To The Candidates.

J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
:coffee: This is info from a letter apparently sent to all candidates in the 2006 elections and I think it is worth sharing here.

There is no copy right, no restrictions, and some small changes have been made for clarity.
====================

An Important Message from Maryland Business.

During this election season, more and more special interest will send the political candidates questionnaires to try to determine where they stand on various issues. Some organizations have also started to send petitions or ask candidates to support or oppose an idea "in concept" without any detail. These latter groups are trying to get candidates to take a public position without giving the candidates specifics.

Signing petitions without first looking at the details of the proposal, hearing both sides of the issue, and listening to the analysts in State government is in nobody's best interest.

We ask that during this election season, candidates refrain from signing any petition, no matter how worthy the cause may seem "in concept" or otherwise. When the winning candidate gets to Annapolis, listen to the facts. Hear the experts. Examine and analyze the details of any proposal. Then cast the vote.

Holding legislators hostage to promises made without complete facts or the whole story is in no one's best interest.

Message from,
Maryland Retailer's Association,
Maryland Service Station Dealers,
Mid-Atlantic Petroleum Council,
Maryland New Car and Truck Dealer's Association.

====================

[As said before, no copyright - no restrictions to message.] :howdy:
 
R

residentofcre

Guest
JPC said:
:coffee: This is info from a letter apparently sent to all candidates in the 2006 elections and I think it is worth sharing here.

There is no copy right, no restrictions, and some small changes have been made for clarity.
====================

An Important Message from Maryland Business.

During this election season, more and more special interest will send the political candidates questionnaires to try to determine where they stand on various issues. Some organizations have also started to send petitions or ask candidates to support or oppose an idea "in concept" without any detail. These latter groups are trying to get candidates to take a public position without giving the candidates specifics.

Signing petitions without first looking at the details of the proposal, hearing both sides of the issue, and listening to the analysts in State government is in nobody's best interest.

We ask that during this election season, candidates refrain from signing any petition, no matter how worthy the cause may seem "in concept" or otherwise. When the winning candidate gets to Annapolis, listen to the facts. Hear the experts. Examine and analyze the details of any proposal. Then cast the vote.

Holding legislators hostage to promises made without complete facts or the whole story is in no one's best interest.

Message from,
Maryland Retailer's Association,
Maryland Service Station Dealers,
Mid-Atlantic Petroleum Council,
Maryland New Car and Truck Dealer's Association.

====================

[As said before, no copyright - no restrictions to message.] :howdy:

Are you filling out the questionairs and taking money from these people?

It would be really excellent, as I said, if the candidates could run a clean campaign and only accept donations from those who believe in the candidate. I have had the issues that were important to me from the beginning posted on my webpage and website since January.

I have been filling out forms for a few weeks now. My answers have been honest and if the group likes what I stand for by my answers then they will endorse me.

I just wish they would support me in the primary with signs and mailers because the field is so large that I don't stand much of chance if you gage by litter on a stick and backing by big business.

JPC... giving an honest answer is the only way to get the word out at this point. I wouldn't mind being held hostage to my honest opinion. :coffee:
 

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
JPC said:
During this election season, more and more special interest will send the political candidates questionnaires to try to determine where they stand on various issues.
So, do you expect to receive questionnaires from groups that support driving away the Pax NAS and dismantling child support enforcement? (Writing and sending a questionnaire to yourself does not count.)

Secondly, I am curious why you would post the rest of this letter, because it absolutely does not apply to you.
JPC said:
When the winning candidate gets to Annapolis,...
This will never be you.

JPC said:
listen to the facts.
You have never done this.

JPC said:
Hear the experts.
You have never done this.

JPC said:
Examine and analyze the details of any proposal.
Your brain is too little to allow you to do this.

JPC said:
Then cast the vote.
You have already made up your mind, seeing yourself as the only one who is right. Everyone else is just a stupid sheep, right JPC?
 
R

residentofcre

Guest
residentofcre said:
Are you filling out the questionairs and taking money from these people?

