Do you admit they are not tax records ?They don't analyze based on his claims, and he files financial disclosure statements annually.
Have you reviewed them?
Do you admit they are not tax records ?They don't analyze based on his claims, and he files financial disclosure statements annually.
Have you reviewed them?
..........didn't say that but please spin away.Huh.... I didnt know that the total value of ones assets, minus the total value of all your liabilities are on ones taxes....
I would beg to differ , he has filed for bankruptcy 4 different time and lets no forget his debunked College scam among may other failed attempts to scam the public.
Absolutely! Do you admit tax records (a) are already reviewed by the government and have been for decades, (b) will tell you nothing about his net worth, (c) will not include any specific details of any deals with any partners or banks, (d) are not appropriate for review since there is no evidence of any specific criminal activity, and (e) are not constitutional requirements for any president or presidential candidate?Do you admit they are not tax records ?
Do you admit they are not tax records ?
What does any of this have to do with seeing his tax returns when he already files financial documents that are more telling than tax returns?I would beg to differ , he has filed for bankruptcy 4 different time and lets no forget his debunked College scam among may other failed attempts to scam the public.
Just to start..........
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/donald-trump-scandals/474726/
https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/the-complete-listing-so-far-atrocities-1-546
https://www.americanprogress.org/is...31299/100-ways-100-days-trump-hurt-americans/
You should have payed better attention in school..............didn't say that but please spin away.
A remarkably low failure rate, considering how many businesses he has owned.I would beg to differ , he has filed for bankruptcy 4 different time and lets no forget his debunked College scam among may other failed attempts to scam the public.
Just to start..........
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/donald-trump-scandals/474726/
https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/the-complete-listing-so-far-atrocities-1-546
https://www.americanprogress.org/is...31299/100-ways-100-days-trump-hurt-americans/
So you are another dunce that believe tax returns contain net worth information. They do not.Do you admit they are not tax records ?
How is he stealing?I'm sure you do.Most trump supporters would rather see him steal from the country than stand up and do what is right.
That...and what is he stealing?How is he stealing?
And now Trump has announced that Doral will no longer host the G7 summit
What a BS answer, because the Dems were upset about it he is cancelling it? When has that stopped him from ANYTHING?? So what, is he getting weaker? Or is the truth is that this was completely illegal and likely trigger an Emoluments clause violation?
Andrew McCarthy: Trump Doral resort pick for G-7 a 'real unforced error' | Fox News
The Trump administration's decision to host next year's G-7 summit at the Trump National Doral Golf Club was a "real unforced error," Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy said Friday.www.google.com
And now Trump has announced that Doral will no longer host the G7 summit
What a BS answer, because the Dems were upset about it he is cancelling it? When has that stopped him from ANYTHING?? So what, is he getting weaker? Or is the truth is that this was completely illegal and likely trigger an Emoluments clause violation?
Andrew McCarthy: Trump Doral resort pick for G-7 a 'real unforced error' | Fox News
The Trump administration's decision to host next year's G-7 summit at the Trump National Doral Golf Club was a "real unforced error," Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy said Friday.www.google.com
Wait, so now you're pissed that he's NOT having at the Doral? Pick a side and stick with it.
Or is the truth is that this was completely illegal and likely trigger an Emoluments clause violation?
Or is the truth is that this was completely illegal and likely trigger an Emoluments clause violation?
Fantasy, Supposition, Innuendo, ASSUMPTION