Ukraine / Russian War

GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
In an op-ed written for the Washington Examiner, Byron York revealed the Democrats’ plan to take down Trump. The editorial’s headline read, “Undermining Trump in Ukraine.” It could have just said, “Undermining Trump.”

image 11.png

In his piece, Byron heavily quoted Michael McFaul, Obama’s diplomat to Russia and an influential member of the National Security Council, a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat neocon. There was much more, but the most interesting part was McFaul’s honest admission of the Democrats’ current plan: to criticize and badmouth Trump till his approval rating falls five points, then start picking off moderate Republicans.

Trump’s approval rating stands at 49.3%. Here are the key paragraphs:

image 10.png

McFaul gave the game away. He couched his comments in terms of Ukraine, but character assassination is the Democrats’ plan to stop the entire Trump agenda. They aren’t coming up with any ideas or policies or plans of their own. They are depending on wishy-washy Republicans in Congress and on flipping the House in the 2026 midterms.

I think Trump already knows this, and has some surprises planned for them.





www.coffeeandcovid.com

☕️ DIRTY DEEDS ☙ Tuesday, February 25, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠

DOGE theory spreads to the states; Daily Mail plays a difficult Yale jab study straight; Star Wars villain gets terminated; curiously times NSA leaks set Tulsi Gabbard up to clean house; and more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com www.coffeeandcovid.com
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member





Ukraine Never Had Nukes to Give Up: The Myth of Nuclear Disarmament Exposed



The widespread belief that Ukraine voluntarily surrendered a vast nuclear arsenal in exchange for ironclad security guarantees is a mischaracterization that has gained undue traction in public discourse. The reality is both simpler and more revealing: Ukraine never had operational control over any nuclear weapons at any point. The warheads and delivery systems stationed on Ukrainian soil at the time of independence were always under Moscow’s control, and Ukraine’s path toward nuclear disarmament was set before it ever became a sovereign state. The recent claims by President Volodymyr Zelensky—insisting that Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons in return for security guarantees—misrepresent history. Understanding this history correctly is crucial, especially in light of contemporary debates over NATO expansion, military aid, and Zelensky’s provocative demands for Ukraine’s own nuclear arsenal.

At the moment of its independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine found itself hosting the third-largest nuclear arsenal in the world, consisting of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), strategic bombers, and tactical nuclear warheads. However, this arsenal was effectively meaningless in a functional sense. The keys to detonation and launch codes remained in Moscow. The weapons could not be used, directed, or even maintained by Ukraine without Russian assistance. More importantly, well before Ukraine formally declared independence, it had already made a firm and public commitment never to seek or develop nuclear weapons. This commitment was enshrined in Ukraine’s 1990 Declaration of Sovereignty, which explicitly pledged that Ukraine would be a non-nuclear state. Without this commitment, many nations—including the United States—would have been reluctant to recognize Ukraine’s sovereignty or integrate it into the international system.

The oft-cited Budapest Memorandum of 1994 is frequently mischaracterized as a security guarantee in exchange for Ukraine’s nuclear weapons. In truth, the agreement merely affirmed the existing borders and sovereignty of Ukraine—commitments that Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom had already recognized. The notion that Ukraine was promised military intervention in the event of aggression is a distortion of what the document actually says. The Budapest Memorandum included assurances of respect for Ukraine’s sovereignty but lacked any binding enforcement mechanism. The idea that the U.S. or NATO was ever legally bound to intervene militarily in Ukraine’s defense is a convenient myth that has since been exploited for political purposes.
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member




Biden Rejects Putin’s NATO Expansion Red Line

During a phone call in December 2021, President Biden rejected President Putin's demand that NATO not expand into Ukraine.
https://x.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1894850279960650232/photo/1

Image

1740606954142.png
 
PJay

PJay

Well-Known Member
THERE IS IT!!! PEACE DEAL reached between Russia and Ukraine and Zelensky is flying to the USA to sign the deal made by President Trump. DETAILS: - United States gets 50% of the revenue from Ukraine's mineral wealth as repayment for money spent on the war - No membership to NATO - Ukraine concedes territory. Liberals... y'all go ahead and start crying but THIS SHlT IS OVER!!!!

 
PJay

PJay

Well-Known Member
President Trump announces that US taxpayers will be effectively reimbursed for funds sent to Ukraine.
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member


UKRAINE: President Trump allowed the media and the American people to get a glimpse of just how difficult Zelensky is to deal with. The level of entitlement and intragence is striking given the precarious situation Ukraine is in. Elections might be the only path to peace.

Embedded video
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member



WOW! Zelensky behaved SO BADLY in the Oval Office that he even lost Lindsey Graham

“Americans witnessing this would not want Zelenskyy to be their business partner including me. I've never been more proud of Trump for showing the American people and the world, you don't trifle with this man.”

“Vance was awesome!”
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member



Here's what happened inside the White House after the Oval Office shouting match:

Trump huddled with his key advisers immediately afterward inside the Oval.

According to a White House official, Trump consulted Vance, Rubio, Bessent, etc. That was when Trump decided that Zelensky was "not in a place to negotiate." He directed Secretary Rubio and his national security adviser Mike Waltz to deliver the message: it was time for Zelensky to leave.

The Ukrainians were holding nearby in a separate room. (That's standard for foreign leader visits.) Typically they reconvene for lunch. But the Ukrainians would not be dining at the White House. As the prepared food sat nearby on carts in a hallway, the Ukrainians were instructed to leave.

The White House official said the Ukrainians wanted to continue the talks. But they were told no.

Zelensky left shortly thereafter.
Click to expand...


https://x.com/kaitlancollins/status/1895557073003561421
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top