That silly "Religion of Peace"

[VoteJP]

Mr Short-Bus.

Your post is incoherent and pointless.

You say things like that a lot and yet I do not find it as accurate.

In fact I see my posting as very coherent and it went directly to the point.

If you or anyone does not understand my words then I would be happy to explain any or all of it, but I say that is not necessary indeed.

I don’t care how ignorant someone’s speech is it does not justify death threats.

The thing is, as your self and others so conveniently ignore, that the Dutch politician was and is promoting violence from his high position by trash talking the religion of Islam.

So all the Muslims in that area surely feel their death threats from that politician while the threat against that nasty Dutch dog is only a threat to shut up one (1) and only one bigot that is threatening many Muslims.

You do not care about that man's ignorant speech because his is a bigoted threat against your mutual enemy.

Given all the insulting criticism thrown your way and your sympathetic stance on such barbaric behavior, one can only surmise you have a hit list of beheadings planned.

No, I am far to clever for that.

The real power lays elsewhere.

All sarcasm aside, I think you tread on dangerous ground with your radical rhetoric.

Mine is very much like "John the Baptist" that cried out telling that the high authority is in the wrong.

 

[VoteJP]

Mr Short-Bus.

So, you, therefore, agree that Jesus is the Prince of Peace and that the Words of Jesus, not Muhammad, are the teachings to follow.

No, I say to follow both the words of Jesus and of Muhammad as they are very harmonious and it is the same God by different names.

Both the Bible and the Quran are holy books.

(Fixed) "...it would also be a "huge improvement if "Muslims" would follow the words of Christ (Matthew 5:43-48)

I very honestly say and believe that the Muslims are far more accurately following Christ than are the Christians.

The Muslims do not follow Christ perfectly but they do better than the warmonger, bigoted and dishonest Christians.

 

[PsyOps]

Mine is very much like "John the Baptist" that cried out telling that the high authority is in the wrong.

Very narcissistic of you.

 

[VoteJP]

Mr Short-Bus.

Very narcissistic of you.

I was really giving my agreement with your comment that I am treading on "dangerous ground".

And the missing point that I thought needed not said - that the Baptist John got his head cut off for preaching his "radical rhetoric" which is not exactly a narcissistic ideal.

 

[PsyOps]

I was really giving my agreement with your comment that I am treading on "dangerous ground".

And the missing point that I thought needed not said - that the Baptist John got his head cut off for preaching his "radical rhetoric" which is not exactly a narcissistic ideal.

Oh, sorry... Sacrificial lamb for the greater cause: Justifying Muslims in their pursuit of peace through violence and hatred.

 

[VoteJP]

Mr Short-Bus.

The Bible states that Ishmael was an ass of a man and all of his people will be marked (paraphrased)

That does demonstrate as most of the rhetoric here that it is just racial and religious prejudice against the Muslims by pretentious Christians.

And God blessed Ishmael as a great nation, link = Genesis 17:20.

Of course that blessing does not fit into your kind of Christian bigotry.

 

[Starman3000m]

I was really giving my agreement with your comment that I am treading on "dangerous ground".

And the missing point that I thought needed not said - that the Baptist John got his head cut off for preaching his "radical rhetoric" which is not exactly a narcissistic ideal.

Since you're on the subject:

Did you know that King Herod at first thought that the appearance of Jesus on the scene was John the Baptist risen from the dead? Anyway, for those unfamilar with the story, while John had been imprisoned it was King Herod's wife that was instrumental in calling for the beheading of John:

From Mark, Chapter 6:

14: And king Herod heard of him; (for Jesus' name was spread abroad and he said, That John the Baptist was risen from the dead, and therefore mighty works do shew forth themselves in him.
15: Others said, That it is Elias. And others said, That it is a prophet, or as one of the prophets.
16: But when Herod heard thereof, he said, It is John, whom I beheaded: he is risen from the dead.
17: For Herod himself had sent forth and laid hold upon John, and bound him in prison for Herodias' sake, his brother Philip's wife: for he had married her.
18: For John had said unto Herod, It is not lawful for thee to have thy brother's wife.
19: Therefore Herodias had a quarrel against him, and would have killed him; but she could not:
20: For Herod feared John, knowing that he was a just man and an holy, and observed him; and when he heard him, he did many things, and heard him gladly.
21: And when a convenient day was come, that Herod on his birthday made a supper to his lords, high captains, and chief estates of Galilee;
22: And when the daughter of the said Herodias came in, and danced, and pleased Herod and them that sat with him, the king said unto the damsel, Ask of me whatsoever thou wilt, and I will give it thee.
23: And he sware unto her, Whatsoever thou shalt ask of me, I will give it thee, unto the half of my kingdom.
24: And she went forth, and said unto her mother, What shall I ask? And she said, The head of John the Baptist.
25: And she came in straightway with haste unto the king, and asked, saying, I will that thou give me by and by in a charger the head of John the Baptist.
26: And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath's sake, and for their sakes which sat with him, he would not reject her.
27: And immediately the king sent an executioner, and commanded his head to be brought: and he went and beheaded him in the prison,
28: And brought his head in a charger, and gave it to the damsel: and the damsel gave it to her mother.
29: And when (Jesus') disciples heard of it, they came and took up his (John the Baptist's) corpse, and laid it in a tomb.

 

[Toxick]

Tip of the Day:

I very honestly say and believe that the Muslims are far more accurately following Christ than are the Christians.

You know, you really shouldn't post until the quaaludes wear off.

 

[PsyOps]

I very honestly say and believe that the Muslims are far more accurately following Christ than are the Christians.

I've tried to find it but just can't. Can you help me find where Jesus said "Strap bombs to yourself and blow people up in my Name"?

