Tucker Words and Comments

Hijinx

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I am not so sure he isn't right and there is a small group of people who actually run the world.
 
kwillia

kwillia

n/a
Sneakers said:
My take-away from the videos is that getting inside was a totally unexpected and unplanned occurrence. Group momentum got them in, and once in, they really had no idea what the next step was. They never expected to be in that position.
Click to expand...
I was watching live feed that day and witnessed the uniformed security at the door holding the door open with one arm while waving them in with the other. The people were filing in as if on a guided tour… no pushing, shoving or even walking fast.
 
Hijinx

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Nancy Pelosi planned the whole thing, the FBI was working with her.
Outside agitators working the crowd.
Like the Kennedy assassination we will never know the whole truth.
Meanwhile people were destroyed by it and still languish in jail.
 
H

herb749

Well-Known Member
Hijinx said:
Nancy Pelosi planned the whole thing, the FBI was working with her.
Outside agitators working the crowd.
Like the Kennedy assassination we will never know the whole truth.
Meanwhile people were destroyed by it and still languish in jail.
Click to expand...

He next needs to point out the undercover people rallying & leading people to the door but not entering.
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Kyle said:
Shows how active Democrats imaginations are.
Click to expand...
You know, when Will Rogers said "All I know is what I read in the papers" - Americans across the country laughed, because it was SUPPOSED TO BE FUNNY.

A hundred years ago - and further back - Americans knew that the press lied to them all the time. Of all the hats Ben Franklin wore, he was proudest of being "a printer" - a man who printed newspapers. And he was famous for exploiting bias in the press to move public opinion.

What bothers me is the low information voter - and they're not necessarily unintelligent people. They're just not into following what's going on. There's a Scripture that says the first to present his case seems right, until someone comes along to question it - well, in our press, if you're first out the door with a completely bullchit story, it will still linger in people's minds long after people have questioned it and proven otherwise.

We have idiots who STILL THINK Sicknick was killed with a fire extinguisher, even though it was false, it was made up, there was never any proof of that, it was ALWAYS speculation and every major media outlet that originally ran with it has run a retraction. People will STILL SAY IT HAPPENED. If you show them they're wrong, they won't believe you. The Russian collusion story has been shown beyond all doubt that it originated from a dossier full of bullchit coming from Clinton's own oppo research and it couldn't pass muster for several tries - because it was crap. Amazingly, now that it's been over for years - no "new" witnesses or data has come to light, because there wasn't any.

People STILL claim Russians elected Trump, but sneer at the idea that Trump beat Biden as some kind of conspiracy crap.
 
Hijinx

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
SamSpade said:
You know, when Will Rogers said "All I know is what I read in the papers" - Americans across the country laughed, because it was SUPPOSED TO BE FUNNY.

A hundred years ago - and further back - Americans knew that the press lied to them all the time. Of all the hats Ben Franklin wore, he was proudest of being "a printer" - a man who printed newspapers. And he was famous for exploiting bias in the press to move public opinion.

What bothers me is the low information voter - and they're not necessarily unintelligent people. They're just not into following what's going on. There's a Scripture that says the first to present his case seems right, until someone comes along to question it - well, in our press, if you're first out the door with a completely bullchit story, it will still linger in people's minds long after people have questioned it and proven otherwise.

We have idiots who STILL THINK Sicknick was killed with a fire extinguisher, even though it was false, it was made up, there was never any proof of that, it was ALWAYS speculation and every major media outlet that originally ran with it has run a retraction. People will STILL SAY IT HAPPENED. If you show them they're wrong, they won't believe you. The Russian collusion story has been shown beyond all doubt that it originated from a dossier full of bullchit coming from Clinton's own oppo research and it couldn't pass muster for several tries - because it was crap. Amazingly, now that it's been over for years - no "new" witnesses or data has come to light, because there wasn't any.

People STILL claim Russians elected Trump, but sneer at the idea that Trump beat Biden as some kind of conspiracy crap.
Click to expand...
When you consider that the democrat party is not a political party, but a cult , you will understand them better.
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Ray Epps' Lawyer Threatens Tucker Carlson: 'You Didn't See What You Saw on J6 Video — or Else'​




So goes the gist of the letter sent to Tucker Carlson and Fox News from Epps’ new attorney.

The letter from Epps’s lawfare lawyer, formerly of Perkins Coie, to Carlson claims, “the fanciful notions that Mr. Carlson advances on his show regarding Mr. Epps’s involvement in the January 6th insurrection are demonstrably (and already proven to be) false.”

The “proof” suggesting that Epps didn’t do what he was seen doing was not provided. We’d all love to see that. The January 6 Committee’s private meeting with Epps, during which Adam Kinzinger fluffed him and granted him absolution, isn’t proof, actually. And his then-former FBI agent-attorney doesn’t absolve Epps of suspicions that he may have been a government informant of some kind on January 6, either.

This legal howler isn’t meant just for Carlson; it’s a narrative directive to a compliant media from the man who brought you Media Matters. And now David Brock’s other group, Facts First, has a stable of lawyers willing to tie people up in court for years in a legal war of attrition. They don’t call it lawfare for nothing.

And it’s working.

ray-epps-directive-730x452.jpg
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Two years later, Jan. 6 video footage raises new questions about police and prosecutors​




Pickett, who retired a few months after the Capitol riot, said he was briefed by colleagues on the extensive video sizzle reel his department's video security experts compiled, which he said took months to complete.

"The FBI would send them a picture on some kind of online clip, something of a person," Pickett said during a wide-ranging interview on the John Solomon Reports podcast. "And they would go to that area in the Capitol Building looking at the cameras, and it was kind of like a Where's Waldo. And they would find that person.

"And then from there, they would follow their movement, both forward and back from that location, and basically stitch together a video of that person from the time they entered Capitol grounds until the time they exited Capitol grounds. And they would put all that into one clip."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top