Star Trek

[Kyle]

 

[limblips]

And... Sorry, need to click on it to see the whole thing.

 

[PJay]

 

[Sneakers]

Ok... I have a new respect for AI....

btw... there's at least one of these Super Panavision 70 shorts for just about every movie and show.

 

[stgislander]

Ok... I have a new respect for AI....

btw... there's at least one of these Super Panavision 70 shorts for just about every movie and show.

Finally something AI is good for.

 

[Merlin99]

Ok I’ve got a question, when they start AI kiddie porn is that legal or illegal? I can guess everyone here would agree it’s immoral, but is it illegal?

 

[Sneakers]

Ok I’ve got a question, when they start AI kiddie porn is that legal or illegal? I can guess everyone here would agree it’s immoral, but is it illegal?

Probably already crossed that line with anime.

 

[Hessian]

 

[Hessian]

 

[PJay]

 

[Miker/t]

 

[rio]

View attachment 182169

This took me a second

 

[Miker/t]

 

[PJay]

 

[Kyle]

 

[Kyle]

 

[DaSDGuy]

Ok I’ve got a question, when they start AI kiddie porn is that legal or illegal? I can guess everyone here would agree it’s immoral, but is it illegal?

Not if it's on Hunter Biden's new laptop. Daddy Brandon needs something to watch from his beach chair.

 

[Ken King]

but is it illegal?

Think it is, if you follow the definition of Child Pornography

18 USC § 2256(8) - (8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where— (A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or (C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

 

[Merlin99]

Think it is, if you follow the definition of Child Pornography

18 USC § 2256(8) - (8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where— (A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or (C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

So under section B it looks like it would be illegal to use an actress of any age that appears to be a minor.

 

[Merlin99]

Not if it's on Hunter Biden's new laptop. Daddy Brandon needs something to watch from his beach chair.

It could be the real thing here as long as it was within the last 10 years. Thanks Dad.