So none of the above posters (excluding my own) have any concept of "
personal conscience".
Link here =
Human Conscience
We are
NOT to follow the immoral and criminal orders of our worldly leaders.
We have a duty to defy the immoral commands,
one can do civil disobediance against criminal demands.
That would be more noble and more effective then committing suicide.
I do not think you have the right to judge those who have been where you have never been, yet are willing to protect same those rights that you demand are yours.
If any soldier were to follow your precepts, not only would he/she be violating his oath of duty, but by his actions would be disruptive to the team effort needed for all to survive. That in itself would be criminal if not catastrophic to the unit itself and therefore, unacceptable.
If a soldier has questions as to morality, he goes to the chaplain, explains his objections and leaves it in the hands of that capable individual. Barring that, he goes to his next number in the chain of command and so on. If he follows what you suggest, then he loses the confidence of his fellow soldiers, causes further disruption in the unit, with all the consequences mentioned above. Can you live with that ? If you can, you definitely deserve to live elsewhere.
There are no unions in the services. The Europeans, particularly the Dutch and Belgians, had them for awhile, but it caused severe discipline problems.
The armed forces are not a democracy and most of us who serve or served. accept that. We accept the fact that discipline and the sense of brotherhood you will never understand is needed for the welfare of the unit to exist in the most extreme conditions. That is why what you advocate is unacceptable , period.
It is easy in a safe and orderly world to say what we should do, but it is not that kind of world, so why don't YOU show some respect to those that are providing you with the security for those rights.