UPDATE: Dad Who Put Baby In Microwave.

W

White Buddah

Guest
5 to 99 years? Tax payers shouldn't have to spend that much money on him. Just build a big microwave and nuke him until he apologizes and then keep going until "pop".
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Also in court Monday, defense attorney Sam Cammack III tried to argue that jurors should not learn what happened after police left Mauldin alone with his wife, Eva, in an interview room at the Joe Max Taylor Law Enforcement Center, 700 54th St.
If there's a hell, lawyers like this will burn for all eternity.

The Mom should be prosecuted as well because she obviously condones the father's actions, if she's giving him a hmm-hmm after he did that to her child.
 

AK-74me

"Typical White Person"
5 to 99 years? Tax payers shouldn't have to spend that much money on him. Just build a big microwave and nuke him until he apologizes and then keep going until "pop".

Did you read this....... "He puched the baby in the groin, then threw her from one bed to another, next locked her in the hotel room safe before putting her in the refriderator, finally putting her in the microwave."


He should have to have this replicated on him, then pop.
 
W

White Buddah

Guest
Did you read this....... "He puched the baby in the groin, then threw her from one bed to another, next locked her in the hotel room safe before putting her in the refriderator, finally putting her in the microwave."
He should have to have this replicated on him, then pop.
I did read it! All of that should happen while the microwave is being constructed.
 

Vince

......
The POS father should be executed. She should be sterilized and never allowed to have contact with children again.
 

AiryT

New Member
This makes me sad. I just can't believe someone would do something like that to a child. Why was he not charged with attempted murder?
 

ImnoMensa

New Member
The question for the jury to ask themselves is this:

Is this guy legally insane or just one of the most stupid and sadistic pieces of chit to ever breathe air.

The fact that his wife came into a police interrogation room and gave him a hummer tells me he isnt insane just stupid and that his wife is his equal in stupidity.

My next question is did the cops break into the room and stop them when the sex started or did they just enjoy the show..

You can bet it didnt take long for this story to make the rounds at the police station.
 
C

CalvertNewbie

Guest
The POS father should be executed. She should be sterilized and never allowed to have contact with children again.

I agree completely! Man, would I love to be on the jury when this case goes to trial. They are both trash and the fact that she would even want to speak to him or have any contact with him after what he did to their daughter amazes me. I can only imagine what these two idiots were put through during their own childhoods to even think of doing something like this. Parenting at it's best!

They will both be going to a really hot place when their time here is up! :burning:
 

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
If there's a hell, lawyers like this will burn for all eternity.

The Mom should be prosecuted as well because she obviously condones the father's actions, if she's giving him a hmm-hmm after he did that to her child.

are you kidding me? Its his job. Yes, he (?) picked one where he would have to defend people who are alleged criminals, but it is his way of making a living. He is paid to find any legal way to get this person the lowest possible sentence.
 

vegmom

Bookseller Lady
Here's the thing: his insanity defense only holds water if he did not know right from wrong. He can still be a nut case and know what he did was wrong but just did not care.

The mother....spay her before she reproduces again. And c'mon ya dumbazzes- you only need to see 1 stinking tv cop show to know that interview rooms have double mirrors. :smack:

I'd assume they will be stripped of all parental rights. Hope this poor kid gets a chance with parents who will actually care for her. :huggy:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
are you kidding me? Its his job. Yes, he (?) picked one where he would have to defend people who are alleged criminals, but it is his way of making a living. He is paid to find any legal way to get this person the lowest possible sentence.

A contract hitman is just making a living as well, but it doesn't make his choice of profession acceptable.

There are many defense lawyers who don't mix it up with this type of client. We have free will in this country and can choose how we make our living.
 

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
A contract hitman is just making a living as well, but it doesn't make his choice of profession acceptable.

There are many defense lawyers who don't mix it up with this type of client. We have free will in this country and can choose how we make our living.

difference being, one is a legal profession.

I'm willing to bet that this lawyer was the defense attorney appointed by the court...you know...if you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed to you......maybe it wasn't his choice to take on this case :yay:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I'm willing to bet that this lawyer was the defense attorney appointed by the court...you know...if you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed to you......maybe it wasn't his choice to take on this case :yay:

You're probably right, but he still chose it. This isn't Anthem, where a Council decides what job you will do.
 

libby

New Member
My daughter is 4 mos. old, and my stomach is knotted up reading what this darling baby endured.
How, how, how, can anyone dream of hurting these most defenseless angels. Little toothless smiles, bright eyes, and the precious cooing when they make eye contact and recognize loved ones.
God forgive me, I would shoot them myself if given the chance!
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Consider...

difference being, one is a legal profession.

I'm willing to bet that this lawyer was the defense attorney appointed by the court...you know...if you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed to you......maybe it wasn't his choice to take on this case :yay:

...this, if you will; A doctor takes an oath to do no harm. They won't always do their best, they will screw up, they are sometimes negligent, but, the goal, the stated goal is to help and to do no harm.

Lawyers have no such oath. Our justice has, as a cornerstone, judgment both by judges and by juries. The law doesn't just sit there and stand on it's own merits as a simple function of black and white and right and wrong. We judge a person who has been convicted of breaking law to determine severity, intent and so forth. When we limit what is admissible to a jury, we are taking judgement out of their hands and putting it in the hands of a defense lawyer who is, in fact, trying to make things better for what they know is a guilty person. I'd rather that lawyer have to stand in front of a jury and argue why it's not relevant they his clients had sex in that situation rather than arbitrarily have that evidence excluded. That, to me, does harm to justice.

Can you imagine if lawyers took an oath to always seek justice, to not do harm?
 

vegmom

Bookseller Lady
One thing to note: if his lawyer does not do a complete job defending this bastard he could have grounds for appeal. So a court appointed lawyer would have to defend his client to the best of his abilities to ensure the SOB does not tie up the courts. And if they could not get this guy any legal representation the case could get thrown out. Sort of a "damned if you do, damned if you don't".
 
Top