The Child Support Solution.

[Josimmon]

I disagree. His right to free speech must be respected. He has not said anything libelous or slanderous. He is a fool of epic proportions and there is no basis for stopping him from proving it everyday.

You are right, he has that right. I just get annoyed that he is using resources that perhaps someone else could be using to find a job, or help with their school.

 

[MMDad]

You are right, he has that right. I just get annoyed that he is using resources that perhaps someone else could be using to find a job, or help with their school.

He claims he is trying to find a job. As delegate. He has no desire to be a productive member of society in the mean time, and no backup plan for when he loses the primary.

 

[Footballfreak]

For goodness sake, is there any other topic to discuss for the 2006 elections? Like lets say educational funding, taxes, abortion, stem cell & growth.

 

[MysticalMom]

For goodness sake, is there any other topic to discuss for the 2006 elections? Like lets say educational funding, taxes, abortion, stem cell & growth.

Start your own thread. :shrug:

 

[Pete]

With 12 months then $500. per month is $6,000. per year and that is not even lower class level. It pillages the paying parent and only gives a pittance to the custodial. Paying $50. per week with 52 weeks per year is $2,600. and it cost the gov $25,000. per year to keep some of this large group of parents in jail and in prison. Each one is $25,000. each, and all the children are fine. No child needs the child support. All the children already have all of their needs already provided and the child support is only to give the custodial extra money. The cost of jail would pay the full child support payment and have plenty left over, per each parent in jail.

First, jail is not the Holiday Inn meant to be a good deal in housing and feeding the stupid. It is meant to take away your freedom as punishment because you are a criminal and make no mistake you are a criminal and morally bankrupt. Our society does not look to jails to make a profit. If it costs $25,000 a year it is worth that to keep criminals off the street.

Next, $25,000 to house you in jail for a year IS a good deal. For every month you are in jail that is a month you cannot go out and impregnate anyone with your stupid seed then abandon them causing them and their spawn to be a burden on society for financial support.

James you must be lying when you said you are deadbroke if you think $6,000 is a “pittance”. You have to be very wealthy. $6,000 a month will pay for half of 52 weeks of daycare; $50 worth of groceries per month; $300 worth of clothes, including coats, shoes, pants, shirts, jackets, socks. $50 worth of school supplies, backpacks, pencils, crayons, folders; $150 worth of school lunches with a whopping 300 left over for other basic items. Not to mention the basics the other parent provides that are not itemized, room in a house, heat, cooling, electricity, driving, insurance co pays.

If you think all this is frivolous you need to prove it. Put your money where your mouth is. Turn down disability payments from the government. You can buy a bowl, and a fork at the dollar store. I have some Taco bell cups you can have. Raman noodles cost .17 cents a pack at Shoppers. Since you don’t work you don’t need to eat 3 times a day, twice would be enough. Water is free and can be found anywhere. So for $124.10 a year you can be fed. The thrift store probably has tons of clothes you could wear cheap. You would only need a change of clothes 3 times a year. Let be generous and say that 4 times a year @ $20 per ensemble. That is $80 plus the $124.10, we are up to $204.10. Lets say you need to take a few showers. You could just violate the law and spend a couple nights in jail once a month to get fed and showers or find a shelter.

See James, you don’t need ALL that disability money, you really only need a couple hundred a year to live off of. The rest of that disability is “extra money” the government is giving you that you will just waste.

 

[fttrsbeerwench]

And besides, all your responses are causing the women of the forum to fall for you all over again.

I didn't know anyone could tell :blush:

 

[Pete]

And besides, all your responses are causing the women of the forum to fall for you all over again.

a collateral benefit

 

[Pete]

I didn't know anyone could tell :blush:

Come to Pete.......

 

[fttrsbeerwench]

Come to Pete.......

Are you ready for this?

 

[ylexot]

If you think all this is frivolous you need to prove it. Put your money where your mouth is. Turn down disability payments from the government. You can buy a bowl, and a fork at the dollar store. I have some Taco bell cups you can have. Raman noodles cost .17 cents a pack at Shoppers. Since you don’t work you don’t need to eat 3 times a day, twice would be enough. Water is free and can be found anywhere. So for $124.10 a year you can be fed. The thrift store probably has tons of clothes you could wear cheap. You would only need a change of clothes 3 times a year. Let be generous and say that 4 times a year @ $20 per ensemble. That is $80 plus the $124.10, we are up to $204.10. Lets say you need to take a few showers. You could just violate the law and spend a couple nights in jail once a month to get fed and showers or find a shelter.

See James, you don’t need ALL that disability money, you really only need a couple hundred a year to live off of. The rest of that disability is “extra money” the government is giving you that you will just waste.

Nice.

 

[Pandora]

Two words,

WORK RELEASE…..

A certain percentage of income goes to pay the jail room and board, the other parts of income go to pay court obligated monies, such as restitution, child support, etc. down the list. I have yet to see a judge NOT authorize work release for child support offenders who are in the arrears, and most will do a reconsideration of sentence if some poor sap comes up & pays the arrearage.