It would be really excellent, as I said, if the candidates could run a clean campaign and only accept donations from those who believe in the candidate. I have had the issues that were important to me from the beginning posted on my webpage and website since January.

I have been filling out forms for a few weeks now. My answers have been honest and if the group likes what I stand for by my answers then they will endorse me.

I just wish they would support me in the primary with signs and mailers because the field is so large that I don't stand much of chance if you gage by litter on a stick and backing by big business.

JPC... giving an honest answer is the only way to get the word out at this point. I wouldn't mind being held hostage to my honest opinion. :coffee:

JPC... I received a number of those questionaires... I have enjoyed filling them out. I found them quite thought provoking.

I have been talking with the authors of several of those questionaires as well and they tell me that there are candidates elect not to submit answers.

I haven't seen any letters from a group explaining why they aren't sending our questionaires. I notice you said "small changes have been made for clarity". I would like to see the original letter. :coffee:
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Wizard!

residentofcre said:
JPC... I received a number of those questionaires... I have enjoyed filling them out. I found them quite thought provoking.

I have been talking with the authors of several of those questionaires as well and they tell me that there are candidates elect not to submit answers.
:whistle: I get lots of the questionnaires from many special interest groups asking questions so if the candidate (me) agrees with their policies then the group will give an endorsement.

I do not fill out any of the questionnaires. I find that the obvious intent of the special interest groups to be rather irritating because it appears that what they really are asking and expecting is for the candidates to give endorsement to their cause and not the other way around.
residentofrce said:
I haven't seen any letters from a group explaining why they aren't sending our questionaires. I notice you said "small changes have been made for clarity". I would like to see the original letter. :coffee:
:larry: The letter was sent to my campaign P.O. Box and a copy probably went to every registered candidate because is a form processed type mail. The return address was, "Maryland Retailer's Association" in a white envelope. Maybe it only went to St. Mary's candidates but I find that unlikely. When I said "small changes were made for clarity" all those were changing the first person singular pronoun of the word "you" and changed it to "political candidate" and just "candidates" so that it shows the letter was not sent to the public in general like those here on the Forum but the letter was sent to "candidates".
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
residentofcre said:
I wouldn't mind being held hostage to my honest opinion.
That's you, Becky, and not the majority of politicians. Once you make a public stand on an issue, you can't easily switch sides if the opposition offers you more money. :lol:
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Wizard!

ylexot said:
I would have thought that you would be all for this law :confused:
:larry: I never did like the Wal-art bill. It appears to violate the free enterprise concept, and I saw it as the legislature pushing a governmental problem onto Walmart.

If we want available and affordable health care then sticking the problem onto big businesses like Walmart is far from a responsible solution.

I think that bill was mis-guided from the first place to the last, so I am pleased that the Federal Court overturned it.

:yay: My own idea (still needs work) would be to give Doctors a liability insurance scale and make it public knowledge so patients will know the scale level of each Doctor before they walk in the Doctor's office.

For instance, a high class Doctor that would work on the very rich patients (Donald Trump or Britney Spears) would have liability insurance of $100. million or more, but a Doctor that worked with the poor could have liability coverage of $100,000. and then many different levels in between, like a middle level Doctor at $1.M, - $10.M, in liability insurance.

Many working class people just want a do it quick Doctor and go home, and many Doctors became Doctors because they want to help the general population and to provide a real Doctor service to the working classes and not cater and pander to the spoiled rich.

So making the liability doable and affordable and making the scale public knowledge will make more Doctors available to the general public which is what we need in health care.

That is not part of my platform but I like that idea for review. :whistle:
 

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
JPC said:
:larry: I never did like the Wal-art bill. It appears to violate the free enterprise concept, and I saw it as the legislature pushing a governmental problem onto Walmart.

If we want available and affordable health care then sticking the problem onto big businesses like Walmart is far from a responsible solution.

I think that bill was mis-guided from the first place to the last, so I am pleased that the Federal Court overturned it.

