U.N. plans global gun ban
- Thread starter 2ndAmendment
- Start date
Kofi Annan doesn't have anything to say about the gun laws in our country. He can piss up a rope.
Binding treaty on all members of he U.N.vraiblonde said:
Turn them in Mr. And Mrs. and to be PC, MS America ... or lock and load.
On tomorrows agenda.dustin said:2A, did you send in your three letters? Looks pretty easy to me I do believe I will print, sign, and mail
Oh bull. The UN can't just make law for the whole world. Not only will the US tell him to go to hell, but so will every other country except maybe France.2ndAmendment said:
Did you read any of the site? Your post indicates you didn't.vraiblonde said:
World Court ring a bell?
B
Bruzilla
Guest
If this is such a dire threat why is LaPierre holding back all this critical information pending you sending him money? If you want to see the debate... send money. If you want to learn more about the threat... send money. If you want to know anything more than the snipits provided... send money.
If this is such a crisis why not just post all of the info so we can get properly fired up without all the "UN Girls Gone Wild!!!" sales efforts.
If this is such a crisis why not just post all of the info so we can get properly fired up without all the "UN Girls Gone Wild!!!" sales efforts.
I read the page you directed us to :shrug:2ndAmendment said:
Anyway, we gave the finger to Kyoto, and I have no doubt we'll flip this one off, too.
2ndAmendment said:
They have zero authority to do that. They have no more authority to tell us how to deal with our own citizens than my boss can tell me what hand to wipe my azz with.
You know, I was always of the opinion as a kid that the U.N. was this nice international organization formed to encourage and promote peace - and to at least provide a place of diplomacy for peaceful resolution of conflict. Since then, I'm more and more of the opinion that it's a useless debate club that occasionally does good humanitarian work but has zero effectiveness when it comes to resolving global conflict.
As I've been on the Web for many years, I begin to realize that some in the world see it as the eventual nexus of world government - and I find that completely laughable. When Iraq invaded Kuwait, the UN was content to sit around debating with its thumb up its butt - completely impotent to do a damned thing about it. When genocide was raging through Rwanda and the Balkans, they didn't even sit around and debate it. And for the past 60 years, Israel - a nation it essentially created - has been at the center of world conflict, and they've pretty much sat on their hands and condemned them.
Even if the BECAME a bona fide world government - they'd be totally useless. They'd be like those wimpy cops in "Demolition Man", who tell Wesley Snipes to drop his weapon - or ELSE. But they had no intent of actually using force, and Snipes' character KNOWS this, and ignores them, predictably.
Until we, the U.S., signs the treaty. Then it will be a Constitutional conflict of momentous proportions. They keep trying. Eventually we will have a "Hillery" that will sign on unless we stop them from trying.Ken King said:
Wickedwrench
Stubborn and opinionated
2ndAmendment said:
Can I get an amen with that.
But we do not have a Hillary now. And you cannot stop people from "trying". You can only stop them from "succeeding".2ndAmendment said:
He would cause a Civil war in this country. Won't give up my guns to anyone. 
Do nothing if you like. Or write three letters serving the U.N. notice. Your choice. All I did was try to make you aware.
I think nothing needs to be done, not only would a treaty have to get passed by Congress but the 2nd Amendment would have to be overturned by a Constitutional Amendment resulting in specific state legislative action. Do you really see that happening?2ndAmendment said:
That scene comes to mind every time I hear about the UN passing some toothless resolution.