Trump 2020 election

Dakota

~~~~~~~
U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg issued a 135-page ruling last Friday in the long-running lawsuit seeking to rid Georgia of its electronic voting machines in favor of hand-marked paper ballots. The lawsuit, filed by individual voters and election security advocacy group the Coalition for Good Governance, argues that the machine's cybersecurity flaws violate the constitutional rights of voters to cast their votes and have those votes accurately counted.

 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
said 𝘡𝘰 𝘣𝘦 the most 𝘴𝘦𝘀𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘒𝘯π˜₯ 𝘒𝘀𝘀𝘢𝘳𝘒𝘡e by MSM

Not true.

Trump has won 23 out of the 31 cases based on merits (or 74%)

Many other cases pending with dates TBD.

You can follow along here


LOLOL

This is completely bias and and means nothing.

  • The Trump campaign commissioned a firm to probe the 2020 election, but researchers came up empty, per The WaPo.
  • Roughly a dozen people at the Berkeley Research Group were part of a team analyzing Trump's claims.
  • The research didn't deliver what the Trump campaign sought and the findings were kept undisclosed.


 

Dakota

~~~~~~~
Bias?

So when presented with evidence that the 2020 election wasn't fair - wasn't the most secure - you leftist say "oh bias"

Okay - fine, it is bias for you to say otherwise. There! nanny nanny boo boo stick your head in doo
 

Kyle

ULTRA-F###ING-MAGA!
PREMO Member
Bias?

So when presented with evidence that the 2020 election wasn't fair - wasn't the most secure - you leftist say "oh bias"

Okay - fine, it is bias for you to say otherwise. There! nanny nanny boo boo stick your head in doo
They game the system with harvested nursing home and prison votes, lock observers out of precints so they can get their counting hijinx underway (which always seems to have a huuuuugggge batch of Democrat votes at 3am), they mysteriously find 5%, 10% or 20% MORE Democrat votes than some districts HAVE voters and they wonder why no one trusts the election.

:lmao:
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Bias?

So when presented with evidence that the 2020 election wasn't fair - wasn't the most secure - you leftist say "oh bias"

Okay - fine, it is bias for you to say otherwise. There! nanny nanny boo boo stick your head in doo

The bias is how you are presenting the results of the judicial proceedings.

Trump has not "won" anything. Many of those cases don't even involve him
 

Dakota

~~~~~~~
You fell out of the stupid tree and smacked every branch coming down STM. - every single one!!!
 

CPUSA

Well-Known Member
YEs 27 through 88 do not involve Trump yet you used them in your total.

Meaning you are a liar
Everything you have ever posted is either a lie or biased....EVERYTHING...
and yet, you keep slinking your stank ass up in here like anyone wants to see you whining, crying, & lies...
Simple assed crack hoodlum
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
A research firm hired by former President Donald Trump's 2020 campaign to validate the former president's claims of election fraud instead was unable to find evidence to support his theories, nor were the findings released to the public, according to The Washington Post.

The Berkeley Research Group was commissioned by the Trump campaign to analyze the voting data from six states to probe whether voter fraud or any irregularities had occurred during the 2020 election. Areas of focus for the probe were voter machine malfunctions, allegations that a mass of deceased individuals had voted in the election, and other evidence that could point to a Trump victory, per the report.

The Trump campaign envisioned using evidence from the report to bolster the then-president's claims in the public arena and in court.

But individuals with knowledge of the situation told The Post that the results didn't line up with what the Trump team had sought, and the research group's findings were subsequently not disclosed to the public.

 
Top