Trump Team's Meeting With Latino Leaders Gets Mixed Reviews

nhboy

Ubi bene ibi patria
" It was billed as a "listening session," a chance for Latino leaders from across the country to sit down with members of president-elect Donald Trump's transition team and talk about the issues important to them and to their constituents.

The invitation alone was notable, given the notoriously rocky relationship Trump has had with Latinos since the start of his campaign. Leaders of some of the largest Latino civil rights organizations have tried without success for more than a year to gain an audience with Trump or his team.

They finally got their wish on Tuesday. It was a breakthrough, but not everyone experienced it the same way.

According to some of those in attendance, there were more than 50 people in the room. A few were leaders of the country's largest progressive advocacy groups like the National Council of La Raza, the League of United Latin American Citizens, and the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda. Many more represented conservative, evangelical, or pro-business organizations – groups like the LIBRE Initiative, the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, and regional Latino chambers of commerce.

"The listening session with Hispanic organizations was extremely well-attended and consisted of a wide ranging, frank discussion on areas of both agreement and concerns," a Trump transition official said in an email to NPR. "This is the beginning of a conversation that will continue throughout the Trump administration. The Hispanic community will play a central role in our engagement going forward."

But a big question for some in the room was this: Which Hispanic community?

Some of the attendees expressed concerns that the group convened by Trump's team did not accurately reflect the nation's broader Latino population or its priorities. They spoke with NPR on the condition that they not be named, given that it was an off-the-record gathering. "

http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2017/01/11/509224734/trump-teams-meeting-with-latino-leaders-gets-mixed-reviews
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
According to some of those in attendance, there were more than 50 people in the room. A few were leaders of the country's largest progressive advocacy groups like the National Council of La Raza, the League of United Latin American Citizens, and the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda. Many more represented conservative, evangelical, or pro-business organizations – groups like the LIBRE Initiative, the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, and regional Latino chambers of commerce.

Some of the attendees expressed concerns that the group convened by Trump's team did not accurately reflect the nation's broader Latino population or its priorities


So who did they want invited, the list sounds pretty broad to me.
Somebody would complain if they served free Taco's for lunch. There is no pleasing people who have the WANTS.
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
Trump's issue is with criminal, illegal aliens. These advocacy groups should be concerned with them also.

Time to drop the hyphen and self identify as American.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Trump's issue is with criminal, illegal aliens. These advocacy groups should be concerned with them also.

Time to drop the hyphen and self identify as American.

Do you really think La Raza or the rest of these Hispanic front groups want to be Americans?
They want America given back to the Mexicans.
 

bilbur

New Member
I think they should revise the immigration policy so that anyone here illegally without a criminal record could have a chance to stay for a 10 year probationary period. All they would have to do is sign a contract that states they will have a job in under 3 months, they will stay out of trouble with the law, they will pay taxes on all income, they will not apply for or accept any welfare or social program assistance for 10 years, and they will not harbor any criminals. If they violate the contract they are deported at their expense. This would fast track all the people that could actually contribute to the country while getting rid of the ones that commit crimes and take. Processing them would only require a signed contract and a background check.
 

Clem72

Well-Known Member
I think they should revise the immigration policy so that anyone here illegally without a criminal record could have a chance to stay for a 10 year probationary period. All they would have to do is sign a contract that states they will have a job in under 3 months, they will stay out of trouble with the law, they will pay taxes on all income, they will not apply for or accept any welfare or social program assistance for 10 years, and they will not harbor any criminals. If they violate the contract they are deported at their expense. This would fast track all the people that could actually contribute to the country while getting rid of the ones that commit crimes and take. Processing them would only require a signed contract and a background check.

Oh, just sign a contract and we're good? I mean, they had no issue breaking the law entering the country, but they will definitely honor the contract.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I think they should revise the immigration policy so that anyone here illegally without a criminal record could have a chance to stay for a 10 year probationary period. All they would have to do is sign a contract that states they will have a job in under 3 months, they will stay out of trouble with the law, they will pay taxes on all income, they will not apply for or accept any welfare or social program assistance for 10 years, and they will not harbor any criminals. If they violate the contract they are deported at their expense. This would fast track all the people that could actually contribute to the country while getting rid of the ones that commit crimes and take. Processing them would only require a signed contract and a background check.

One of the things a person who has been here ten years should be required to do ie either apply for citizenship or go back the the country they are a citizen of.
If they have been here 10 years and cannot speak or decipher English, and do not wish to become American citizens they should head on home.
 
Top