ylexot said:
I'd also like to know how much Norway is donating...
To be fair, on per capita donations to international humanitarian needs, Denmark is first, Norway is second, Switzerland is fourth, and one of those similar regioned/scandanvian type countries is third. I can't remember which one right now. That was a ranking in like 2000 or 2001. I would have to go find the statistics again. The U.S. is like 18th, but we are number one in per capita to those on the list with military spending. Our military is used more than anyone elses for U.N missions. Therefore, is it apples to oranges? Do they need our military just as much as they need humanitarian? Its subjective.
It still doesn't give him room to lecture us on taxes or a donation that (despite our population and productivity to do more) is still significant and will surely be an initial allocation, as most of our humanitarian assistance. Without per capita, we still by far dominate international humanitarian assistance in pure dollars.
Also, those countries who can't give so much, other than using the U.N. angle for our military missions, also do not have to pump money into military and economic relief for their own countries because many depend on our economy and the fact they don't need to protect themselves so much since the U.S. is there and nobody is going to hound one of our allies with the big stick sitting at the end of the block.
If they didn't have that to depend on, they would have to spend much more in economic growth initiatives and military in their own countries. We do what they don't have to, because of who we are.