Capital Gains: Rates will rise to 10 or 20 percent, depending upon income, on January 1, 2009. This is current law set to expire soon. Obama says families with incomes below $250,000 will continue to pay the capital gains rates that they pay today. Does he mean "today' or January 2, 2009? As the top rate if the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire is 20% anyhow, just what is Obama changing? The bill President Reagan signed into law was radically different (Zorro is old enough to remember) than what he proposed. The Democrats controlled Congress.
Reagan's original 1985 proposal would have cut the capital-gains tax. He had reduced the rate from 25 percent to 20 percent in his 1981 tax cut and wanted to reduce it to 17.5 percent in his new tax reform. In his televised address unveiling the plan, Reagan proclaimed: "To marshal more venture capital for new industries — the kind of efforts that begin with a couple of partners setting out to create and develop a new product — we intend to lower the maximum capital-gains tax rate to 17-1/2 percent.
Be precise, Senator Obama! Misleading statement at best, and I'm being kind.
John Berlau on Bush's and Reagan's Tax Reforms on National Review Online
Actually, I don't have the time to refute every point of Obama's shell game. For those interested here are a couple links for analysis, without all the rhetoric that isn't accurate:
Competing Tax Plans: Two Perspectives - Freakonomics - Opinion - New York Times Blog
The Impact of the Presidential Candidates' Tax Proposals on Effective Marginal Tax Rates
Economists For McCain
There is also a link embedded in the last article to a PDF of McCain's plan.
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't George H. Bush refer to supply-side economics as "voodoo economics"?
For every proponent that claims supply-side economics works... You find an opposite opinion.
I believe Reagan's final take can be summarized as "Should of, could of, would of..."