:yay: My own idea (still needs work) would be to give Doctors a liability insurance scale and make it public knowledge so patients will know the scale level of each Doctor before they walk in the Doctor's office.

For instance, a high class Doctor that would work on the very rich patients (Donald Trump or Britney Spears) would have liability insurance of $100. million or more, but a Doctor that worked with the poor could have liability coverage of $100,000. and then many different levels in between, like a middle level Doctor at $1.M, - $10.M, in liability insurance.

Many working class people just want a do it quick Doctor and go home, and many Doctors became Doctors because they want to help the general population and to provide a real Doctor service to the working classes and not cater and pander to the spoiled rich.

So making the liability doable and affordable and making the scale public knowledge will make more Doctors available to the general public which is what we need in health care.

That is not part of my platform but I like that idea for review. :whistle:
so if you are rich your life and limb are worth a thousand times more than if you are poor? thats one of the most retard ideas you have ever had, and thats saying something
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Wizard!

Midnightrider said:
so if you are rich your life and limb are worth a thousand times more than if you are poor? thats one of the most retard ideas you have ever had, and thats saying something
:larry: The way that I figure it, then the rich class Doctor would cost much more (as they do now) so the rich have higher liability coverage because they pay more. Then the working person's Doctor might cost $20. to $100. per half hour visit, and the rich class Doctor will cost $1,000. and up per hour visit. So the rich could still go to a low coverage Doctor and the poor and general population could still go to the rich Doctor if they can afford it - or if their insurance will pay for it.

According to the Doctor's position it is that their Doctor's liability insurance cost is what drives way up the Doctor's prices and it keeps many low income patients out.

Also medicine and medical schools have shorter and easier criterias to become a Doctor because medicine has become much more of an established science with more solid set rules and procedures and less art and talent being necessary for becoming a Doctor. Plus there are specialist that have some higher grading and many lower levels for Doctors. So a general practicianer does not need the high liability that a heart surgeon needs to maintain.

So in this way the rich person's life and limb is not worth more then a poor person's life and body but the rich will pay more and so the rich do get more insurance coverage. Then us poor folk can pay less for more reasonable cost and coverage too. I think it would work and it would solve many of society's health care issues of affordability and availability.
:whistle:
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Wizard!

This questionnaire was sent email to me by the Maryland Right to Life (MDRTL) org.
=======================

2006 STATE CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE

Under what circumstances, if any, do you believe that
abortion should be legal?

_______ Only to prevent the death of the mother
(the MDRTL position).

_______ To prevent the mother’s death, in cases of
incest, and in reported cases of forcible rape.

Other: (please explain) ______________________

NOTE: In every question, a "yes" response indicates
agreement with the position of Maryland Right to Life.

ROE V. WADE
(1) Do you support the complete and immediate
reversal of the Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton
decisions, thereby allowing the state legislatures
and the Congress once again to protect unborn
children?
YES _______ NO _________

PARENTAL NOTIFICATION
(2) Would you support a bill that would require
parental involvement prior to a minor obtaining
an abortion?
YES _______ NO _________

THE PAIN OF UNBORN BABIES
(3) Would you support legislation to require that
any mother considering an abortion first must
be provided with clear and accurate information
about the capacity of an unborn child to feel
pain, and about possible alternatives to lessen or
avoid that pain?
YES _______ NO _________

UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE

Maryland has an imperfect unborn victim’s of
violence law which unfortunately only provides
partial recognition since it only recognizes the
“viable” unborn child.

(4) Would you support any attempt to
strengthen this law so that the unborn child
would be recognized as a second victimregardless of his or her gestational age?
YES _______ NO _________


ABORTION FUNDING
(5) Would you vote to prevent the use of tax funds
for abortion other than to prevent the death of the
mother?
YES _______ NO _________

(6) If it was not possible to pass the law described
in #5, would you vote to prevent the use of tax
funds for abortion other than to prevent the death
of the mother, when the pregnancy is the result of
forcible rape (reported to law enforcement
agencies within 7 days), or when the pregnancy of
a minor is the result of incest (when the perpetrator is reported to a law enforcement agency)?
YES _______ NO _________

WOMAN’S RIGHT TO KNOW
The development of her unborn child before making this
permanent and life-affecting decision.

