Top Democrat: Bring back the draft

scottrobts

New Member
PsyOps said:
Charles Rangel is nothing more than a WAR MONGER

wouldn't call him a war monger, I just think his methods for achieving his goals (reducing the chance of soldiers being sent to war, evening the representation in the military between the classes of society) are more then a bit flawed.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
scottrobts said:
wouldn't call him a war monger, I just think his methods for achieving his goals (reducing the chance of soldiers being sent to war, evening the representation in the military between the classes of society) are more then a bit flawed.
Well, I was actually being sarcastic. But the reality is Rangel's push for this isn't born in reality. He is just trying to make the point that we don't have enough troops to fight on all these fronts so, therefore, if we aren't willing to institute the draft we need to pull out of Iraq.

When the dems are bent on providing us with daily body counts you really believe Rangel wants to add more to that?
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
chernmax said:
It better mean Woman can get drafted just like men!!! :whistle:

I think if the draft was returned, the government would have white college kids (girls and boys) and lower-class people pulled in. Although it would be nice to see Paris Hilton over in Iraq with an AK-47 in her hand. That'll never happen. It'll come down to whoever has the $$$ doesn't go to war.
 

scottrobts

New Member
AndyMarquisLIVE said:
I think if the draft was returned, the government would have white college kids (girls and boys) and lower-class people pulled in. Although it would be nice to see Paris Hilton over in Iraq with an AK-47 in her hand. That'll never happen. It'll come down to whoever has the $$$ doesn't go to war.

Women aren't required to register for Selective Service, so they won't be drafted.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
PsyOps said:
Well, I was actually being sarcastic. But the reality is Rangel's push for this isn't born in reality. He is just trying to make the point that we don't have enough troops to fight on all these fronts so, therefore, if we aren't willing to institute the draft we need to pull out of Iraq.

When the dems are bent on providing us with daily body counts you really believe Rangel wants to add more to that?

Great point, I actually agree with this...

I just think Charlie Rangel is suffering from FIM (Foot In Mouth) Disorder.
 

chernmax

NOT Politically Correct!!
PsyOps said:
Well, I was actually being sarcastic. But the reality is Rangel's push for this isn't born in reality. He is just trying to make the point that we don't have enough troops to fight on all these fronts so, therefore, if we aren't willing to institute the draft we need to pull out of Iraq.

When the dems are bent on providing us with daily body counts you really believe Rangel wants to add more to that?


Here some statistics and conclusions.

If you consider that there has been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq theater of operations during the last 22 months, and a total of 2,112 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000 soldiers.

The firearm death rate in Washington , D.C. is 80.6 per 100,000 for the same period.

That means that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and killed in the U.S. Capitol, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, than you are in Iraq.

Conclusion: The U.S. should pull out of Washington . :whistle:
 

Vince

......
chernmax said:
Here some statistics and conclusions.

If you consider that there has been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq theater of operations during the last 22 months, and a total of 2,112 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000 soldiers.

The firearm death rate in Washington , D.C. is 80.6 per 100,000 for the same period.

That means that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and killed in the U.S. Capitol, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, than you are in Iraq.

Conclusion: The U.S. should pull out of Washington . :whistle:
Nah. If enough of those idiots in DC that are making the gun laws get shot, maybe we'll get some in office that will change the gun laws.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
chernmax said:
Here some statistics and conclusions.

If you consider that there has been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq theater of operations during the last 22 months, and a total of 2,112 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000 soldiers.

The firearm death rate in Washington , D.C. is 80.6 per 100,000 for the same period.

That means that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and killed in the U.S. Capitol, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, than you are in Iraq.

Conclusion: The U.S. should pull out of Washington . :whistle:
Maybe this is why Rangel wants the draft. Not in Iraq but in his own backyard; he doesn't feel safe. :shocking:
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
AndyMarquisLIVE said:
I think if the draft was returned, the government would have white college kids (girls and boys) and lower-class people pulled in. Although it would be nice to see Paris Hilton over in Iraq with an AK-47 in her hand. That'll never happen. It'll come down to whoever has the $$$ doesn't go to war.
To include any kin to Charles Rangel.
 

BuddyLee

Football addict
BuddyLee said:
Hmmmm...I wonder if the public would have a say. I think it would be largely unpopular and would kill the Democrats chances in 08'.
<TABLE class=tborder cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY id=collapseobj_usercp_reputation><TR><TD class=alt2>
reputation_balance.gif
</TD><TD class=alt1Active id=p1799897 width="50%">Top Democrat: Bring bac...</TD><TD class=alt2 noWrap>11-20-2006 05:29 AM</TD><TD class=alt1 width="50%">doesnt matter what party those people are for, they are all crooked, get a clue</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I didn't see any crazy googly-eyed Republicans calling for a draft.
 
Top