Trump misspells “Peopel” and “ “alcaida”

This_person

Well-Known Member
There is no proof he is actually a billionaire

Do you mean other than the independent analyses done repeatedly, ranking him as a multi-billionaire for many, many years?

How about the financial disclosure statement he files annually - have you read that yet?

and he lost the popular vote

So did everyone else, because NO ONE got >50%, and rarely do.

and had russian help to stela the electoral college

You've never read the Mueller report, have you.

Synopsis for you: Russians tried to sew discontent in the voting populace, like they've done for decades, and it had zero impact on the election. Google impacted millions more votes than the Russian group did.

not to mention he cant even spell "people"

Which, on the grand scheme of things, is even less important than Obama not being able to pronounce "corpsman" - and that was not important at all.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Synopsis for you: Russians tried to sew discontent in the voting populace, like they've done for decades, and it had zero impact on the election. Google impacted millions more votes than the Russian group did.




 

AnthonyJames

R.I.P. My Brother Rick
Trump cant read or spell. His followers are to dumb to recognize that so it doesn't matter.
Have you mastered this yet?
139133
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
Do you mean other than the independent analyses done repeatedly, ranking him as a multi-billionaire for many, many years?

How about the financial disclosure statement he files annually - have you read that yet?



So did everyone else, because NO ONE got >50%, and rarely do.



You've never read the Mueller report, have you.

Synopsis for you: Russians tried to sew discontent in the voting populace, like they've done for decades, and it had zero impact on the election. Google impacted millions more votes than the Russian group did.



Which, on the grand scheme of things, is even less important than Obama not being able to pronounce "corpsman" - and that was not important at all.


You obviously haven't read the Mueller report if you believe that is the synopsis.

Why do you keep defending a president for his continued incompetence?

Yet you constantly bring up talking points about past presidents and private citizens as if the whataboutism negates the falling of our current president?

Why are you so obsessed with private citizens and unconcerned with someone so stupid who has immense power?
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
You obviously haven't read the Mueller report if you believe that is the synopsis.

Quote the part where it says the Russians stela'd the electoral college votes for Trump.

Why do you keep defending a president for his continued incompetence?

I stopped defending Obama a long time ago.

Yet you constantly bring up talking points about past presidents and private citizens as if the whataboutism negates the falling of our current president?

It's putting things in perspective.

Why are you so obsessed with private citizens and unconcerned with someone so stupid who has immense power?
I'm not unconcerned with Pelosi at all, nor Schumer. Why would you think I am?
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
Quote the part where it says the Russians stela'd the electoral college votes for Trump.

I stopped defending Obama a long time ago.

It's putting things in perspective.

I'm not unconcerned with Pelosi at all, nor Schumer. Why would you think I am?


More flippant and idiotic responses. Typical from someone with no ethics or morals.

You really should be ashamed of yourself.

I doubt you would espouse these views face to face in public since they are so abhorrent.

A full throated defense of caging children and denying them basic hygiene and sleep is enough to make anything else you say irrelevant
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
More flippant and idiotic responses. Typical from someone with no ethics or morals.

You really should be ashamed of yourself.

I doubt you would espouse these views face to face in public since they are so abhorrent.

A full throated defense of caging children and denying them basic hygiene and sleep is enough to make anything else you say irrelevant
Quote the part where it says the Russians stela'd the electoral college votes for Trump.
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
Quote the part where it says the Russians stela'd the electoral college votes for Trump.