(7) Would you support a law requiring women be
given the information described above, at least 24
hours prior to an abortion being performed?
YES _______ NO _________

STEM CELL RESEARCH
What is your position on stem cell research.

_______ Only adult stem cell research (including
umbilical cord blood) should be permitted

_______ All types of stem cell research, including
embryonic research, should be permitted.

Other: (please explain)_______________________

PROTECTION OF HUMAN EMBRYOS
(8) Will you vote for measures to protect living
human embryos from being used for medical
experiments that would harm or kill them,
including so-called “embryonic stem cell research”
that would require the killing of human embryos,
regardless of the method used to create these
human embryos?
YES _______ NO _________

HUMAN CLONING
In Congress, the Brownback-Landrieu and Weldon-Stupak bills
(S. 658 and H.R. 1357) would prohibit the use of
somatic cell nuclear transfer (cloning) to create any
humans, including human embryos.
(9) Would you support a similar legal prohibition
on all human cloning on a state level, including the
creation of human embryos by cloning?
YES _______ NO _________


(10) Would you oppose state legislation that would
permit the creation of human embryos by cloning
but in effect require the death of each such embryo
(that is, legislation to “ban reproductive cloning”
but to simultaneously permit so called
“therapeutic cloning”)?
YES _______ NO _________

(11) Would you support legislation that would
prevent “fetus farming” in humans, by prohibiting
establishing a human pregnancy for any purpose
other than intending a live birth.
YES _______ NO _________

EUTHANASIA
(12) If the patient, while competent, had requested
food and fluids, should they be administered?
_______ YES, health care providers should continue
to provide food and fluids (MDRTL position).

_______ NO, health care providers should be allowed
to decide whether to continue food and fluids.

_______ Other (please explain): ______________

(13) If a patient, while competent, had not made
his or her wishes known, should food and fluids be
administered?
_______ YES, health care providers should continue
to provide food and fluids (MDRTL position).

_______ NO, health care providers should be allowed
to decide whether to continue food and fluids.

_______ Other (please explain): ______________

INVOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA
(14 ) State law currently protects against the
involuntary denial of lifesaving medical treatment
by providing that if failure to comply with a
patient’s or surrogate’s choice for lifesaving
treatment would in reasonable medical judgment
be likely to result in the patient’s death, a health
care provider unwilling to respect the choice for
lifesaving treatment must allow the patient to be
transferred to a willing provider and must provide
treatment pending transfer. Will you vote against
repealing or weakening this law?
YES _______ NO _________


(15) In 1991, Oregon approved a health care (16) Would you support a law to prevent
rationing plan for its Medicaid program. An “assisting suicide” by allowing relatives or
important factor in denial of treatment is the others affected by an attempted or completed
expected degree of disability or poor “quality of suicide, as well as public officials, to sue the
life” it is claimed a patient would be likely to have person who "assists" for money damages and
after treatment. This is a form of involuntary to obtain an injunction against future attemptseuthanasia. Would you vote to oppose any by that person to assist suicides?

legislation in this state that, like the Oregon plan,
would impose rationing that intentionally denies YES _______ NO _________
treatment on the basis of disability or "quality of
Oregon has adopted a law affirmatively legalizing
life" of those denied treatment?


prescription of lethal drugs to assist suicide in certain
YES _______ NO _________ cases.

(17) Would you oppose the legalization of assisting
suicide through lethal prescription as under the
Oregon law?
YES _______ NO _________

:whistle:
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Wizard!

residentofcre said:
JPC... did you fill it out and mail it in?
:larry: No I did not and I am not going to.

I do not like the premesis of asking for diffinitive answers of "yes" or "no" and give no room for comments or explanations.

I have only done surveys that ask me what my position is and leave the space blank for my own comment.

