This is a great thread:

Nickel

curiouser and curiouser
It is inapproprate to make a life sentence for rape.

Maybe the repeat rate is 99%, but i am concerned about making sure the 1% who won't repeat don't get unfairly penalised.

This compromise means the dumb frat boy who got drunk and raped some girl passed out on his bed will do an appropraite sentence for rape, but not face a life sentence. This guy is probably not going to repeat offend.

And the civil commitment procedure could/should be able to distinguish.
Jesus save us, the country is being overtaken by imbeciles. :ohwell:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Here's another one that will probably go *poof*:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1536009

Ripley said:
Do you think the father couldn't tell the difference between pedophilia and naked baby pictures of his own child?

But hopefully the sick #### can get a quick rehabilitation and then go move across the street from a day care center or schoolyard just to please the oh so liberal amongst us.
They do love their pedophiles over there, that's for sure. :ohwell:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
valis said:
Did he actually MOLEST anybody? If not, what's the big deal? Why could not they resolve it with some social worker within the family? Why didn't the police discuss it with the family only?
Wowzer.
 

jazz lady

~*~ Rara Avis ~*~
PREMO Member
Vrai

:offtopic: but can we get this smilie....PLEASE.






:lmao:
 

Attachments

  • sarcasm.gif
    sarcasm.gif
    341 bytes · Views: 96

Nickel

curiouser and curiouser
jazz lady said:
But I posted the image. :neener: And it's "dripping" sarcasm. :razz: :lmao:
I thought "raining" sounded more festive...ya know, like "It's raining men" or something like that. :shrug:






:dork:
 

jazz lady

~*~ Rara Avis ~*~
PREMO Member
vraiblonde said:
More wowzer...

sweetheart said:
I'm not sold

Porno is in the mind of the perceiver, and i can't conceive of ANY
photo of a 2 years old, in ANY position that is the least bit
sexually provocative. Heck, my mum had picture of my poopy bum when
she was changing diapers, and in the hands of a porno expert, surely
those were sexually explicit photos by a poopy-bum fanatic, but really
they were photos of what a mother sees whilst changing a diaper.

The grandpa has not molested the child, and it strikes me that one
persons photo of a nakid baby is another persons pornography, and this
is the problem... that we must sanitize our lives, and erase our
private bits from our family photos for fear that they'll be put on
television to create a nationwide stink.
UFB :duh:
 
Last edited:

jazz lady

~*~ Rara Avis ~*~
PREMO Member
"sweetheart" continues....
Ok, so he masturbated And that is not a crime... nor is being turned on by something that is socially taboo. Some people get turned on by war, really, that killing people makes them hot for a shag. So should we throw soldiers who masturbate after a kill in to the clink?
Um, HELLO!!! It IS a crime called pedophilia. :dork:
 
Top