U.S. Navy's Rescue Fuels Debate Over Arming Crews

aps45819

24/7 Single Dad
And this idiocy has to stop. In the meantime, a detachment of trained professionals could protect the ship while it's in dangerous waters, and depart with their gear when after the threat has passed.

That's currently available.






... for a price
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
.. and everything gets confiscated at the next port.

Can you imagine the jail time if a ship pulled into Baltimore with automatic weapons onboard?

Why? Baltimore is in the US. The US has a constitutional RIGHT to keep and bear arms. :shrug:
 

dustin

UAIOE
Pay the price, pay the ransom, or train and arm the crew. This isn't all that hard to figure out.
I believe this is going to be the choice for most crews. Contracted Protection.

Especially with ships which will be pulling in to nation ports which heavily regulate/ban personal firearms.
 

Matthew

New Member
Why not take a cue and lesson from both WW1 and WW2....arm certain ships like Q ships and these "raiders" will be a surprise for the other"raiders".
 

Pete

Repete
:pete:
 

Attachments

  • usnavy.jpg
    usnavy.jpg
    43.2 KB · Views: 20

edinsomd

New Member
For a little perspective.
 

Attachments

  • 6a00d8341bfadb53ef01156f2a0031970c-320wi.jpg
    6a00d8341bfadb53ef01156f2a0031970c-320wi.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 28
  • 6a00d8341bfadb53ef011570207911970b-320wi.jpg
    6a00d8341bfadb53ef011570207911970b-320wi.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 24
  • 6a00d8341bfadb53ef0115702079a3970b-320wi.jpg
    6a00d8341bfadb53ef0115702079a3970b-320wi.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 23
Top