As a matter of fact, there is a forum member who was owed somewhere around 16-18K in child support, they locked his butt up and his mommy came and paid his bill. Wasn't that just sweet of her?

*cough*cough* ENABLER

 

[Chasey_Lane]

See James, you don’t need ALL that disability money, you really only need a couple hundred a year to live off of. The rest of that disability is “extra money” the government is giving you that you will just waste.

Pete, you're on a roll!

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

Are you calling your son a thief?

Well of course not. And I do not call the custodial one either.

I am trying to point out that the child support system is abusive and destructive and needs to be reformed.

-----------------------------

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

Forcing a parent to be responsible is no different than disiplining a child for leaving a skateboard at the top of the stairs. ... ...

There is a big difference because it is equating the government as a "big daddy" and that is a system that must be stopped.

----------------------------

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

I only want to know one thing....... This MF'er called me a thrief...

Can I go down to the library now?

I did not call anybody a thief. It is the child support enforcement that does wrong.

------------------------------

 

[Midnightrider]

No child needs the child support. All the children already have all of their needs already provided and the child support is only to give the custodial extra money.

Spalin dat part to me.

Are you saying all these babies can take care of themselves, or that my taxes are already paying for them, so the parents shouldn't have to?


And before you answer- you are truely a tard, and i sincerly hope you father no more children, seriously!

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

You are a liar.

If each parent made $20K per year according to the guidelines each parent would be obligated to provide $240 per month or aprox $55.81 per week.

LIAR

If the combined income was only $20,000 per year and the man was the only one earning the support payment would be $288 per month or $67 a week.

LIAR

There is NO requirement of 25% to 65% ANYWHERE.

I do not lie. Right here is the link that gives them the power to take (steal) 65 percent of the parents money and leave the parent pillaged and impoverished. About half way down the page here,

Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act for Child Support Garnishment.

Even if most people do not know about the amounts and the abuses, the law and the Courts and the enforcement knows about it, and so do I, 65 percent.

 

[JPC, Sr.]

The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

Spalin dat part to me.

Are you saying all these babies can take care of themselves, or that my taxes are already paying for them, so the parents shouldn't have to?


And before you answer- you are truely a tard, and i sincerly hope you father no more children, seriously!

The child support is only extra money because all the children already have all their needs filled. The child support is overflow.

-------------------------------

 

[Toxick]

I do not lie. Right here is the link that gives them the power to take (steal) 65 percent of the parents money and leave the parent pillaged and impoverished.

Two things.

1) You do lie. Like a rug. Like a beat-up old dilapidated deadbeat rug.

2) This only applies to deadbeads for whom, if they had been paying their child support in the first place, no garnishment will take place at all. It's kind of like getting mad at the Electric Company for shutting you off when you owe them $600 - although if you had paid your $100 a month, there would be no problem. Quit trying to pretend like they'd actually make you pay 65% of your income... the page you cited and the garnishments listed are for arrears.

 

[Pete]

If we have ultimate concern for children then when there is a custody dispute then the law needs to decide which parent already has the money and that parent with the money needs to be given custody. If our concern is for the children then they go to the money and not this fool opposite way. Male and female are equal now. If both parents are working class living paycheck to paycheck then the one with more money gets the kids or maybe joint custody but surely must not give the child to the parent that has less cash or else that is dumping the children. A child can sleep on daddy's couch. Thats okay! Children really eat very little. Small stomach, small mouths. Nobody has to eat steak and shrimp.

If we have ultimate concern for children the non custodial parent would not do everything in their power to dodge paying the ordered support.

The courts in most states appoint a “guardian ad litem”, typically an attorney, psychologist or social worker, to do an investigation and report to the court which one of the parents is in a better position to care for the children instead of making a blind decision. It was not used back when you were divorced but I think it is safe to say that no sane person would EVER give a favorable report on your behalf to adopt a dog let alone raise a child so it would not have helped you at all.

Having ample money does not guarantee that the person is suited to raise a child. . In your case you neither have money nor class so you have no redeeming quality. I am sure your son thanks his lucky stars everyday he didn’t grow up sleeping on your couch eating a handful of kid kibble and living life ashamed that his dad and custodial parent is a crackpot bum who is totally content suckling the teat of governmental generosity.

If you had a conscience at all or more than 2 brain cells floating around the gut bucket you have for a cranium that were not pickled, you would be wracked with unabashed shame that you are such a pitiful waste of human skin that you sired a child, then made no effort to contribute to his up bringing to the point society had to incarcerate you.

Do you get Christmas cards from James P. Cusick Jr.? I hope justice revisits you when your palsy ridden ass is laying all crippled and miserable in a run down nursing home for the indigent in a puddle of your own drool and excrement and James P. Cusick Jr. tells the nurse. “Extra money? For what? He has a small belly and small mouth, he doesn’t really need 4 diapers a day does he? Teeth cleaning? Screw that, just pull them out it is cheaper and he doesn’t eat solid food anymore anyway.