BOP
Well-Known Member
Obviously it caused tremendous harm to his child. His child is a spoiled brat, and that's likely because of the way he treated his child. I understand that the use of language such as his to a sixteen year old girl is no big deal, I get that's what it's like in your household. But this kid didn't become the kid she is without help from those two "parents".
She's a spoiled brat because he didn't start early enough in her discipline. I'm not unconvinced that that was probably the first and maybe only time he ever got mad enough to take a belt to her. Maybe, maybe not, but children who've had the belt taken to them regularly, or often enough, know better than to try and resist it the way she was.
By the way: never, ever discipline your children when you're angry. The emotional damage comes in part because of mixed messages you send when you apologize to the child for hitting them while you were angry. A few good strokes of the belt is nothing for the vast majority of children, if it's administered with love and not while the parent is angry.
It's not discipline if you cannot make them understand that they are being punished for their behavior, not because of who they are. That's the message a parent sends when they punish a child in the throes of anger. And that's the most damaging aspect of it all. Not a few good strokes from a belt.