BuddyLee said:
You want a specific location? Fine, give me a topographical map, a geological survey of the area, a road/railway map, a land value map, a population density map, current and projected freight throughput, and a few grand and I'll pick a place.
BuddyLee said:
Plus, isn't this a hypocritical idea to offer, being a conservative? Which piece of the Gulf coast are you going to communize? Are you willing to spend all the money for all the lawyers, court cases, and any other red tape to follow?
Ummm, no. Land gets bought and new port is built. Communize...WTF are you talking about?
BuddyLee said:
This idea flows well with the 'port' revenue that NO obtains. 2A's idea is a little more sound but we might lose that major port revenue by moving upstream.
I still don't know what you are talking about port revenue for. We're not talking about moving the port to the other side of the country. We're talking about moving it a couple miles. Port revenue will be practically identical and may even be more if it is designed/built correctly. I have no idea why you think there would be a loss of port revenue.
BuddyLee said:
NO also gets a large bulk of money from tourists who want to see this American historic city, goodbye to that as well.

NO has three things that people go there for...jazz, cajun cuisine, and drinking...all of which can be done elsewhere. Very few care about the history. For those that do care, motorboat tours leave on the hour and scuba tours depart twice a day.
BuddyLee said:
So say Baltimore goes under water. The city needs rebuilt, they choose St. Mary's, you would be pissed, no?
Would I be pissed? Hell no! Gee, what would be my response? Oh yeah...JACKPOT! Land value skyrockets, I cash out and move elsewhere.