Hell, even Obama had American's killed when they were in foreign lands. That is not to say that "accidents" don't happen here. Most often times, (I am guessing here), without a Presidents knowledge, are conducted by the CIA or another alphabet agency.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
For your consideration ...



Not if that person is an American on American soil, due process and all that. Hell, even Obama had American's killed when they were in foreign lands. That is not to say that "accidents" don't happen here. Most often times, (I am guessing here), without a Presidents knowledge, are conducted by the CIA or another alphabet agency.

Besides, this sort of thing DOES happen, and no one is the wiser. I still have doubts regarding Ron Brown and Vince Foster, but it's not going to matter at this point.

As I understand it - it is intended to KEEP political rivals from taking legal action against one another if during their time in office, they do something - presumably NOT killing people - that they disagree with politically. OR to simply punish themto deter others. You can't have Trump clap Biden in jail for letting 15 million illegals in and you can't have a Democratic successor put Trump in jail after his term because of some climate change legislation that he vetoed. Or starting a war. Or compelling people to take a vaccine that kills them.

Because in banana republics, that's what they do. It's no longer a difference of opinion anymore, it's right/wrong and an existential threat.

There's a presumption of reasonability that the most extreme cases are not the norm. You can't rule on a law that never has a "loophole" somewhere, but you also can't have political parties at each other's throats - at least in COURT- for executing the legitimate duties of their office.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Greatly expanding presidential powers....



Democrats are a death cult. When they're not killing babies they want to kill their political opponents. The only people they don't want to kill are violent criminals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

thurley42

HY;FR
ATF straight up murdered a guy raiding his home at 5 am, when the could have arrested him at work AWAY from his fire arms ... or raided his house WHEN HE WAS NOT HOME
The ATF is full of bullied children dog murderers........Thanks to the Chevron deference, these idiots will begin to be held accountable.
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Well-Known Member
This wouldn’t even be an issue if the roles were revered and it was a former president that was a democrat. No one would hold press conferences after the SC decision.
 
Top