I used to say no one could spend both sides of a dollar like my Dad. I learned a lot from him.
Budget. Plan ahead. Plan for the unexpected. Shop different stores. Try to only buy stuff on sale, and stock when it is.
Grow food. Buy in bulk if it's worth it. Buy used. Rent things you'll use once.
Go to yard sales, thrift stores, consignment stores.
My Dad liked auctions, something I usually have no stomach for.
Fix things. Can't? Learn.
Teach this to your kids. Let them learn the consequences of bad money handling.
Suffice it to say, I AM saving a plugged nickel for college - but it won't be anywhere near enough.
My income hasn't come even close to keeping up with the cost of college. By the time they're old enough, it will be more than
the cost of a mortgage payment - per month. It will reach a point where the cost of college may far exceed what they may reap financially.
And I have more than one child. I've reached the point where I realize that without significant scholarship money, they aren't going.
This is the core of the argument. In your dads day, it was feasible to save, to be able to see where being that responsible, however slow and steady, was building tangible wealth. As you point out, for most people, while it's certainly not impossible, it's just simply changed so much as to be much more difficult. Useful stuff
http://www.mybudget360.com/cost-of-living-2014-inflation-1950-vs-2014-data-housing-cars-college/
Since 1950, housing has gone from something like 2.2 times annual income to now over 4. A car was .45, now .61. And college went from .18 to .79
So, in 1950, a house and a car and college cost was under $10,000, total, and you'd make about a third of that. You could buy those things in three years. Of course, you had food and clothing and everything else but for the purpose of an apples to apples comparison, you COULD buy those 3 major items with 3 years of income.
Now, they cost about $260k and you'd make about a fifth, so 2 full years more to buy those same three major things. At some point, the car is wearing out as well as the home, so losing time on being able to buy them means you continue to fall behind. The education is over and done.
Then this says nothing about the increased expectations of consumer goods and vacations and so forth in terms of what you'd spend then vs. now.
Just for the basics, a young person starting out is facing a race that is 40% longer, at bare minimum, than their parents. If you figured on working from 25 to 65 then, 40 years, at bare minimum, you'd need to figure on 16 more now or 79 for the same life as 1950's man. At some point, and we're there now, futility and frustration replace optimism and hope and it's not because today's people can't face the challenge as well as our predecessors. It's because the challenge has become some 40% bigger. And our dads have FAR, FAR more expended on them that they did not scrimp and save for, health care and longer life, than their parents did then or they had any expectation of now that is not even in those numbers.
Health care has gone from just under 5% of GDP in 1950 to nearly 18% today. So, while a house doubled in relation to you income and a car went up by a third or so, health, like school, went up about four fold. It's like a tractor pull where the weight bears down on the traction wheels more and more as you go. You can't win. It's designed to stop you. This is the fatal flaw in our system so many don't begin to have a grasp on and with immigration, productivity gains, automation and outsourcing, the pressure on the income side is also enormous AND growing.
So, while we commonly think we pale in comparison to prior generations, our challenge is far greater and worsening. Rapidly.
It Trump wants to make America great again and 1950 is as good a model as anything else, to be the same, average income needs to, at the very least, be double, DOUBLE what it is right now. Or, we need to have houses that cost half and cars that are 1/3 less and school that costs a quarter and health care that costs a quarter of what it does now. Or some combination of the 2.
That's the challenge.