StoneThrower
New Member
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xcEp9lmbdLY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God. (John 3:16-21) NIV
And yet you want everybody to take your word for it.Why DOESN'T it surprise me that you'd take the word of a Presbyterian Irish man over God's?No wonder the church is where it is today...
Why DOESN'T it surprise me that you'd take the word of a Presbyterian Irish man over God's?No wonder the church is where it is today...
Starman, if you truly believe that when you say Calvinism "negates the Gospel", that it is TRUTH, then Calvinists are not only heretics, but we are not Christians at all.
Are you prepared to condemn all Calvinists or those who hold to the same views in antiquity such as Augustine?
If so, you condemn the following men to Hell:
Johnathan Edwards
Alistair Begg
J.I. Packer
Mark Devers
Thabiti Anyabwile
Kevin DeYoung
David Platt
Ligon Duncan
Warren Wiersbe
C. J. Mahaney
Carl F. H. Henry
Charles Spurgeon
Don Carson
James Petigru Boyce
James White
John MacArthur
Robert Murray M'Cheyne
John Gill
John Dagg
John Piper
Joshua Harris
Leonhard Euler
Martyn Lloyd-Jones
Al Mohler
Wayne Grudem
William Carey (Father of Baptist Missions)
Adoniram Judson
Eric Liddell (from Chariots of Fire)
Cornelius Van Til
John Owen
George Whitefield
John Bunyan (author of Pilgrims Progress)
Thomas Watson
Thomas Manton
RC Sproul
Thomas Brooks
Matthew Henry
All the rest of the Puritans
All Presbyterian churches
Half the Southern Baptist churches
Many evangelical Anglicans
The list goes on...
They are all evangelical Christians.Um...First of all, there is no safety in numbers. Just because many have been indoctrinated to believe one thing does not make it the truth. For example, there are 1.3 Billion Muslims on the wrong path; there are 1 Billion Catholics who believe Mary reigns as Queen of Heaven, helps people get into Heaven and that Jesus sends people to a spiritual half-way house before they can enter Heaven! Several Million Mormons believe Jesus is the spirit brother of Satan and has many wives; Millions of others follow other false religions and teachings of humanist thinkers. So, the list you provided is miniscule in comparison.
Does it? Where have I, as a Calvinist, said this?As you may recall, I have stated that Calvinism negates the Gospel Message of John 3:16-18 among others where The Message is that God loves all mankind and wants no one to perish.
You've mis-stated and are ignorant not only of Calvinism, but of mankind's natural fallen state as explained throughout the Scripture. Man is totally unable to choose the light because he walks in darkness, loves the darkness, and cannot even comprehend light.I have stated that Calvinism negates that Message by inferring that God does not want all to come to repentance and be saved and that Jesus only calls certain people to come to Him for God's Saving Grace and excludes others whom He will not even consider because He already predstined them to be hell-bound from the beginning!
And how does what I believe deny this?The Bible is clear that God calls all mankind and it is also clear that not all will respond because of their own refusal to change their wayward ways. If you have repented of this world and trusted Christ as your personal Lord and Saviour through faith and have been born-again of the Spirit, as Jesus said one must be, then according to the Bible you are a Child of God.
All have opportunity. Not all have mercy.To proclaim that others do not have that same opportunity except for only a select few is to change the Gospel Message of The Great Commission and calls into question God's Great White Throne Judgement by believing it will be a "kangaroo court".
I believe how you "persecute" people (Trying to tie Calvinism to Islam? Really?) for not accepting the "Starman's doctrine", is not an example of what a born-again Child of God nor person led by the Holy Spirit of God would even think of doing. My 2 cents.Additionally, I have stated that John Calvin and the "council" of Calvinists who persecuted, ex-communicated and burned people at the stake for not accepting the "Calvinist doctrine" is not an example of what a born-again Chlid of God nor person led by the Holy Spirit of God would even think of doing.
Maybe they did. I wasn't there. God will judge their actions in righteousness.The RCC engaged in such persecutions, excommunications and Inquisitions and from what it appears, John Calvin (and early Calvinists) did likewise.
You are confusing it with Hyper-Calvinism. These are characteristics of hyper-Calvinism:As I have also stated before, Calvinism takes the blame off of Satan and makes God out to be the "bad guy".
You might to occasionally talk to Him yourself as well. Perhaps to get some clarity?The question you are asking me should be taken before the Lord Jesus Christ for your answer as He will be the Judge of all mankind.
I agree we should stop debating. I actually never wanted a debate to begin with. I like reasoned dialog, not debate. If you recall, this whole "debate" started with me stating my theological views to UNA in response to a question and then I roundly got yelled at with "CONTEXT,CONTEXT, CONTEXT!" and "ME! I MADE THE CHOICE, NOT GOD!" or something similar. From there it evolved into you trying to associate Calvinism with Islam, you attacking a 500 year old dead man's character and judging his salvation, and when confronted with Scripture ad nauseum you respond with "I still believe that my God..." and "Calvinism negates the gospel!"Okay, Zguy - you have stated your position and I have stated mine. This debate has been going on long enough and there is no point to continue because you have made your choice and I have made mine on which to believe about God's Plan of Salvation being offered to mankind.
Of course. Calvinists agree. Most of us just don't base it on bad exegesis of 2 Peter 3:8.I will always believe that God calls all mankind to repentance and lets individuals make their choice of whether to repent or not.