Plus I think abortion must be controled and restricted and start teaching people to value babies and childbirth instead of making the nature reproduction into the negative concept that poor and young people see it as now. If we make a 48 hour waiting period for abortions then at least the parent can think before committing the tragedy. Then too in 48 hours maybe some one could show the parents that the babies are a blessing from God and not a burden that needs to be destroyed.

So for me those big huge issues are just not "yes or no" questions. :jameo:
 

bcp

In My Opinion
JPC said:
This questionnaire was sent email to me by the Maryland Right to Life (MDRTL) org.
=======================

2006 STATE CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE

Under what circumstances, if any, do you believe that
abortion should be legal?

To prevent the mother’s death, in cases of
incest, and in reported cases of forcible rape.




ROE V. WADE
(1) Do you support the complete and immediate
reversal of the Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton
decisions, thereby allowing the state legislatures
and the Congress once again to protect unborn
children?
YES

PARENTAL NOTIFICATION
(2) Would you support a bill that would require
parental involvement prior to a minor obtaining
an abortion?
YES

THE PAIN OF UNBORN BABIES
(3) Would you support legislation to require that
any mother considering an abortion first must
be provided with clear and accurate information
about the capacity of an unborn child to feel
pain, and about possible alternatives to lessen or
avoid that pain?
YES

UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE

Maryland has an imperfect unborn victim’s of
violence law which unfortunately only provides
partial recognition since it only recognizes the
“viable” unborn child.

(4) Would you support any attempt to
strengthen this law so that the unborn child
would be recognized as a second victimregardless of his or her gestational age?
YES


ABORTION FUNDING
(5) Would you vote to prevent the use of tax funds
for abortion other than to prevent the death of the
mother?
YES

(6) If it was not possible to pass the law described
in #5, would you vote to prevent the use of tax
funds for abortion other than to prevent the death
of the mother, when the pregnancy is the result of
forcible rape (reported to law enforcement
agencies within 7 days), or when the pregnancy of
a minor is the result of incest (when the perpetrator is reported to a law enforcement agency)?
NO

WOMAN’S RIGHT TO KNOW
The development of her unborn child before making this
permanent and life-affecting decision.

(7) Would you support a law requiring women be
given the information described above, at least 24
hours prior to an abortion being performed?
YES

STEM CELL RESEARCH
What is your position on stem cell research.

Only adult stem cell research (including
umbilical cord blood) should be permitted


PROTECTION OF HUMAN EMBRYOS
(8) Will you vote for measures to protect living
human embryos from being used for medical
experiments that would harm or kill them,
including so-called “embryonic stem cell research”
that would require the killing of human embryos,
regardless of the method used to create these
human embryos?
YES

HUMAN CLONING
In Congress, the Brownback-Landrieu and Weldon-Stupak bills
(S. 658 and H.R. 1357) would prohibit the use of
somatic cell nuclear transfer (cloning) to create any
humans, including human embryos.
(9) Would you support a similar legal prohibition
on all human cloning on a state level, including the
creation of human embryos by cloning?
YES


(10) Would you oppose state legislation that would
permit the creation of human embryos by cloning
but in effect require the death of each such embryo
(that is, legislation to “ban reproductive cloning”
but to simultaneously permit so called
“therapeutic cloning”)?
NO

(11) Would you support legislation that would
prevent “fetus farming” in humans, by prohibiting
establishing a human pregnancy for any purpose
other than intending a live birth.
YES

EUTHANASIA
(12) If the patient, while competent, had requested
food and fluids, should they be administered?
YES, health care providers should continue
to provide food and fluids (MDRTL position).



(13) If a patient, while competent, had not made
his or her wishes known, should food and fluids be
administered?
YES, health care providers should continue
to provide food and fluids (MDRTL position).


INVOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA
(14 ) State law currently protects against the
involuntary denial of lifesaving medical treatment
by providing that if failure to comply with a
patient’s or surrogate’s choice for lifesaving
treatment would in reasonable medical judgment
be likely to result in the patient’s death, a health
care provider unwilling to respect the choice for
lifesaving treatment must allow the patient to be
transferred to a willing provider and must provide
treatment pending transfer. Will you vote against
repealing or weakening this law?
YES


(15) In 1991, Oregon approved a health care (16) Would you support a law to prevent
rationing plan for its Medicaid program. An “assisting suicide” by allowing relatives or
important factor in denial of treatment is the others affected by an attempted or completed
expected degree of disability or poor “quality of suicide, as well as public officials, to sue the
life” it is claimed a patient would be likely to have person who "assists" for money damages and
after treatment. This is a form of involuntary to obtain an injunction against future attemptseuthanasia. Would you vote to oppose any by that person to assist suicides?

legislation in this state that, like the Oregon plan,
would impose rationing that intentionally denies

treatment on the basis of disability or "quality of
Oregon has adopted a law affirmatively legalizing
life" of those denied treatment?


prescription of lethal drugs to assist suicide in certain cases.
YES

(17) Would you oppose the legalization of assisting
suicide through lethal prescription as under the
Oregon law?
NO
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Wizard!

2006 STATE CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE

Under what circumstances, if any, do you believe that
abortion should be legal?

_______ Only to prevent the death of the mother
(the MDRTL position).

_______ To prevent the mother’s death, in cases of
incest, and in reported cases of forcible rape.

Other: (please explain) 48 hour waiting period

NOTE: In every question, a "yes" response indicates
agreement with the position of Maryland Right to Life.

ROE V. WADE
(1) Do you support the complete and immediate
reversal of the Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton
decisions, thereby allowing the state legislatures
and the Congress once again to protect unborn
children?
YES _______ NO _________ We need to do it slow.

PARENTAL NOTIFICATION
(2) Would you support a bill that would require
parental involvement prior to a minor obtaining
an abortion?
YES _______ NO __ No, police notification.

THE PAIN OF UNBORN BABIES
(3) Would you support legislation to require that
any mother considering an abortion first must
be provided with clear and accurate information
about the capacity of an unborn child to feel
pain, and about possible alternatives to lessen or
avoid that pain?
YES _______ NO _____ Maybe / probably.

UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE

Maryland has an imperfect unborn victim’s of
violence law which unfortunately only provides
partial recognition since it only recognizes the
“viable” unborn child.

(4) Would you support any attempt to
strengthen this law so that the unborn child
would be recognized as a second victimregardless of his or her gestational age?
YES _______ NO ___Only if the perpetrator knew it.


ABORTION FUNDING
(5) Would you vote to prevent the use of tax funds
for abortion other than to prevent the death of the
mother?
YES _______ NO _____ Undecided.

(6) If it was not possible to pass the law described
in #5, would you vote to prevent the use of tax
funds for abortion other than to prevent the death
of the mother, when the pregnancy is the result of
forcible rape (reported to law enforcement
agencies within 7 days), or when the pregnancy of
a minor is the result of incest (when the perpetrator is reported to a law enforcement agency)?
YES __ NO __ I vote for education of parent instead.

WOMAN’S RIGHT TO KNOW
The development of her unborn child before making this
permanent and life-affecting decision.

(7) Would you support a law requiring women be
given the information described above, at least 24
hours prior to an abortion being performed?
YES _______ NO _____ I think so.

STEM CELL RESEARCH
What is your position on stem cell research.

Yes_ Only adult stem cell research (including
umbilical cord blood) should be permitted

No.____ All types of stem cell research, including
embryonic research, should be permitted.

Other: (please explain)_______________________

PROTECTION OF HUMAN EMBRYOS
(8) Will you vote for measures to protect living
human embryos from being used for medical
experiments that would harm or kill them,
including so-called “embryonic stem cell research”
that would require the killing of human embryos,
regardless of the method used to create these
human embryos?
YES Yes___ NO _________

HUMAN CLONING
In Congress, the Brownback-Landrieu and Weldon-Stupak bills
(S. 658 and H.R. 1357) would prohibit the use of
somatic cell nuclear transfer (cloning) to create any
humans, including human embryos.
(9) Would you support a similar legal prohibition
on all human cloning on a state level, including the
creation of human embryos by cloning?
YES _______ NO _________ Undecided


(10) Would you oppose state legislation that would
permit the creation of human embryos by cloning
but in effect require the death of each such embryo
(that is, legislation to “ban reproductive cloning”
but to simultaneously permit so called
“therapeutic cloning”)?
YES _______ NO ______I oppose it.

