The Seven Blunders

[High EGT]

How far did you make it in school? Did you ever pass an English class?

No one was equating rights and responsibilities. The "Blunder" is having rights without acting responsible. You actually agree, you're just too stupid to know it.

Take your patently false rhetoric about torture. You say we do it as a routine measure. I say, if we can, we must have that right. You say we don't have that right. Now, follow me here, Jimmy; we have the right to handle anyone any way we want, but we have the responsibility to treat them fairly. See, we're powerful, rich, all the crap you spout routinely. That gives us a lot of personal and international rights. We have the responsibility to act correctly on them.

Now, you're other non-child support neglect example: abortion. Women have the right to do with their bodies as they will - this is truth and (unfortunately) "backed" by the Supreme Court decisions. However, you're saying that the women (and the doctor's involved) have the responsibility to act appropriately to the life in the woman. I agree with your assessment on a big picture scale, but agreement on abortion really isn't the issue. Women have the right, but with that right comes responsibility.

So, in a way, you were right. There's no much disagreement, you just don't realize you agree with reality in this case. You think you don't, but you're wrong even about yourself.

Oh, and by the way, you still haven't answered how the rights of the people NOT to support deadbeat parents' children comes in.

I found somebody who will listen to you and surprising has a better ear then JPC.

 

[This_person]

I found somebody who will listen to you and surprising has a better ear then JPC.

Why does his stupidity get me so worked up?

 

[High EGT]

Why does his stupidity get me so worked up?

Yes, don't you understand? This family has done nothing wrong. It is you, the working taxpayer that needs to be punished for being responsible enough to pay your own way. If you can do that, you certainly need to pay, and make sure that this family, with clearly no responsibility in their actions, can live without providing for themselves. I don't know who you think you are that you think you should only provide for yourself. If you're going to be so cruel and immoral as that, you should provide for this happy, faith-filled (though I have no reason to think they are) family.

After all, the costs of this family (and, all of the families like them, obviously) costs the state of Texas nothing. That money is free, comes from no one, and effects all the other things the state could do NOT AT ALL. The money is magic, and just appears without effecting a taxpayer, a tax-rate, nor anything else the state does.

You're clearly just jealous that they're a young family making babies without any responsibility.

I honestly think your better suited for then trying to enlighten an ostrich with his head in the sand.

 

[This_person]

I honestly think your better suited for then trying to enlighten an ostrich with his head in the sand.

I will admit, I've learned sarcasm from some of the best. I currently have three teenagers, with one in the wings.