...can we also acknowledge that members of the news media are likely paid for their Democrat propaganda as well?
So now that we know celebrities are paid for their Democrat political endorsements....
- Thread starter vraiblonde
- Start date
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
Beings many have no ratings at all yet they continue.......... pretty safe bet. Has anyone here EVER watched Kimmel? I used to watch Craig Furgeson then he was yanked. Leno's replacement maybe 3 times total, can't even think of his name. They suck. Rather a old movie free streaming......... last night best years of Our Lives....... Gutfelds monologue.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
I kind of doubt the "liberal journalists" are paid to present their propaganda, however I do believe that the media that does the hiring is left and there is no way they will hire a Conservative.
One wouldn't think a bunch of liberal celebrities would have to be paid to endorse liberal candidates, and yet here we are.
Rightturn On Red
New Member
Most celebrities are all about money and have no morals. They would endorse dog crap as a healthy nutrient if the bucks are right.
I read a book once about how celebrities sell their name for charitable orgs, things I always thought they did for free because they believed in the cause. It really realigned the way I donate.
Probably not. When there are whole newsrooms with zero Republican voters, it would be just wasting money.
Conservatives don't survive long in these environments, because everything they write gets sent back or rewritten or they don't stay on.
The news organization determines the output.
Liberal journalists write the way they do because it's what they think and they gravitate towards like-minded news outlets.
That said - we already know that social media - while not needing to be PAID - is rewarded (not with money) for doing certain things and NOT punished for doing others. That could be interpreted as being paid.
Hollywood has very few Republicans, so you'd think they wouldn't need to be paid either.
I wonder if it's just because it was Kamala Harris. Would they have done it for free if it was a more viable candidate instead of that lazy vapid gigglebox?
I STILL find posts on the Internet where people are in awe of her - and AOC - praising them for their brains and assailing all people who didn't vote for her as racist and misogynists.
Think how dumb you have to be to consider Kamala Harris smart.
I judge people by sht like that.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
I would say that judging a person by their calling Kamala Harris intelligent is Prima Facie evidence
To be fair - PRIVATELY people learned that Bush was smart even though PUBLICLY he seemed like a nitwit. He may not have been a great President - but he was NOT stupid.
OTOH - I’ve yet to hear Kamala ever say anything intelligent.
I never thought Bush was a nitwit. The MSM hammered it every day trying to make me think he was a nitwit, but I never saw for myself anything that was particularly nitwitted, unless we're all just a bunch of nitwits because we occasionally say something covfefe.
I remember how they went on and on that Gerald Ford was a klutz because he tripped once. A kid in my American History class got extra credit for pointing out that Ford was an athlete and graceful dancer, which one doesn't normally associate with "klutz".
Conservatives not in the closet have moved out of Hollywood or are strong enough to survive aka Mike Row
Watch Kevin Sorbo on either Mike Rowe or Triggernomotry ... he move out, and is working is ass off, no he is not making 500 million dollar Hollywood Blockbusters but he is working his ass off ..
Same thing with Neal McDonough watch his Mike Rowe Interview