"The Mueller Report found that the Russian government "interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion" and "violated U.S. criminal law".[10][11][80] The report relayed two methods by which Russia attempted to influence the election.[81][82]


The first method of Russian interference was done through the Internet Research Agency (IRA), waging "a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton."[13] The IRA also sought to "provoke and amplify political and social discord in the United States".[12][83]

By February 2016, internal IRA documents showed an order to support the candidacies of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, while IRA members were to "use any opportunity to criticize" Hillary Clinton and the rest of the candidates.[84] From June 2016, the IRA organized election rallies in the U.S. "often promoting" Trump's campaign while "opposing" Clinton's campaign.[85] The IRA posed as Americans, hiding their Russian background, while asking Trump campaign members for campaign buttons, flyers, and posters for the rallies.[86] The Mueller Report detailed that the IRA spent $100,000 for over 3,500 Facebook advertisements, which included anti-Clinton and pro-Trump advertisements.[86]

The second method of Russian interference saw the Russian military intelligence agency GRU hacking into email accounts owned by volunteers and employees of the Clinton presidential campaign, including that of campaign chairman John Podesta, and also hacking into "the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC)". As a result, the GRU obtained hundreds of thousands of hacked documents, and the GRU proceeded by arranging releases of damaging hacked material via the WikiLeaks organization and also GRU's false personas "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0".[17][15][16]"

sources such as FactCheck.org, PBS NewsHour, and The New York Times describe the report as detailing eleven episodes where Trump could have possibly obstructed justice; one episode as a presidential candidate or president-elect, and ten episodes while Trump was president:[37][38][116]

Attorney General William Barr stated that there are ten episodes of potential obstruction.[117] Other sources such as The Washington Post and The Hill also report ten episodes; both omit the episode when Trump was a presidential candidate or president-elect.[33][118] CBS News counts ten episodes, omitting the one involving Corey Lewandowski.[119]

Quinta Jurecic, the managing editor of Lawfare, created a chart to simplify and summarize Mueller's analysis of these episodes in the report. Jurecic does not analyze the episode that occurred when Trump was a presidential candidate or president-elect.[120]"
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
You have a problem with reading comprehension



Fantasy, Supposition, Innuendo



Fantasy, Supposition, Innuendo

View attachment 139135


You are a grown man who lives at home with your mother and is most likely receiving government benefits.

You spend all day on here defending Trump and posting propaganda most of it from questionable sources and we are supposed to to believe you read 448 pages and analyzed all of it and didnt just parrot what Barr wants you to believe.

Ok.

Sure
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
"The Mueller Report found that the Russian government "interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion" and "violated U.S. criminal law".[10][11][80] The report relayed two methods by which Russia attempted to influence the election.[81][82]


Interference ≠ Stealing the Electoral College



Communists / Stalinists / Russians have been mucking around on American Politics string declension since the 1920s

it is incredible you think a $ 2 million dollar GRU Budget and 12 trolls from the Internet Research Agency in Minsk

could out do 1 billion dollars spent between Hillary / Trump / Super PACS and Candidate Advocacy advertisements
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
The first method of Russian interference was done through the Internet Research Agency (IRA), waging "a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton."[13] The IRA also sought to "provoke and amplify political and social discord in the United States".[12][83]

By February 2016, internal IRA documents showed an order to support the candidacies of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, while IRA members were to "use any opportunity to criticize" Hillary Clinton and the rest of the candidates.[84] From June 2016, the IRA organized election rallies in the U.S. "often promoting" Trump's campaign while "opposing" Clinton's campaign.[85] The IRA posed as Americans, hiding their Russian background, while asking Trump campaign members for campaign buttons, flyers, and posters for the rallies.[86] The Mueller Report detailed that the IRA spent $100,000 for over 3,500 Facebook advertisements, which included anti-Clinton and pro-Trump advertisements.[86]

So, as I said, sew political discord. It was to favor everyone BUT Clinton, which is NOT the same as just Trump.

It also says nothing about the electoral college electors, which is what your claim stated.

The second method of Russian interference saw the Russian military intelligence agency GRU hacking into email accounts owned by volunteers and employees of the Clinton presidential campaign, including that of campaign chairman John Podesta, and also hacking into "the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC)". As a result, the GRU obtained hundreds of thousands of hacked documents, and the GRU proceeded by arranging releases of damaging hacked material via the WikiLeaks organization and also GRU's false personas "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0".[17][15][16]"

So, your position is that Clinton may have won if we just didn't know the truth about her and the DNC? And, that's somehow Trump's fault, or the Russians' fault? "How dare they?" you scream, "they told us the truth, and that's not fair to my fav candidate!!"
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
So, as I said, sew political discord. It was to favor everyone BUT Clinton, which is NOT the same as just Trump.

