Trumps approval rating hits new low

Dupontster

Dupontster

Would THIS face lie?
They only polled Liberal Democrats.. Snowflakes.. Oh wait, Maybe they polled the same people that said Hillary had it in the bag..
 
awpitt

awpitt

Main Streeter
SamSpade said:
Care to back that up with *anything*? The press likes to use this yardstick but it's simply not true. The one who created the concept was FDR, but even he was referring to the first 100 days that CONGRESS was in session. And that year, it started later.
Click to expand...

Yes but that's because, at that time, the presidential inauguration occurred on March 4th so yes the congressional session would've started later.



SamSpade said:
Umm, no, it's completed, no thanks to an obscene foot dragging by the Senate. I don't know where you got this information.
It didn't take a long time because he had no nominees - but it's the Senate's fault, notably, Democrats fighting it. THAT is a joke.
Click to expand...

The GOP controls the senate.
 
S

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
littlelady said:
Well, if you and your fellow leapfrogs (that want socialism/communism) would get out of his way, maybe he could accomplish something. Which he has, despite your road blocks; pun intended. And, what is it about people like you that don't want America to be great? I don't get it. Is it a chip, is it a personal problem, is it that y'all want socialism/communism? Most Americans with a brain know Obama was a plant that didn't grow. If you believe he was an American citizen then you are more ignorant than I thought. I am at a loss why you are fighting against the Founding Father's terms for America. The takeaway that I get from people like you is that you don't believe in America. Too bad for you.
Click to expand...

So because you didn't like Obama and his policies that means you wanted America to fail? Because that is what you are saying just because I disagree with Trumps behavior and policies. Of curse I want the best for this country and I don't believe Trump is a very good president so far. That doesn't equate to me hating America. I am an American and have every right to my opinion and my vote just as you do.
 
S

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
SamSpade said:
Care to back that up with *anything*? The press likes to use this yardstick but it's simply not true. The one who created the concept was FDR, but even he was referring to the first 100 days that CONGRESS was in session. And that year, it started later.
Please look at what other Presidents have done in their first 100 days with or without CONGRESS which is firmly Republican at the moment and you will see Trump has accomplished very little in comparison.


Umm, no, it's completed, no thanks to an obscene foot dragging by the Senate. I don't know where you got this information.
It didn't take a long time because he had no nominees - but it's the Senate's fault, notably, Democrats fighting it. THAT is a joke.
Click to expand...

And you are correct. Sorry. It was late I meant he has yet to fill 60% of Executve branch vacancies.
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
awpitt said:
Yes but that's because, at that time, the presidential inauguration occurred on March 4th so yes the congressional session would've started later.
Click to expand...

But Congress only started late THAT YEAR. Nevertheless, it means the FDR team had almost two more months to prepare.


The GOP controls the senate.
Click to expand...

But the approval process doesn't just sit on the whole Senate vote; otherwise it would be done in minutes rather than months.
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Sapidus said:
And you are correct. Sorry. It was late I meant he has yet to fill 60% of Executve branch vacancies.
Click to expand...

And that is actually not uncommon. Would there was a better process to fill those seats - coming from someone who works for a federal agency that often goes without someone at the top.
 
W

Wishbone

New Member
SamSpade said:
But the approval process doesn't just sit on the whole Senate vote; otherwise it would be done in minutes rather than months.
Click to expand...

That works in citizens favor more often than it works against them. The less those buggers screw with, the better the country runs.

Unfortunately they have a mountain of bull#### law on the books already...
 
S

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
SamSpade said:
And that is actually not uncommon. Would there was a better process to fill those seats - coming from someone who works for a federal agency that often goes without someone at the top.
Click to expand...


“There’s no question this is the slowest transition in decades,” said R. Nicholas Burns, a former State Department official who served under presidents of both parties and has been involved in transitions since 1988. “It is a very, very big mistake. The world continues — it doesn’t respect transitions.”


It's actually not that common to have this many vacancies at this stage.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/12/us/politics/trump-administration.html
 
Gilligan

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Sapidus said:
“There’s no question this is the slowest transition in decades,” said R. Nicholas Burns, a former State Department official who served under presidents of both parties and has been involved in transitions since 1988. “It is a very, very big mistake. The world continues — it doesn’t respect transitions.”


It's actually not that common to have this many vacancies at this stage.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/12/us/politics/trump-administration.html
Click to expand...

.as the moron then references a story that is over three months old..:lmao::lmao::lmao:
 
awpitt

awpitt

Main Streeter
SamSpade said:
But Congress only started late THAT YEAR. Nevertheless, it means the FDR team had almost two more months to prepare.
Click to expand...

FDR was inaugurated on March 4, 1933. In 1933, the Congress was in session from March 9th - June 16th. Sixty-nine legislative days.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top