Poor assumption on your part. I have read the complaint and I feel pretty certain others here on the forum have as well.
So it's not so much a "failure to read" as an understanding that this is still a #nothingburger; the result of personal animus and/or political gamesmanship where that animus/political gamesmanship is worded "regally" to make it sound important. Can't help but wonder who helped the complainant write the letter....
The whistleblower has counsel. Perhaps they wrote it. Perhaps the guy really is a CIA agent and has experience "regally" typing things?
Regardless. Is that really something to complain about or something that leads you to automatically toss the complaint? That it was written too nice?
I also wonder if the complainant first went to his/her/xer supervisors. Granted, to lodge an IG complaint it's not required, but it does cause the investigator pause (for a number of reasons; one of which is the IG complaint system is quite frequently used as a weapon by the disgruntled).
If you believe the reports, they did go to their supervisors. According to the NYT, he lodged an anonymous compliant with CIA's general counsel. After that got bounced around the CIA, White House, and DoJ, the whistleblower felt it wasn't being taken seriously and went on to file a whistleblower complaint which offered special legal protections going to CIA general counsel does not.
It's telling that the former executive director of the intelligence community whistle-blowing program said “I always advise whistle-blowers against going to general counsels because the general counsels have to report the matter”.
Speaking of an IG complaint, the complainant could have just as easily lodged one apart from claiming whistleblower status, but at this point it seems (s)(x)he didn't. Why, I wonder? Could it be that a) it wouldn't have gotten the press it did (no doubt, one of the main objectives of the exercise), b) makes the complaint seem more important than it actually is, and c) protects this douchebag? Could it be because the complaint has no merit and that in this case "whistleblower status is the last refuge of a scoundrel"?
See above.
Why do I name this "person" a "douchebag"? Because if this is a big deal, then the entirety of the IC - nay, every government official, Federal on down - belongs in jail. Compared to some of the cases I worked on in an IC IG office* this is so ridiculously a #nothingburger as to merit nothing more from anyone than a) dismissal and derision and b) recognition that it is nothing more than a politically-motivated attempt at a smear.
Maybe it is nothing. But would tyou agree that something this serious should be looked into and not glanced over as a "#nothingburger" simply because you or others don't like the means the person did this, or how well the complaint was typed up.
So feel free, you anti-Trumpers, to continue to live in the house of mirrors that is your #TDS.... And while y'all are busy burning down the house that is this Republic I hope you will pause from your match play to understand the sad reality two can play this game and that some will probably want to/will.... That's the sad state of affairs y'all have put us in. Hope you're happy.
*Wish I could relate some of the cases I worked on or was read-in on in order to provide insight and perspective. Unfortunately, I am bound by a life-long NDA.
--- End of line (MCP)