(11) Would you support legislation that would
prevent “fetus farming” in humans, by prohibiting
establishing a human pregnancy for any purpose
other than intending a live birth.
YES _______ NO _________ Agree

EUTHANASIA
(12) If the patient, while competent, had requested
food and fluids, should they be administered?
_______ YES, health care providers should continue
to provide food and fluids (MDRTL position). Unknown

_______ NO, health care providers should be allowed to decide
whether to continue food and fluids. Undecided

____ Other (please explain): ___Family involvement.

(13) If a patient, while competent, had not made
his or her wishes known, should food and fluids be
administered?
_______ YES, health care providers should continue
to provide food and fluids (MDRTL position).

_______ NO, health care providers should be allowed
to decide whether to continue food and fluids.

____ Other (please explain): _____ Need more facts.

INVOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA
(14 ) State law currently protects against the
involuntary denial of lifesaving medical treatment
by providing that if failure to comply with a
patient’s or surrogate’s choice for lifesaving
treatment would in reasonable medical judgment
be likely to result in the patient’s death, a health
care provider unwilling to respect the choice for
lifesaving treatment must allow the patient to be
transferred to a willing provider and must provide
treatment pending transfer. Will you vote against
repealing or weakening this law?
YES _______ NO _____ Undecided.


(15) In 1991, Oregon approved a health care (16) Would you support a law to prevent
rationing plan for its Medicaid program. An “assisting suicide” by allowing relatives or
important factor in denial of treatment is the others affected by an attempted or completed
expected degree of disability or poor “quality of suicide, as well as public officials, to sue the
life” it is claimed a patient would be likely to have person who "assists" for money damages and
after treatment. This is a form of involuntary to obtain an injunction against future attemptseuthanasia. Would you vote to oppose any by that person to assist suicides?

legislation in this state that, like the Oregon plan,
would impose rationing that intentionally denies YES _______ NO _________
treatment on the basis of disability or "quality of
Oregon has adopted a law affirmatively legalizing
life" of those denied treatment?This is incoherant, probably distorted in the copy / paste process, so no answer either.


prescription of lethal drugs to assist suicide in certain
YES _______ NO _________ cases. Maybe.

(17) Would you oppose the legalization of assisting
suicide through lethal prescription as under the
Oregon law?
YES _______ NO _________ Undecided.

:whistle:
 

ylexot

Super Genius
JPC said:
PARENTAL NOTIFICATION
(2) Would you support a bill that would require
parental involvement prior to a minor obtaining
an abortion?
YES _______ NO __ No, police notification.
:confused: You want to notify the police if a minor wants to have an abortion? What are they supposed to do?
 
B

Bronwyn

Guest
Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.
PARENTAL NOTIFICATION
(2) Would you support a bill that would require
parental involvement prior to a minor obtaining
an abortion?
YES _______ NO __ No, police notification.


:bigwhoop: Who are the police going to arrest?
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Wizard!

ylexot said:
:confused: You want to notify the police if a minor wants to have an abortion? What are they supposed to do?
:larry: Well it is against the law for most people to impregnate a minor, and so the police would need to learn who the father was so to see if a crime had been committed. Plus notifying the parents (including step parents) is in some cases notifying the perpetrator of the criminal pregnancy. Thus the police would need to notify the parents to see if they knew who impregnated the child and or to see if those parents were accomplices in the crime.

And in many cases with a minor child it is the parents (and or step parents) that bring the minor in and they pay for the abortion so the parents could easily be covering up a crime by getting the child to have an abortion.

Thus the police need to be informed when a minor wants an abortion. :whistle:
 
Top