 

[VoteJP]

Mr Short-Bus.

I simply must agree that the Muslims do go to extremes in seeking peace.

It is like taking the rotting apple out of the bunch so that it will not infect the others.

It would be better if the Christians or the Dutch would police themselves to shut-up that racist and religious bigot but no.

Or if that Dutch bigot politician would apologize and make amends and thus repent then he too could join in making peace.

It surely does appear that the only ones seeking after peace are the followers and respecters of the religion of peace.

Alekum es salaem / and peace unto you too.

I feel that I must add that Muslims never ever make insults about Jesus (Isa) because they see Jesus as a true messenger of God, and Muslims do not burn the Bible or desecrate the Bible in any way because they see the Bible as a holy book, and in fact the Muslims never ever even say some insult about Christianity because they respect Christianity.

 

[bresamil]

.

The Muslims do not follow Christ perfectly but they do better than the warmonger, bigoted and dishonest Christians.

You do realize, do you not, that the Christians have not declared a "holy war" since the time of the Crusades.

 

[Vince]

This message is hidden because the idiot VoteJP is on your ignore list.

:fixed: Yeah, I know ya'll get a kick out of arguing with him.

 

[retiredweaxman]

I feel that I must add that Muslims never ever make insults about Jesus (Isa) because they see Jesus as a true messenger of God, and Muslims do not burn the Bible or desecrate the Bible in any way because they see the Bible as a holy book, and in fact the Muslims never ever even say some insult about Christianity because they respect Christianity.

Does this mean we can ship you off to Iraq/Iran armed with nothing more than a Bible and you will be welcomed into their society???

If they respect "the Holy Book" then it can be surmised they respect everyone that carries a Holy Book.

Let me know how that works out for you Jimmy!!!

 

[VoteJP]

Mr Short-Bus.

I've tried to find it but just can't. Can you help me find where Jesus said "Strap bombs to yourself and blow people up in my Name"?

That is because you yourself are mixing political action in with religious doctrines which of course can not fit and do not apply.

As in Jesus also never said to occupy foreign Countries and establish puppet regimes and to demand Muslim women to take off their clothes and for drones to bomb non combatant homes murdering everyone indiscriminately.

If you show me where Jesus said for "Christians" to do these things, then I will show you where Jesus said that Muslims have every right to defend themselves against those violent Christian invaders.

 

[Toxick]

You do realize, do you not, that the Christians have not declared a "holy war" since the time of the Crusades.

Yeah there's that.

Plus Jesus said "Turn the other cheek", and "Love your enemy" and such platitudes.

If JP wants to revile Christians and say they don't follow the teachings of Jesus, that's fine. Even if JP wants to be a Muslim apoligist and defend their various behaviors as "self-defense" - that's all well and good. But their behavior simply flies in the face of everything Jesus stood for. Period.



So as usual, although JPC thinks he has a good grip on religion, and the world at large, the only thing he really has a good grip on is his own engorged member.

 

[VoteJP]

Mr Short-Bus.

You do realize, do you not, that the Christians have not declared a "holy war" since the time of the Crusades.

In these latter days the so-called "Christians" mis-use the American flag as their idea of a Christian banner.

As in President Bush declared the Afghan and Iraq invasions as being Christian "crusades" but then Bush was informed not to use "that" word as it exposes the Christian bigotry behind these wars.

 

[bresamil]

In these latter days the so-called "Christians" mis-use the American flag as their idea of a Christian banner.

As in President Bush declared the Afghan and Iraq invasions as being Christian "crusades" but then Bush was informed not to use "that" word as it exposes the Christian bigotry behind these wars.

Whoa there! The flag is a sign of patriotism, not religion. We have many soldiers who are not of the Christian faith. They stand for their flag and country - not a religion, and they battle for flag and country - not a religion.

 

[Vince]

Does this mean we can ship you off to Iraq/Iran armed with nothing more than a Bible and you will be welcomed into their society???

If they respect "the Holy Book" then it can be surmised they respect everyone that carries a Holy Book.

Let me know how that works out for you Jimmy!!!

I'll put up money for a one way ticket!!!

 

[retiredweaxman]

Whoa there! The flag is a sign of patriotism, not religion. We have many soldiers who are not of the Christian faith. They stand for their flag and country - not a religion, and they battle for flag and country - not a religion.

Sounds like JPC is going against the very thing he said just a couple of minutes ago:

"That is because you yourself are mixing political action in with religious doctrines which of course can not fit and do not apply."

 

[Toxick]

In these latter days the so-called "Christians" mis-use the American flag as their idea of a Christian banner.

So there's nobody but Christians in our government and military?

This is interesting.

As in President Bush declared the Afghan and Iraq invasions as being Christian "crusades" but then Bush was informed not to use "that" word as it exposes the Christian bigotry behind these wars.

Number one: Bush never declared them to be "Christian" anything. He once stepped on his crank and referred to them as "crusades", but he did not say "Christian" either implicitly or explicitly. It's rather obvious that Bush was using the word "crusade" in a more modern, secular, generic fashion rather than a direct reference to the Holy Wars of 1,000 years ago.

Crusade - croo-SAYD

1. v. Exert oneself continuously, vigorously, or obtrusively to gain an end or engage in a crusade for a certain cause or person; be an advocate for​

The word "crusade" in that context was most definitely a poor word choice (and I think we can all agree that Bush was often guilty of cramming his foot into his mouth) but the war, such as it is, was secular in nature, and not some Christian Jihad as you're trying to say.

I cannot think of ANY of our stated goals which came anywhere close to "conversion" or anything remotely related to conversion or suppression of existing religious practices.

I have not heard any muslims complaining about being forced to abandon their religion or switch to a new one.