It also says nothing about the electoral college electors, which is what your claim stated.

So, your position is that Clinton may have won if we just didn't know the truth about her and the DNC? And, that's somehow Trump's fault, or the Russians' fault? "How dare they?" you scream, "they told us the truth, and that's not fair to my fav candidate!!"


Yeah because when Comey warned of a leak days before the election that never materialized with anything relevant that had no impact on the election.
Sure

Take off your blinders.

Stealing the election with Russian help means just that, Winning the electoral college, was how it was done since it is obviously he lost the popular vote,
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
Take off your blinders.

139136


Stealing the election with Russian help means just that, Winning the electoral college, was how it was done since it is obviously he lost the popular vote,
You've lost your ####ing mind!

:killingme :roflmao: :killingme
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
You are a grown man who lives at home with your mother

What does your unhealthy obsession with my family situation have to do with the discussion at hand.

and is most likely receiving government benefits.

What is YOUR Obsession with my financial status have to do with the discussion at hand.

You having nothing of substance to add, so you attack my character, like I have less of a right to partake in the discussion, because of how I choose to take care of my family or basically live.

What an Elitist Condescending Douche bag ....

You spend all day on here defending Trump

Says the guy on here attacking everyone whom disagrees with his position ...

and posting propaganda most of it from questionable sources

Anything that does not conform to YOUR World View is Propaganda

and we are supposed to to believe you read 448 pages and analyzed all of it

Ah Yes .... the dismissive hand wav'em .....

Oh so ONLY people that read the report from cover to cover can offer an opinion on the matter ....
no one else, nobody that listened to legal analysis of others

and didn't just parrot what Barr wants you to believe.


I'll Take Alan Dershowitz Legal Opinion's over those of CNN Any day of the week.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Yeah because when Comey warned of a leak days before the election that never materialized with anything relevant that had no impact on the election.
Sure

Take off your blinders.

Are you saying Comey worked for the Russians?

Stealing the election with Russian help means just that, Winning the electoral college, was how it was done since it is obviously he lost the popular vote,
Yet, nothing in there shows that there was any impact on the electoral college vote, or even an intent to do so. Thanks for pointing that out! :yay:
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
What does your unhealthy obsession with my family situation have to do with the discussion at hand.



What is YOUR Obsession with my financial status have to do with the discussion at hand.

You having nothing of substance to add, so you attack my character, like I have less of a right to partake in the discussion, because of how I choose to take care of my family or basically live.

What an Elitist Condescending Douche bag ....



Says the guy on here attacking everyone whom disagrees with his position ...



Anything that does not conform to YOUR World View is Propaganda



Ah Yes .... the dismissive hand wav'em .....

Oh so ONLY people that read the report from cover to cover can offer an opinion on the matter ....
no one else, nobody that listened to legal analysis of others




I'll Take Alan Dershowitz Legal Opinion's over those of CNN Any day of the week.


So you admit you didnt read the report?
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
Are you saying Comey worked for the Russians?


Yet, nothing in there shows that there was any impact on the electoral college vote, or even an intent to do so. Thanks for pointing that out! :yay:


So you don't understand how our elections run along with all the other things that baffle you?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
So you admit you didnt read the report?

sorry sugar tits that does not invalidate my opinion
I did not read the contents of the tariffs applied to China, that dos not invalidate my right to hold or offer an opinion
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
So you don't understand how our elections run along with all the other things that baffle you?
I'm not baffled at all. You said the Russians [stole] the electoral college vote for Trump. Years of investigation shows that not true.

I fully understand it.
 
Top