Stormy Daniels interview......
- Thread starter Bird Dog
- Start date
Toxick
Splat
I presume you meant "compromises their morals".... and I think you'd be hard pressed to find a great many people who didn't compromise their morals in the last election.
Our choices were:
1) Republican #### Show
2) Democrat #### Show
3) Not a chance in hell Libertarian #### Show
4) Not a ####ing chance in hell Green #### Show
Even people who happily "waste their vote", by opting for a third party had to hold their noses at those worthless non-mainstream options.
We were given the option to pick one of four #### sandwiches to eat.
Nobody should be surprised that we actually taste ####.
Maybe next go around, one of the parties will actually give us a candidate that doesn't absolutely suck, and suck absolutely.
But I'm not holding my breath.
Yr not going to break out the ruler though....right?
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
I am not an evangelical but I have stated here many times that I voted for Trump because there was no other choice.
IOt was Trump or Hillary and only a retard would vote for Hillary.
And when a fool speaks of morals and how could anyone moral vote for Trump , Let's look at what that fool voted for.
The Clintons sold tainted blood.
Bill raped more than one woman and treated others as meat.
His wife accepted this behavior, and screwed Vince Foster and Web Hubbell, whom she had a child by. before turning to lesbianism.
She cheated, stole, and corrupted many people in her nefarious career.
We can call Trump names and chastise him ,but even so he is head and shoulders a better person than either Hillary of Bubba Clinton.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Speaking of candidates that suck, IE Obama and Reggie Love.
By the way when sap asks for proof of my accusations, tell him I have the same proof that he has that Trump had whores pee in a bed.
Toxick
Splat
I hope I don't have to.
Although I broke it out last election. You'd be surprised who had the longest hog.
On the other hand, maybe you wouldn't be.
for the Sig-line quote.
Jesus Christ your mind is a terrifying place.
You believe all that garbage and still think a Trump Russia connection is tenuous.
You really need mental help.
Seriously.
If we had a quick vote on here, you and tranny would win hands down on who needs mental help....especially with your Trump issues.
It’s nice to know that you beleive in Jesus though.......
While at the same time yours is vacant, vacuous, and bereft of a single original thought.
SamSpade
Well-Known Member
YOU believe in the pee tape.
AND all the collusion crap that no one seems to have uncovered any evidence for.
It's your equivalent of "birther".
awpitt
Main Streeter
Very nice observation here.
I was one of the ones who had to hold my nose and voted "3) Not a chance in hell Libertarian #### Show". My morals would NOT allow me to vote for crooked Hillary or crooked Donald.
It interesting how some people chastised Clinton for his deviant behavior but now, it's it seems to be okay.
Last edited:
It interesting how some people Gave Clinton A PASS for his deviant behavior but now, because Trump [a 3 times divorced cheating CAD] boned a Porn Star / Playboy Playmate 10 yrs ago, suddenly sex matters.
Missing the word "not" somewhere in that bolded line?
As to deviant behavior, are you suggesting sexual assault = consenting adults (remember it wasn't just Hormonica)?
awpitt
Main Streeter
Damm, Ken. Nice catch.
SamSpade
Well-Known Member
I'm not crazy about any man with "deviant behavior" - but I generally expect them to put an end to it once inside the White House - or the Capitol.
In any event, we're back to the circular argument cycle where it's "how can you support this guy when.." vs. "how come it outrages you NOW, but not back when...".
The difference being that in the court of public opinion - the left WON that. The "it's just sex" thing.
Until it becomes convenient for them to use it and then I guess, all bets are off.
When I cast my vote or lend support to someone for a position, my primary concern is how effective they will be in that position.
If I am voting for someone who is coaching a team, I care about how good a job they will do, not whether they screw their neighbor or wear women's clothes.
(I *would* care if they were a pedophile or abusive, but that points back to effective, because to me effective isn't just a matter of winning games).
It would be GREAT if they were a person of great character, but it's pretty clear that a person of good character won't succeed in the seedy world of politics.
awpitt
Main Streeter
It's also interesting that Clinton didn't get in trouble because of the sex. It was because of perjury and obstruction of justice. These are the areas that Trump needs to be concerned about.
Definitely not "OK" by any stretch. However...it reportedly occurred 10 years before he ran for President. Clinton's long string of extra-marital shenanigans carried right on through his tenure as President, with some of it occurring right there in the Oval Office.