Of course. Calvinists agree. God is omniscient. We just believe that said foreknowledge does not decide His actions, but rather His free choice, whatever the reason may be. All we know is that God ALWAYS chooses what brings Him the most glory.In so doing, I will always believe that when God's Offer of Salvation is made, He foreknew each individual before they were born and foreknew what decision they would make when called.
Again, Calvinists agree. Bible is clear on this, people are condemned for sin and for rejecting Jesus.I will always believe that at the Great White Throne Judgment those who are condemned to eternal death will be condemned because of their rejection of God's Plan of Salvation
1 Tim. 1 says Christ died for all. No arguing that. Never have.that was offered through the Atoning Blood of Jesus Christ, as mentioned in the Holy Bible.
Okay, Zguy - you have stated your position and I have stated mine. This debate has been going on long enough and there is no point to continue because you have made your choice and I have made mine on which to believe about God's Plan of Salvation being offered to mankind.
I will always believe that God calls all mankind to repentance and lets individuals make their choice of whether to repent or not. In so doing, I will always believe that when God's Offer of Salvation is made, He foreknew each individual before they were born and foreknew what decision they would make when called. I will always believe that at the Great White Throne Judgment those who are condemned to eternal death will be condemned because of their rejection of God's Plan of Salvation that was offered through the Atoning Blood of Jesus Christ, as mentioned in the Holy Bible.
...Is Jacob I loved and Esau I hated offensive to you?
I agree we should stop debating...
We differ on what some of the nature of the atonement was and what actually was accomplished at it. I don't think either of us deny that the Atonement accomplished salvation for some (whether they are unconditionally elected or conditionally elected) or that it was a substitutionary death for all men, especially for those who believe.
![]()
Putting the larger debate on predestination/foreknowledge aside for a second and focusing on the text at hand, I'm not sure how you can say that given the text in reference to Esau and Jacob.Not offensive at all; God foreknew the choice that would be made when Esau chose to give up his birthright for a bowl of stew. It is the analogy of carnal vs spiritual. Same as what is represented in the Cain and Abel account - doing what pleases God. Man has that choice when presented a decision of which way to go.
What else can "man's desire or effort" mean other than man's choice?11Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad—in order that God’s purpose in election might stand: 12not by works but by him who calls—she was told, “The older will serve the younger.”d 13Just as it is written: “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”e
14What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15For he says to Moses,
“I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,
and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”f
16It does not, therefore, depend on man’s desire or effort, but on God’s mercy.
Putting the larger debate on predestination/foreknowledge aside for a second and focusing on the text at hand, I'm not sure how you can say that given the text in reference to Esau and Jacob.
What else can "man's desire or effort" mean other than man's choice?
And Paul says the God's mercy does not depend on it. So, God doesn't consider your desire to be saved in response to the Gospel. It's right there.
Now, you might say "well that's only Esau and Jacob." And that seems like a good response on the surface. But it has problems and leads back into the larger debate.
But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake.
For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
(2 Corinthians 4:3-6)
Likewise, ye younger, submit yourselves unto the elder. Yea, all of you be subject one to another, and be clothed with humility: for God resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble.
Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time:
Casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you.
Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:
Whom resist stedfast in the faith, knowing that the same afflictions are accomplished in your brethren that are in the world.
(1 Peter 5:5-9)
Let's focus on this one statement.Zguy, if God created certain people to love Him that would not be a genuine and sincere love for God on their behalf.
That "cease fire" didn't last long did it? v v v :shrug:I agree. Let us then continue to preach Jesus and Him crucified and let God give the increase! (1 Corinthians 3:5-7)
I agree we should stop debating. I actually never wanted a debate to begin with. I like reasoned dialog, not debate. If you recall, this whole "debate" started with me stating my theological views to UNA in response to a question and then I roundly got yelled at with "CONTEXT,CONTEXT, CONTEXT!" and "ME! I MADE THE CHOICE, NOT GOD!" or something similar. From there it evolved into you trying to associate Calvinism with Islam, you attacking a 500 year old dead man's character and judging his salvation, and when confronted with Scripture ad nauseum you respond with "I still believe that my God..." and "Calvinism negates the gospel!"
Putting the larger debate on predestination/foreknowledge aside for a second and focusing on the text at hand, I'm not sure how you can say that given the text in reference to Esau and Jacob. What else can "man's desire or effort" mean other than man's choice?
Let's focus on this one statement.
A few simple questions to ponder.
Can God make people love Him? Or is it impossible for Him?
If an omnipotent God ordained that certain men would love Him, how would it not be sincere, if God Himself ordained it?
Does the Scripture speak to your notion of "sincere and genuine for God" as you have stated it? Or is it an assumption on your part?
I love them that love me; and those that seek me early shall find me.
(Proverbs 8:17)
And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart.
(Jeremiah 29:13)
The LORD is close to the brokenhearted and saves those who are crushed in spirit.
(Psalm 34:18)
The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise. (Psalm 51:17)
For thus saith the LORD unto the house of Israel, Seek ye me, and ye shall live:
But seek not Bethel, nor enter into Gilgal, and pass not to Beersheba: for Gilgal shall surely go into captivity, and Bethel shall come to nought. (Amos 5:3-5)
I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:
(Deuteronomy 30:19)