So, someone with as much integrity as yourself, and as somsone who feels the need to question the integrity of others would hire people known for dishonesty?
See, more lies by you. I never once said what I would do in that situation. Again, you try to project dishonesty where there is none!
Some disciplined previously by other police agencies for significant misconduct on duty?
What is the misconduct? Some agencies will call it misconduct if you take too much leave, even when your entitled.
Some who were flagged by background investigators for trying to manipulate the results of a polygraph exam?
I ask because according to the article, out of the 280 officers hired in 2010, 188 Were rejected for jobs at law enforcement agencies before being hired by the Sheriff's Department, 97 showed evidence of dishonesty, 2 were disciplined previously by other police agencies for significant misconduct on duty, 29 were fired or pressured to resign from a previous law enforcement job, 15 were flagged by background investigators for trying to manipulate the results of a polygraph exam.
It's easy to lump these things in and not explain what they did. Lets take a look at the below where they are saying these people are bad.
That's not counting cases in which applicants admitted to miscellaneous office theft when the value was less than $50 a year, at-fault car accidents that did not cause injuries, workplace tardiness, carelessness with public property, or instances in which applicants said they solicited prostitutes in countries where prostitution is legal or where The Times could not determine the laws at the time.
So are you saying a person shouldn't be a cop if they take a pen from work, get into a car accident, are late for work, or do something legal in another country?
It's a good thing the union failed to get a court order blocking publication, or we probably wouldn't know about it.
