PeoplesElbow
Well-Known Member
FYI the overpriced hammer was because some idiot wanted a hammer with replaceable parts so instead of going to Lowes and buying the best Hammer they sell a custom modular hammer that had replaceable parts was made.
There are a lot of reasons, but most of it comes to economy of scale and then all the overhead the prime can add to the bill.FYI the overpriced hammer was because some idiot wanted a hammer with replaceable parts so instead of going to Lowes and buying the best Hammer they sell a custom modular hammer that had replaceable parts was made.
Stealth is the big deal, above all else.
the F-35 was designed with stealth in mind. Both it and the F-22. They just don't look like the first generation stealth aircraft, the F-117I thought the F-35 bubbas said stealth doesn't matter if you can target the enemy down-range?
Absolutely spot-on. No Legions of Merit if we keep production lines open and improve capabilities via Block upgrades, right? If the current mode of thinking took place back in the 1960s the B-52s would have been in the graveyard before the draft was over. Look at what the USAF keeps trying to do to the A-10; trying to retire it without any reasonable replacement (for the record, I LOVE the A-10; see "ground-pounder," below).The only problem with the F-22 is cost and the low numbers.
...
That's a huge part of the problem, is low production rates. Production rates and closing production lines have been a sore point for decades.
As I understand it the F-35 was expected to be both the inter-service workhorse and the "F-16" to the F-22 (the "new" F-15).The idea was the F-35 would be that fill in the gap 5th generation aircraft.
But again, cost and delays.
I think the Air Farce has removed the A-10 from active duty squadrons, the close air support mission has been moved to the Guard and Reserves.Absolutely spot-on. No Legions of Merit if we keep production lines open and improve capabilities via Block upgrades, right? If the current mode of thinking took place back in the 1960s the B-52s would have been in the graveyard before the draft was over. Look at what the USAF keeps trying to do to the A-10; trying to retire it without any reasonable replacement (for the record, I LOVE the A-10; see "ground-pounder," below).
As I understand it the F-35 was expected to be both the inter-service workhorse and the "F-16" to the F-22 (the "new" F-15).
But as each of the three user services took a look they realized that one size doesn't fit all. So we now have a hugely expensive aircraft that eventually be great but is now only good. And I don't think it did a good job as a "fill in the gap 5th gen fighter." Maybe 4.5, but 5th gen, not buying it. Being a ground-pounder, though, I am more than willing to admit I'm absolutely incorrect here.
Appreciate your posts on this. Very interesting.
--- End of line (MCP)